From: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
George McCollister <george.mccollister@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 2/4] net: dsa: remove the "dsa_to_port in a loop" antipattern from the core
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 01:04:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210810170447.1517888-1-dqfext@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210810163533.bn7zq2dzcilfm6o5@skbuf>
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 07:35:33PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> If I were to guess where Qingfang was hinting at, is that the receive
> path now needs to iterate over a list, whereas before it simply indexed
> an array:
>
> static inline struct net_device *dsa_master_find_slave(struct net_device *dev,
> int device, int port)
> {
> struct dsa_port *cpu_dp = dev->dsa_ptr;
> struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = cpu_dp->dst;
> struct dsa_port *dp;
>
> list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list)
> if (dp->ds->index == device && dp->index == port &&
> dp->type == DSA_PORT_TYPE_USER)
> return dp->slave;
>
> return NULL;
> }
>
> I will try in the following days to make a prototype implementation of
> converting back the linked list into an array and see if there is any
> justifiable performance improvement.
>
> [ even if this would make the "multiple CPU ports in LAG" implementation
> harder ]
Yes, you got my point.
There is RTL8390M series SoC, which has 52+ ports but a weak CPU (MIPS
34kc 700MHz). In that case the linear lookup time and the potential cache
miss could make a difference.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-10 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-09 19:03 [RFC PATCH net-next 0/4] Remove the "dsa_to_port in a loop" antipattern Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-09 19:03 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/4] net: dsa: introduce a dsa_port_is_unused helper Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-10 9:34 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-08-09 19:03 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/4] net: dsa: remove the "dsa_to_port in a loop" antipattern from the core Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-10 3:33 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-08-10 9:41 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-08-10 11:35 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-10 16:35 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-10 17:04 ` DENG Qingfang [this message]
2021-08-11 17:32 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-10 9:37 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-08-09 19:03 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 3/4] net: dsa: remove the "dsa_to_port in a loop" antipattern from drivers Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-10 0:28 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-09 19:03 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 4/4] net: dsa: b53: express b53_for_each_port in terms of dsa_switch_for_each_port Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-10 9:39 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-08-10 13:14 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-09 19:31 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 0/4] Remove the "dsa_to_port in a loop" antipattern Vladimir Oltean
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210810170447.1517888-1-dqfext@gmail.com \
--to=dqfext@gmail.com \
--cc=Landen.Chao@mediatek.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=george.mccollister@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kurt@linutronix.de \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
--cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.