All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
	Charles Gorand <charles.gorand@effinnov.com>,
	Krzysztof Opasiak <k.opasiak@samsung.com>,
	Mark Greer <mgreer@animalcreek.com>,
	Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@samsung.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 12/12] nfc: constify nfc_digital_ops
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 23:49:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210724214928.122096-7-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210724214743.121884-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>

Neither the core nor the drivers modify the passed pointer to struct
nfc_digital_ops, so make it a pointer to const for correctness and safety.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/nfc/nfcsim.c      | 2 +-
 drivers/nfc/port100.c     | 2 +-
 drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c | 2 +-
 drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c    | 2 +-
 include/net/nfc/digital.h | 4 ++--
 net/nfc/digital_core.c    | 2 +-
 6 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nfc/nfcsim.c b/drivers/nfc/nfcsim.c
index a9864fcdfba6..143dc49b815b 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/nfcsim.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/nfcsim.c
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static int nfcsim_tg_listen(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, u16 timeout,
 	return nfcsim_send(ddev, NULL, timeout, cb, arg);
 }
 
-static struct nfc_digital_ops nfcsim_digital_ops = {
+static const struct nfc_digital_ops nfcsim_digital_ops = {
 	.in_configure_hw = nfcsim_in_configure_hw,
 	.in_send_cmd = nfcsim_in_send_cmd,
 
diff --git a/drivers/nfc/port100.c b/drivers/nfc/port100.c
index 1d614f9d864a..ccb5c5fab905 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/port100.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/port100.c
@@ -1463,7 +1463,7 @@ static int port100_listen(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, u16 timeout,
 	return port100_tg_send_cmd(ddev, skb, timeout, cb, arg);
 }
 
-static struct nfc_digital_ops port100_digital_ops = {
+static const struct nfc_digital_ops port100_digital_ops = {
 	.in_configure_hw = port100_in_configure_hw,
 	.in_send_cmd = port100_in_send_cmd,
 
diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
index 2dc788c363fd..993818742570 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
@@ -1037,7 +1037,7 @@ static void st95hf_abort_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev)
 {
 }
 
-static struct nfc_digital_ops st95hf_nfc_digital_ops = {
+static const struct nfc_digital_ops st95hf_nfc_digital_ops = {
 	.in_configure_hw = st95hf_in_configure_hw,
 	.in_send_cmd = st95hf_in_send_cmd,
 
diff --git a/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c b/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c
index 33978022ae47..1aed44629aaa 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c
@@ -1861,7 +1861,7 @@ static void trf7970a_abort_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev)
 	mutex_unlock(&trf->lock);
 }
 
-static struct nfc_digital_ops trf7970a_nfc_ops = {
+static const struct nfc_digital_ops trf7970a_nfc_ops = {
 	.in_configure_hw	= trf7970a_in_configure_hw,
 	.in_send_cmd		= trf7970a_send_cmd,
 	.tg_configure_hw	= trf7970a_tg_configure_hw,
diff --git a/include/net/nfc/digital.h b/include/net/nfc/digital.h
index 963db96bcbbb..bb3e8fdc0692 100644
--- a/include/net/nfc/digital.h
+++ b/include/net/nfc/digital.h
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ struct digital_poll_tech {
 
 struct nfc_digital_dev {
 	struct nfc_dev *nfc_dev;
-	struct nfc_digital_ops *ops;
+	const struct nfc_digital_ops *ops;
 
 	u32 protocols;
 
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ struct nfc_digital_dev {
 	void (*skb_add_crc)(struct sk_buff *skb);
 };
 
-struct nfc_digital_dev *nfc_digital_allocate_device(struct nfc_digital_ops *ops,
+struct nfc_digital_dev *nfc_digital_allocate_device(const struct nfc_digital_ops *ops,
 						    __u32 supported_protocols,
 						    __u32 driver_capabilities,
 						    int tx_headroom,
diff --git a/net/nfc/digital_core.c b/net/nfc/digital_core.c
index 8f2572decccd..fefc03674f4f 100644
--- a/net/nfc/digital_core.c
+++ b/net/nfc/digital_core.c
@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ static const struct nfc_ops digital_nfc_ops = {
 	.im_transceive = digital_in_send,
 };
 
-struct nfc_digital_dev *nfc_digital_allocate_device(struct nfc_digital_ops *ops,
+struct nfc_digital_dev *nfc_digital_allocate_device(const struct nfc_digital_ops *ops,
 					    __u32 supported_protocols,
 					    __u32 driver_capabilities,
 					    int tx_headroom, int tx_tailroom)
-- 
2.27.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-24 21:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-24 21:47 [PATCH 00/12] nfc: constify data structures Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-24 21:47 ` [PATCH 01/12] nfc: constify payload argument in nci_send_cmd() Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-24 21:47 ` [PATCH 02/12] nfc: constify nci_ops Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-24 21:47 ` [PATCH 03/12] nfc: s3fwrn5: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-24 21:47 ` [PATCH 04/12] nfc: constify nci_driver_ops (prop_ops and core_ops) Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-24 21:47 ` [PATCH 05/12] nfc: constify nfc_phy_ops Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-24 21:49 ` [PATCH 06/12] nfc: st21nfca: constify file-scope arrays Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-24 21:49 ` [PATCH 07/12] nfc: constify pointer to nfc_vendor_cmd Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-24 21:49 ` [PATCH 08/12] nfc: constify nfc_hci_gate Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-24 21:49 ` [PATCH 09/12] nfc: constify nfc_ops Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-24 21:49 ` [PATCH 10/12] nfc: constify nfc_hci_ops Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-24 21:49 ` [PATCH 11/12] nfc: constify nfc_llc_ops Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-07-24 21:49 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2021-07-25  8:30 ` [PATCH 00/12] nfc: constify data structures patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210724214928.122096-7-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
    --to=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
    --cc=bongsu.jeon@samsung.com \
    --cc=charles.gorand@effinnov.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=k.opasiak@samsung.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgreer@animalcreek.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.