From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.14-rc4-rt4
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 12:20:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210804122029.6c5c837a@oasis.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c3fa07d1-a3c4-6775-f419-4875eb41bc88@kernel.dk>
On Wed, 4 Aug 2021 10:05:39 -0600
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
> So what do you propose in the interim? As far as io_uring is concerned,
> it's not a _huge_ deal to do the IRQ dance, but it does bother me that
> we're making things slightly worse for the mainline kernel just to make
> the out-of-tree patches happy.
Note that the purpose of these patches are to be able to bring those
out-of-tree patches into the kernel such that they are no longer
out-of-tree.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-04 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-02 16:27 [ANNOUNCE] v5.14-rc4-rt4 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-04 8:24 ` Daniel Wagner
2021-08-04 10:43 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-04 10:48 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-04 11:00 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-04 13:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-04 13:32 ` Jens Axboe
2021-08-04 14:23 ` Jens Axboe
2021-08-04 15:33 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-04 15:39 ` Jens Axboe
2021-08-04 15:47 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-04 15:49 ` Jens Axboe
2021-08-04 15:57 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-04 16:05 ` Jens Axboe
2021-08-04 16:20 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-04 16:20 ` Jens Axboe
2021-08-04 16:20 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2021-08-04 16:22 ` Jens Axboe
2021-08-04 16:47 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-04 16:57 ` Jens Axboe
2021-08-04 17:02 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-10 7:40 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-10 11:22 ` [PATCH] io-wq: remove GFP_ATOMIC allocation off schedule out path kernel test robot
2021-08-10 11:22 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-10 15:22 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-10 15:22 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-04 16:17 ` [ANNOUNCE] v5.14-rc4-rt4 Steven Rostedt
2021-08-04 16:22 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-04 16:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-08-04 16:31 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-04 16:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-08-04 16:57 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210804122029.6c5c837a@oasis.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wagi@monom.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.