> >>> efibootguard-dev is only a build time dependency and > >>> not an runtime dependency. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Quirin Gylstorff > >>> --- > >>>   classes/swupdate-config.bbclass | 2 +- > >>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/classes/swupdate-config.bbclass > >>> b/classes/swupdate-config.bbclass > >>> index dfa3579..e4879c7 100644 > >>> --- a/classes/swupdate-config.bbclass > >>> +++ b/classes/swupdate-config.bbclass > >>> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ KFEATURE_DEPS[luahandler] = "lua" > >>>     KFEATURE_efibootguard = "" > >>>   KFEATURE_efibootguard[BUILD_DEB_DEPENDS] = "efibootguard-dev" > >>> -KFEATURE_efibootguard[DEBIAN_DEPENDS] = "efibootguard-dev" > >>> +KFEATURE_efibootguard[DEBIAN_DEPENDS] = "" > >>>   KFEATURE_efibootguard[DEPENDS] = "efibootguard-dev" > >>>   KFEATURE_efibootguard[KCONFIG_SNIPPETS] = > >>> "file://swupdate_defconfig_efibootguard.snippet" > >>>   > >> > >> -dev makes no sense, but don't we have any dep on libs? Or are they > >> statically linked? > > > > It is statically linked - efibootguard-dev contains only libebgenv.a. > > > > Ah, yeah, part the SWUpdate's problems... Well, meanwhile, this pattern has been deprecated in favor of using https://github.com/sbabic/libubootenv I guess it's about time for EFI Boot Guard to catch up.. Kind regards, Christian -- Dr. Christian Storm Siemens AG, Technology, T RDA IOT SES-DE Otto-Hahn-Ring 6, 81739 München, Germany