From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D56AC4338F for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 19:08:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8268460F58 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 19:08:47 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 8268460F58 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:53890 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBijW-0000Fd-N0 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 15:08:46 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35538) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBiic-0006s9-FI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 15:07:50 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:60743) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBiia-0008GI-Qg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 15:07:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1628190467; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=IS5tLtpgcBg2YrUA8MIRQZJJd9m6rhLgpq8wwXmNEOs=; b=PEE9UMX0Y3zZF+D6cMV80ssfoG8GpVzktCgQ4RbN1Rdhfk4AiBNOiVhL97MQTwh/D9zDb7 ZYwn/u/GgSnUNeS8z7peQo0jYtlxIgr17iVfPtmxqD8jOwzRP+Ox+BPCVUzAYHvtWedPgN FSVI48M/xoO9OXMGIBlhshdug3hw8e8= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-299-fRYvGdeCNA-Q5lzXgZe6vw-1; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 15:07:46 -0400 X-MC-Unique: fRYvGdeCNA-Q5lzXgZe6vw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA8DD871807; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 19:07:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.22.11.9]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA7619811; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 19:07:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 15:07:44 -0400 From: Eduardo Habkost To: John Snow Subject: Re: [PATCH for-6.2 01/10] docs: qom: Replace old GTK-Doc #symbol syntax with `symbol` Message-ID: <20210805190744.3icr7j5plndc6uf4@habkost.net> References: <20210729175554.686474-1-ehabkost@redhat.com> <20210729175554.686474-2-ehabkost@redhat.com> <20210804203116.nawhr7px2zhkpzxk@habkost.net> <20210804210034.2dp6b2uqlfxkhjjo@habkost.net> <20210805163611.pvh4p7fkkx6b6kod@habkost.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210805163611.pvh4p7fkkx6b6kod@habkost.net> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=ehabkost@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=ehabkost@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -34 X-Spam_score: -3.5 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.699, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= , QEMU Developers , Paolo Bonzini Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 12:36:11PM -0400, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 08:26:10PM -0400, John Snow wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 5:00 PM Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 09:42:24PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > > > > Is there a sensible default-role we can use as the default for the whole > > > manual, > > > > rather than only declaring it in individual .rst files ? One of the > > > > things I don't > > > > like about the change here is that it means that `thing` in this > > > individual .rst > > > > file is different from `thing` in every other .rst file in our docs. > > > > > > I believe "any" would be a very sensible default role for all > > > documents, but I don't know how to set default-role globally. > > > I'll try to find out. > > > > Oh, I actually fixed that issue I referenced there back in May -- I keep a > > patchset up to date whenever I work on modernizing the QAPI python code > > that actually DOES switch our default role to "any" ... I updated it just > > today, in fact. I will send it to the list if there's an appetite for it > > now. > > If you already have a patch that makes it possible to change the > default role to "any" globally, I'd be glad to include it in v2 > of this series. John had submitted the patches at: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20210805004837.1775306-1-jsnow@redhat.com/ (Thanks!) If John's patches are merged, the only change needed in this series is the removal of the "default-role" line in patch 01/10. Instead of submitting v2 for a one-line change, I'm hoping I can just get Reviewed-by lines for this version. (the reviews can be conditional on the removal of the "default-role" line in patch 01/10) -- Eduardo