From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5D6C6379B for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:04:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C0360FE9 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:04:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232135AbhGVMYC (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:24:02 -0400 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de ([195.135.220.29]:45110 "EHLO smtp-out2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231924AbhGVMXC (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:23:02 -0400 Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B37203A6; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:03:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1626959010; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=AeHi8yqRRd8C3y1PFFiRFVfBm89RDZYPjYDMNnkbB78=; b=wNiM9jaQ3Hqm2v0l5TNrS30VUc8MecLkc6MbUpQgs5inDYza5KCtEOXbYhIMuzOYlTJJ9L 2Uj1aQw3PQIFcECW4T2b2DYBBOEe7mOA7P5NWERc4bdSxqfmfAS4jSJzUqnteip7Da59mg 0yXiNWRu7sqWSwC13WixTtYO0r86BjA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1626959010; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=AeHi8yqRRd8C3y1PFFiRFVfBm89RDZYPjYDMNnkbB78=; b=H0CvZ0L8XUstbkxMG4RpBmGTykLBaogRX73SrsxSslYNl/3TsZhfJWmkfntQUbRS3J9Dzo dcxti4Ww7Dr6TAAQ== Received: from ds.suse.cz (ds.suse.cz [10.100.12.205]) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D53BA3B84; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:03:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 10065) id 82217DAF95; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 15:00:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 15:00:48 +0200 From: David Sterba To: fdmanana@kernel.org Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] btrfs: make the batch insertion of dir index keys more efficient Message-ID: <20210722130048.GS19710@twin.jikos.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz Mail-Followup-To: dsterba@suse.cz, fdmanana@kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 04:05:21PM +0100, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote: > From: Filipe Manana > > The first patch makes the batch insertion of dir index keys (delayed items) > more efficient. The second patch is a cleanup, but only applies cleanly after > the first patch. Added to misc-next, thanks.