From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E5BC432BE for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:26:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E3F960FC3 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:26:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237825AbhHKM06 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2021 08:26:58 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:50922 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237835AbhHKMXw (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2021 08:23:52 -0400 Message-ID: <20210811121416.890617399@linutronix.de> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1628684607; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: references:references; bh=xfTiisNqO4bWYKLqxuiAj07QbMu4XhbicsFqzaYisDc=; b=XXqD8yxYG2NxImQqLZsnP1wAAVZJ0EvovrEulw7qW699PC0iab/ISKLAiwcg3wdwT2i5Np WVOMnUOLRr12T7MOYhNcir5OYgdXK4HC9rflod28k21aSRnioTCBrRAZyFDCR9joT1G1uW 6RLt096G0rdcLAgfkBRqIVDPFIB0hqEFmLjG+YCxLXLXl2bcVCb/zg0MOGkJecbbDlW+hG K3TruOey64ntK+ddZGnVzEjiGgqhg0Znd/0agTu2J3tJoW4P/QXucfepnbmolA92xUwC1C exGIeYn42zcfU1hGzuVNoU37NqOKV4KULMvteab89OAMjoctiGHIrfxojDnVtA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1628684607; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: references:references; bh=xfTiisNqO4bWYKLqxuiAj07QbMu4XhbicsFqzaYisDc=; b=8FSY1CwI1262k8B36+6MtiYUwQ767NqlrCX13VmyW/l4stv+mlJqtdkJrhb43pheNPIeX8 N6OVjv3PcwAKvnBw== From: Thomas Gleixner To: LKML Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Juri Lelli , Steven Rostedt , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , Will Deacon , Waiman Long , Boqun Feng , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Davidlohr Bueso , Mike Galbraith Subject: [patch V4 46/68] locking/ww_mutex: Abstract mutex types References: <20210811120348.855823694@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8-bit Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 14:23:27 +0200 (CEST) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Peter Zijlstra Some ww_mutex helper functions use pointers for the underlying mutex and mutex_waiter. The upcoming rtmutex based implementation needs to share these functions. Add and use defines for the types and replace the direct types in the affected functions. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h | 23 +++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) --- --- a/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h +++ b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@ /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ +#define MUTEX mutex +#define MUTEX_WAITER mutex_waiter + static inline struct mutex_waiter * __ww_waiter_first(struct mutex *lock) { @@ -143,7 +146,7 @@ static inline bool * __ww_mutex_check_kill() wake any but the earliest context. */ static bool -__ww_mutex_die(struct mutex *lock, struct mutex_waiter *waiter, +__ww_mutex_die(struct MUTEX *lock, struct MUTEX_WAITER *waiter, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx) { if (!ww_ctx->is_wait_die) @@ -165,7 +168,7 @@ static bool * the lock holders. Even if multiple waiters may wound the lock holder, * it's sufficient that only one does. */ -static bool __ww_mutex_wound(struct mutex *lock, +static bool __ww_mutex_wound(struct MUTEX *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, struct ww_acquire_ctx *hold_ctx) { @@ -220,9 +223,9 @@ static bool __ww_mutex_wound(struct mute * The current task must not be on the wait list. */ static void -__ww_mutex_check_waiters(struct mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx) +__ww_mutex_check_waiters(struct MUTEX *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx) { - struct mutex_waiter *cur; + struct MUTEX_WAITER *cur; lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); @@ -278,7 +281,7 @@ ww_mutex_set_context_fastpath(struct ww_ } static __always_inline int -__ww_mutex_kill(struct mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx) +__ww_mutex_kill(struct MUTEX *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx) { if (ww_ctx->acquired > 0) { #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES @@ -306,12 +309,12 @@ static __always_inline int * look at waiters before us in the wait-list. */ static inline int -__ww_mutex_check_kill(struct mutex *lock, struct mutex_waiter *waiter, +__ww_mutex_check_kill(struct MUTEX *lock, struct MUTEX_WAITER *waiter, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx) { struct ww_mutex *ww = container_of(lock, struct ww_mutex, base); struct ww_acquire_ctx *hold_ctx = READ_ONCE(ww->ctx); - struct mutex_waiter *cur; + struct MUTEX_WAITER *cur; if (ctx->acquired == 0) return 0; @@ -354,11 +357,11 @@ static inline int * Wound-Wait ensure we wound the owning context when it is younger. */ static inline int -__ww_mutex_add_waiter(struct mutex_waiter *waiter, - struct mutex *lock, +__ww_mutex_add_waiter(struct MUTEX_WAITER *waiter, + struct MUTEX *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx) { - struct mutex_waiter *cur, *pos = NULL; + struct MUTEX_WAITER *cur, *pos = NULL; bool is_wait_die; if (!ww_ctx) {