From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0139BC4338F for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 08:24:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54B4610A2 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 08:24:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232767AbhHBIYs (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2021 04:24:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43652 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232562AbhHBIYr (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2021 04:24:47 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x72d.google.com (mail-qk1-x72d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BA9FC06175F; Mon, 2 Aug 2021 01:24:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk1-x72d.google.com with SMTP id t68so15864245qkf.8; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 01:24:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to; bh=ftTeMsaFnDexLSsj0nGTDXOHs2swkIukHz+IHoPpb08=; b=C6cZSCXNc/U/zMxeSznrfNGCQDPT9YaWeg7N83KUpHQbZ9lqWaKc4y1rutI0uqYtox VPwgdxAESB1yAOtySnvc2+qFvTpoTPZsNBU4NiuoYgKF+NeHXQitootbEoJm/Ghhx9gn UVo2GjCg8sWEumHX/8vWA6lck+OGXkEQcl+/jAzHPxYzVu/cm441rheh7jYW8Rfw3fN2 LTHPiRjaoBq5JgB8atin5L2zRw/4KvRoa17Vexso+TXxUeX4OHEVIhDsinNmYQctd7Y8 XsHu5juyI1gWKMKJiiboxPVgZ1PEW8qI2PzifuMLr8j7TDFITmFUzt6b7vxhUm1wyvVx eGYw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to; bh=ftTeMsaFnDexLSsj0nGTDXOHs2swkIukHz+IHoPpb08=; b=bHz3cj0O8qDpSonrCExUbOVVXh2LG0TAZdkz0iIrQZItrOPCCvXwTcWYvqzxWi1e3V 2d320Spg8sd1RPI0z/GwPfItihahebUmEQi4etVbk48/JczR6IcYipGNScBW2hiwWDLt apWAazl7v2cXYpW4bWM3YuoKsBh728Oq/4mtqDynScOGh5SXtpG4WI5bgt1eCXa0gPdE 1FRnl4RcPvCHZeMOY1cXVdrWiGJH9YSnYFwKBoaogxOAjMwi+MPDgef9ttyGUpmS1Kk7 IqYDNvNPR8fsYfUGVAnCE56PVLUIhMmEr+F84WQEZ74OZcDGGjfj2XDrREpat7YHA/Wm EHFQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533tX5hubH/e1LXszqwIXNnFOHWKaoS9q7LKQ3dMA4qVpMADSO/o 8/ObuiMO30d9xAbblaIBegQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzuef6atXq/Y4rgBbRia4RuROrkMmcvKkZwi4YHK3ZuGrSmQ27cOTbRwdc1AP9x9tWnCDXxXg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:903:: with SMTP id v3mr14231864qkv.235.1627892676371; Mon, 02 Aug 2021 01:24:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ec2-35-169-212-159.compute-1.amazonaws.com. [35.169.212.159]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l12sm4427681qtx.45.2021.08.02.01.24.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 02 Aug 2021 01:24:35 -0700 (PDT) From: SeongJae Park X-Google-Original-From: SeongJae Park To: SeongJae Park Cc: Shakeel Butt , Andrew Morton , SeongJae Park , Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, amit@kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , David Hildenbrand , dwmw@amazon.com, foersleo@amazon.de, Greg Thelen , jgowans@amazon.com, mheyne@amazon.de, David Rientjes , sieberf@amazon.com, Vlastimil Babka , linux-damon@amazon.com, Linux MM , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Wei Xu , Paul Turner , Yu Zhao , Dave Hansen Subject: Re: [PATCH v34 00/13] Introduce Data Access MONitor (DAMON) Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 08:24:24 +0000 Message-Id: <20210802082424.19584-1-sjpark@amazon.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20210728083643.5873-1-sjpark@amazon.de> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: SeongJae Park Hello Andrew, On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 08:36:43 +0000 SeongJae Park wrote: [...] > Now all the patches have at least one 'Reviewed-by:' or 'Acked-by:' tags. We > didn't find serious problems since v26[5], which was posted about four months > ago. so I'm thinking this patchset has passed the minimum qualification. If > you think there are more things to be done before this patchset is merged in > the -mm tree or mainline, please let me know. If not, Andrew, I'd like you to > consider merging this patchset into '-mm' tree. I'm wondering if you had a chance to consider that. If you had the chance but this patchset didn't convince you, could you please let me know your concerns so that I can make some progress? Thanks, SeongJae Park [...]