All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: component: Remove misplaced prefix handling in pin control functions
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 20:41:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210726194123.54585-1-broonie@kernel.org> (raw)

When the component level pin control functions were added they for some
no longer obvious reason handled adding prefixing of widget names. This
meant that when the lack of prefix handling in the DAPM level pin
operations was fixed by ae4fc532244b3bb4d (ASoC: dapm: use component
prefix when checking widget names) the one device using the component
level API ended up with the prefix being applied twice, causing all
lookups to fail.

Fix this by removing the redundant prefixing from the component code,
which has the nice side effect of also making that code much simpler.

Reported-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 sound/soc/soc-component.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-component.c b/sound/soc/soc-component.c
index 3a5e84e16a87..c8dfd0de30e4 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-component.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-component.c
@@ -148,86 +148,75 @@ int snd_soc_component_set_bias_level(struct snd_soc_component *component,
 	return soc_component_ret(component, ret);
 }
 
-static int soc_component_pin(struct snd_soc_component *component,
-			     const char *pin,
-			     int (*pin_func)(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm,
-					     const char *pin))
-{
-	struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm =
-		snd_soc_component_get_dapm(component);
-	char *full_name;
-	int ret;
-
-	if (!component->name_prefix) {
-		ret = pin_func(dapm, pin);
-		goto end;
-	}
-
-	full_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s %s", component->name_prefix, pin);
-	if (!full_name) {
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto end;
-	}
-
-	ret = pin_func(dapm, full_name);
-	kfree(full_name);
-end:
-	return soc_component_ret(component, ret);
-}
-
 int snd_soc_component_enable_pin(struct snd_soc_component *component,
 				 const char *pin)
 {
-	return soc_component_pin(component, pin, snd_soc_dapm_enable_pin);
+	struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm =
+		snd_soc_component_get_dapm(component);
+	return snd_soc_dapm_enable_pin(dapm, pin);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_component_enable_pin);
 
 int snd_soc_component_enable_pin_unlocked(struct snd_soc_component *component,
 					  const char *pin)
 {
-	return soc_component_pin(component, pin, snd_soc_dapm_enable_pin_unlocked);
+	struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm =
+		snd_soc_component_get_dapm(component);
+	return snd_soc_dapm_enable_pin_unlocked(dapm, pin);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_component_enable_pin_unlocked);
 
 int snd_soc_component_disable_pin(struct snd_soc_component *component,
 				  const char *pin)
 {
-	return soc_component_pin(component, pin, snd_soc_dapm_disable_pin);
+	struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm =
+		snd_soc_component_get_dapm(component);
+	return snd_soc_dapm_disable_pin(dapm, pin);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_component_disable_pin);
 
 int snd_soc_component_disable_pin_unlocked(struct snd_soc_component *component,
 					   const char *pin)
 {
-	return soc_component_pin(component, pin, snd_soc_dapm_disable_pin_unlocked);
+	struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm = 
+		snd_soc_component_get_dapm(component);
+	return snd_soc_dapm_disable_pin_unlocked(dapm, pin);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_component_disable_pin_unlocked);
 
 int snd_soc_component_nc_pin(struct snd_soc_component *component,
 			     const char *pin)
 {
-	return soc_component_pin(component, pin, snd_soc_dapm_nc_pin);
+	struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm =
+		snd_soc_component_get_dapm(component);
+	return snd_soc_dapm_nc_pin(dapm, pin);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_component_nc_pin);
 
 int snd_soc_component_nc_pin_unlocked(struct snd_soc_component *component,
 				      const char *pin)
 {
-	return soc_component_pin(component, pin, snd_soc_dapm_nc_pin_unlocked);
+	struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm =
+		snd_soc_component_get_dapm(component);
+	return snd_soc_dapm_nc_pin_unlocked(dapm, pin);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_component_nc_pin_unlocked);
 
 int snd_soc_component_get_pin_status(struct snd_soc_component *component,
 				     const char *pin)
 {
-	return soc_component_pin(component, pin, snd_soc_dapm_get_pin_status);
+	struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm =
+		snd_soc_component_get_dapm(component);
+	return snd_soc_dapm_get_pin_status(dapm, pin);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_component_get_pin_status);
 
 int snd_soc_component_force_enable_pin(struct snd_soc_component *component,
 				       const char *pin)
 {
-	return soc_component_pin(component, pin, snd_soc_dapm_force_enable_pin);
+	struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm =
+		snd_soc_component_get_dapm(component);
+	return snd_soc_dapm_force_enable_pin(dapm, pin);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_component_force_enable_pin);
 
@@ -235,7 +224,9 @@ int snd_soc_component_force_enable_pin_unlocked(
 	struct snd_soc_component *component,
 	const char *pin)
 {
-	return soc_component_pin(component, pin, snd_soc_dapm_force_enable_pin_unlocked);
+	struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm =
+		snd_soc_component_get_dapm(component);
+	return snd_soc_dapm_force_enable_pin_unlocked(dapm, pin);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_soc_component_force_enable_pin_unlocked);
 
-- 
2.20.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-07-26 19:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-26 19:41 Mark Brown [this message]
2021-07-28  8:38 ` [PATCH] ASoC: component: Remove misplaced prefix handling in pin control functions Lucas tanure
2021-07-28 23:27 ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210726194123.54585-1-broonie@kernel.org \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=rf@opensource.cirrus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.