All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Seebs" <seebs@seebs.net>
To: "openembedded-core" <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH pseudo 4/4] Do not return address of local variable
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:16:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210728151641.667338a5@seebsdell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17aec78de72.dbb79e7b5562.7908341287383433208@ertelnet.rybnik.pl>

On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 11:36:22 +0200
"Damian Wrobel" <dwrobel@ertelnet.rybnik.pl> wrote:

> Do I correctly assume that pseudo_client_op() has to be fully
> reentrant?

No. It's never been even a tiny bit reentrant. We used to do the
allocate and free thing, and it was incredibly expensive, and the
nature of the thing requires confidence that we never, ever, have
more than one thing writing and reading over the socket at a time,
so it's just Not Reentrant. During one call to pseudo_client_op,
there will never be another, and all the IPC stuff uses a single
consistent local buffer that it returns the address of.

Declaring that as static without changing the initializer would indeed
break everything -- we rely on the initializer working. Changing it to
static means it only gets initialized once...

Changing it to:

	static pseudo_msg_t msg;
	msg = pseudo_msg_t { .type = PSEUDO_MSG_OP };

would probably be fine, because then it'd be initialized. Otherwise,
we'd get failures when msg got overwritten and reused.

Or just changing `result = &msg` to something like `result =
&xattrdb_data`, which would be nonsensical but it turns out not to
matter, as the only caller that reaches this case is the caller
that's just checking yes/no "is the return value not a null pointer".

-s

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-28 20:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-27 11:49 [PATCH pseudo 1/4] Remove -fno-strict-aliasing and -Wno-deprecated-declarations Damian Wrobel
2021-07-27 11:49 ` [PATCH pseudo 2/4] Do not pass null argument to pseudo_diag() Damian Wrobel
2021-07-27 15:48   ` [OE-core] " Seebs
2021-07-27 11:49 ` [PATCH pseudo 3/4] Use -pthread instead of -lpthread Damian Wrobel
2021-07-27 11:49 ` [PATCH pseudo 4/4] Do not return address of local variable Damian Wrobel
2021-07-27 15:47   ` [OE-core] " Seebs
2021-07-27 16:30     ` Damian Wrobel
2021-07-27 16:52       ` Seebs
2021-07-28  9:36         ` Damian Wrobel
2021-07-28 20:16           ` Seebs [this message]
2021-07-28 20:49             ` Andre McCurdy
2021-07-28 20:53               ` Seebs
2021-07-29 12:37             ` [OE-core] [PATCH pseudo 4/4] Do not return address of local variable - unverified Damian Wrobel
2021-07-29 15:08               ` Seebs
2021-07-27 15:49 ` [OE-core] [PATCH pseudo 1/4] Remove -fno-strict-aliasing and -Wno-deprecated-declarations Seebs
2021-07-27 16:35   ` Damian Wrobel
2021-07-27 16:46     ` Seebs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210728151641.667338a5@seebsdell \
    --to=seebs@seebs.net \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --subject='Re: [OE-core] [PATCH pseudo 4/4] Do not return address of local variable' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.