From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9251FC63798 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 18:08:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58390634E5 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 18:08:20 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 58390634E5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F466E9DA; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 18:08:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6DFD6E983; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 18:08:14 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10053"; a="297278078" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,261,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="297278078" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Jul 2021 11:08:14 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,261,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="577390173" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO d053b881505b) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Jul 2021 11:08:12 -0700 Received: from kbuild by d053b881505b with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m6d7D-0000bk-2r; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 18:08:11 +0000 Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 02:07:22 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Vinay Belgaumkar , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: [RFC PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: slpc_decode_min_freq() can be static Message-ID: <20210722180722.GA97350@7fac44280d7d> References: <20210721161120.24610-7-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210721161120.24610-7-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com> X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Vinay Belgaumkar , Sundaresan Sujaritha , kbuild-all@lists.01.org Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c:217:5: warning: symbol 'slpc_decode_min_freq' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c:229:5: warning: symbol 'slpc_decode_max_freq' was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: kernel test robot --- intel_guc_slpc.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c index 48db2a8f67d1d..372606a451451 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_init(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) return slpc_shared_data_init(slpc); } -u32 slpc_decode_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) +static u32 slpc_decode_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) { struct slpc_shared_data *data = slpc->vaddr; @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ u32 slpc_decode_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER, GEN9_FREQ_SCALER); } -u32 slpc_decode_max_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) +static u32 slpc_decode_max_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) { struct slpc_shared_data *data = slpc->vaddr; From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5AA4C63798 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 18:08:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90B54636A2 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 18:08:25 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 90B54636A2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F7C6EA1A; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 18:08:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6DFD6E983; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 18:08:14 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10053"; a="297278078" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,261,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="297278078" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Jul 2021 11:08:14 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,261,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="577390173" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO d053b881505b) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Jul 2021 11:08:12 -0700 Received: from kbuild by d053b881505b with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m6d7D-0000bk-2r; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 18:08:11 +0000 Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 02:07:22 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Vinay Belgaumkar , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Message-ID: <20210722180722.GA97350@7fac44280d7d> References: <20210721161120.24610-7-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210721161120.24610-7-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com> X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Subject: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: slpc_decode_min_freq() can be static X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c:217:5: warning: symbol 'slpc_decode_min_freq' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c:229:5: warning: symbol 'slpc_decode_max_freq' was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: kernel test robot --- intel_guc_slpc.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c index 48db2a8f67d1d..372606a451451 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_init(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) return slpc_shared_data_init(slpc); } -u32 slpc_decode_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) +static u32 slpc_decode_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) { struct slpc_shared_data *data = slpc->vaddr; @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ u32 slpc_decode_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER, GEN9_FREQ_SCALER); } -u32 slpc_decode_max_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) +static u32 slpc_decode_max_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) { struct slpc_shared_data *data = slpc->vaddr; _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7942300397077548402==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: kernel test robot To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org Subject: [RFC PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: slpc_decode_min_freq() can be static Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 02:07:22 +0800 Message-ID: <20210722180722.GA97350@7fac44280d7d> In-Reply-To: <20210721161120.24610-7-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com> List-Id: --===============7942300397077548402== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c:217:5: warning: symbol 'slpc_de= code_min_freq' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c:229:5: warning: symbol 'slpc_de= code_max_freq' was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: kernel test robot --- intel_guc_slpc.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/= i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c index 48db2a8f67d1d..372606a451451 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_init(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) return slpc_shared_data_init(slpc); } = -u32 slpc_decode_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) +static u32 slpc_decode_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) { struct slpc_shared_data *data =3D slpc->vaddr; = @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ u32 slpc_decode_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER, GEN9_FREQ_SCALER); } = -u32 slpc_decode_max_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) +static u32 slpc_decode_max_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) { struct slpc_shared_data *data =3D slpc->vaddr; =20 --===============7942300397077548402==--