On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 08:13:13PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:

> Mark arch_lmb_reserve() weak on architecture level, so it can be
> overridden if necessary. This might be necessary if there is some
> sort of architectural exception where e.g. more LMB areas have to
> be reserved.
> 
> Note that sandbox now needs an empty implementation of
> arch_lmb_reserve().

I'm not sure we need this.  We have the arch and board call-outs, and
I've already addressed the imx example.  I really want to see how this
works on the I believe you've said rcar example.

-- 
Tom