All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>,
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915/gem: Check object_can_migrate from object_migrate
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 12:21:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210723172142.3273510-2-jason@jlekstrand.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210723172142.3273510-1-jason@jlekstrand.net>

We don't roll them together entirely because there are still a couple
cases where we want a separate can_migrate check.  For instance, the
display code checks that you can migrate a buffer to LMEM before it
accepts it in fb_create.  The dma-buf import code also uses it to do an
early check and return a different error code if someone tries to attach
a LMEM-only dma-buf to another driver.

However, no one actually wants to call object_migrate when can_migrate
has failed.  The stated intention is for self-tests but none of those
actually take advantage of this unsafe migration.

Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c        | 13 ++-----------
 .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_migrate.c | 15 ---------------
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
index 5c21cff33199e..d09bd9bdb38ac 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
@@ -584,12 +584,6 @@ bool i915_gem_object_can_migrate(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
  * completed yet, and to accomplish that, i915_gem_object_wait_migration()
  * must be called.
  *
- * This function is a bit more permissive than i915_gem_object_can_migrate()
- * to allow for migrating objects where the caller knows exactly what is
- * happening. For example within selftests. More specifically this
- * function allows migrating I915_BO_ALLOC_USER objects to regions
- * that are not in the list of allowable regions.
- *
  * Note: the @ww parameter is not used yet, but included to make sure
  * callers put some effort into obtaining a valid ww ctx if one is
  * available.
@@ -616,11 +610,8 @@ int i915_gem_object_migrate(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 	if (obj->mm.region == mr)
 		return 0;
 
-	if (!i915_gem_object_evictable(obj))
-		return -EBUSY;
-
-	if (!obj->ops->migrate)
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	if (!i915_gem_object_can_migrate(obj, id))
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	return obj->ops->migrate(obj, mr);
 }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_migrate.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_migrate.c
index 0b7144d2991ca..28a700f08b49a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_migrate.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_migrate.c
@@ -61,11 +61,6 @@ static int igt_create_migrate(struct intel_gt *gt, enum intel_region_id src,
 		if (err)
 			continue;
 
-		if (!i915_gem_object_can_migrate(obj, dst)) {
-			err = -EINVAL;
-			continue;
-		}
-
 		err = i915_gem_object_migrate(obj, &ww, dst);
 		if (err)
 			continue;
@@ -114,11 +109,6 @@ static int lmem_pages_migrate_one(struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
 		return err;
 
 	if (i915_gem_object_is_lmem(obj)) {
-		if (!i915_gem_object_can_migrate(obj, INTEL_REGION_SMEM)) {
-			pr_err("object can't migrate to smem.\n");
-			return -EINVAL;
-		}
-
 		err = i915_gem_object_migrate(obj, ww, INTEL_REGION_SMEM);
 		if (err) {
 			pr_err("Object failed migration to smem\n");
@@ -137,11 +127,6 @@ static int lmem_pages_migrate_one(struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
 		}
 
 	} else {
-		if (!i915_gem_object_can_migrate(obj, INTEL_REGION_LMEM)) {
-			pr_err("object can't migrate to lmem.\n");
-			return -EINVAL;
-		}
-
 		err = i915_gem_object_migrate(obj, ww, INTEL_REGION_LMEM);
 		if (err) {
 			pr_err("Object failed migration to lmem\n");
-- 
2.31.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915/gem: Check object_can_migrate from object_migrate
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 12:21:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210723172142.3273510-2-jason@jlekstrand.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210723172142.3273510-1-jason@jlekstrand.net>

We don't roll them together entirely because there are still a couple
cases where we want a separate can_migrate check.  For instance, the
display code checks that you can migrate a buffer to LMEM before it
accepts it in fb_create.  The dma-buf import code also uses it to do an
early check and return a different error code if someone tries to attach
a LMEM-only dma-buf to another driver.

However, no one actually wants to call object_migrate when can_migrate
has failed.  The stated intention is for self-tests but none of those
actually take advantage of this unsafe migration.

Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c        | 13 ++-----------
 .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_migrate.c | 15 ---------------
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
index 5c21cff33199e..d09bd9bdb38ac 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c
@@ -584,12 +584,6 @@ bool i915_gem_object_can_migrate(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
  * completed yet, and to accomplish that, i915_gem_object_wait_migration()
  * must be called.
  *
- * This function is a bit more permissive than i915_gem_object_can_migrate()
- * to allow for migrating objects where the caller knows exactly what is
- * happening. For example within selftests. More specifically this
- * function allows migrating I915_BO_ALLOC_USER objects to regions
- * that are not in the list of allowable regions.
- *
  * Note: the @ww parameter is not used yet, but included to make sure
  * callers put some effort into obtaining a valid ww ctx if one is
  * available.
@@ -616,11 +610,8 @@ int i915_gem_object_migrate(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 	if (obj->mm.region == mr)
 		return 0;
 
-	if (!i915_gem_object_evictable(obj))
-		return -EBUSY;
-
-	if (!obj->ops->migrate)
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	if (!i915_gem_object_can_migrate(obj, id))
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	return obj->ops->migrate(obj, mr);
 }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_migrate.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_migrate.c
index 0b7144d2991ca..28a700f08b49a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_migrate.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_migrate.c
@@ -61,11 +61,6 @@ static int igt_create_migrate(struct intel_gt *gt, enum intel_region_id src,
 		if (err)
 			continue;
 
-		if (!i915_gem_object_can_migrate(obj, dst)) {
-			err = -EINVAL;
-			continue;
-		}
-
 		err = i915_gem_object_migrate(obj, &ww, dst);
 		if (err)
 			continue;
@@ -114,11 +109,6 @@ static int lmem_pages_migrate_one(struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
 		return err;
 
 	if (i915_gem_object_is_lmem(obj)) {
-		if (!i915_gem_object_can_migrate(obj, INTEL_REGION_SMEM)) {
-			pr_err("object can't migrate to smem.\n");
-			return -EINVAL;
-		}
-
 		err = i915_gem_object_migrate(obj, ww, INTEL_REGION_SMEM);
 		if (err) {
 			pr_err("Object failed migration to smem\n");
@@ -137,11 +127,6 @@ static int lmem_pages_migrate_one(struct i915_gem_ww_ctx *ww,
 		}
 
 	} else {
-		if (!i915_gem_object_can_migrate(obj, INTEL_REGION_LMEM)) {
-			pr_err("object can't migrate to lmem.\n");
-			return -EINVAL;
-		}
-
 		err = i915_gem_object_migrate(obj, ww, INTEL_REGION_LMEM);
 		if (err) {
 			pr_err("Object failed migration to lmem\n");
-- 
2.31.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-23 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-23 17:21 [PATCH 0/8] drm/i915: Migrate memory to SMEM when imported cross-device (v8) Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-23 17:21 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-23 17:21 ` Jason Ekstrand [this message]
2021-07-23 17:21   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drm/i915/gem: Check object_can_migrate from object_migrate Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-23 17:21 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915/gem: Refactor placement setup for i915_gem_object_create* (v2) Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-23 17:21   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-23 17:21 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/i915/gem: Call i915_gem_flush_free_objects() in i915_gem_dumb_create() Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-23 17:21   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-23 17:21 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/i915/gem: Unify user object creation (v3) Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-23 17:21   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-23 17:21 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915/gem/ttm: Only call __i915_gem_object_set_pages if needed Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-23 17:21   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-26  8:08   ` Matthew Auld
2021-07-26  8:08     ` Matthew Auld
2021-07-23 17:21 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/i915/gem: Always call obj->ops->migrate unless can_migrate fails Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-23 17:21   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-26  8:10   ` Matthew Auld
2021-07-26  8:10     ` Matthew Auld
2021-07-23 17:21 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915/gem: Correct the locking and pin pattern for dma-buf (v8) Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-23 17:21   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Ekstrand
2021-09-01 10:18   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-07-23 17:21 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915/gem: Migrate to system at dma-buf attach time (v7) Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-23 17:21   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-23 20:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Migrate memory to SMEM when imported cross-device (rev4) Patchwork
2021-07-23 20:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-07-23 21:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-24  8:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-07-26  8:12 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/8] drm/i915: Migrate memory to SMEM when imported cross-device (v8) Matthew Auld
2021-07-26  8:12   ` Matthew Auld
2021-07-26 15:11   ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-26 15:11     ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-26 15:28     ` Matthew Auld
2021-07-26 15:28       ` Matthew Auld
2021-07-26 15:32       ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-26 15:32         ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-26 15:56         ` Matthew Auld
2021-07-26 15:56           ` Matthew Auld

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210723172142.3273510-2-jason@jlekstrand.net \
    --to=jason@jlekstrand.net \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.