All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: IPSec questions and comments
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 20:01:17 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210724010117.GA633665@minyard.net> (raw)

<herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Bcc: 
Subject: IPSec questions
Reply-To: minyard@acm.org

I've been going through the XFRM code trying to understand it.  I've
been documenting things in the code as I go.

I have a specific usage question, then a general question:

1) In struct xfrm_dst, what is the difference between the route and path
fields?  From what I can tell, in the first element of a bundle they
will both point the route the packet will take after it has been
transformed.  In the other elements of a bundle, route is the same as in
the first element and path will be NULL.  Is this really the intent?
Can path just be eliminated?

2) This code is really hard to understand.  Nobody should have to go
through what I'm going through.  If I can convince my employer to allow
me to submit the comments I'm adding, would that be something acceptable?
It would obviously take a lot of time to review.  If nobody's going to
have the time to review it, I don't need to put forth the extra effort
to make it submittable.

Thanks,

-corey

             reply	other threads:[~2021-07-24  1:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-24  1:01 Corey Minyard [this message]
2021-07-24  2:40 ` IPSec questions and comments Eyal Birger
     [not found] ` <91bce7da-163d-dee3-5309-ebcf27de1abb@gmail.com>
2021-07-24  6:15   ` question about configuring multiple interfaces on a host within the same ipv6 sub-net hui wang
2021-07-25  2:32     ` hui wang
2021-07-26  8:13 ` IPSec questions and comments Steffen Klassert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210724010117.GA633665@minyard.net \
    --to=minyard@acm.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.