All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: [patch V5 14/72] rtmutex: Split API and implementation
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2021 23:27:57 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210815211302.726560996@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20210815203225.710392609@linutronix.de

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Prepare for reusing the inner functions of rtmutex for RT lock
substitutions.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 kernel/locking/Makefile         |    2 
 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c        |  479 +---------------------------------------
 kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c    |  453 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h |   78 +++---
 4 files changed, 514 insertions(+), 498 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
---
--- a/kernel/locking/Makefile
+++ b/kernel/locking/Makefile
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += spinlock.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_LOCK_SPIN_ON_OWNER) += osq_lock.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) += spinlock.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS) += qspinlock.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES) += rtmutex.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES) += rtmutex_api.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK) += spinlock.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK) += spinlock_debug.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_QUEUED_RWLOCKS) += qrwlock.o
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -11,14 +11,12 @@
  *
  *  See Documentation/locking/rt-mutex-design.rst for details.
  */
-#include <linux/spinlock.h>
-#include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/sched/debug.h>
+#include <linux/sched/deadline.h>
 #include <linux/sched/signal.h>
 #include <linux/sched/rt.h>
-#include <linux/sched/deadline.h>
 #include <linux/sched/wake_q.h>
-#include <linux/sched/debug.h>
-#include <linux/timer.h>
 
 #include "rtmutex_common.h"
 
@@ -371,11 +369,6 @@ rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(struct rt_
 	return chwalk == RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK;
 }
 
-/*
- * Max number of times we'll walk the boosting chain:
- */
-int max_lock_depth = 1024;
-
 static __always_inline struct rt_mutex *task_blocked_on_lock(struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	return p->pi_blocked_on ? p->pi_blocked_on->lock : NULL;
@@ -1112,42 +1105,6 @@ static void __sched remove_waiter(struct
 	raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
 }
 
-/*
- * Recheck the pi chain, in case we got a priority setting
- *
- * Called from sched_setscheduler
- */
-void __sched rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *task)
-{
-	struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter;
-	struct rt_mutex *next_lock;
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
-
-	waiter = task->pi_blocked_on;
-	if (!waiter || rt_mutex_waiter_equal(waiter, task_to_waiter(task))) {
-		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
-		return;
-	}
-	next_lock = waiter->lock;
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
-
-	/* gets dropped in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain()! */
-	get_task_struct(task);
-
-	rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(task, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, NULL,
-				   next_lock, NULL, task);
-}
-
-void __sched rt_mutex_init_waiter(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
-{
-	debug_rt_mutex_init_waiter(waiter);
-	RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree_entry);
-	RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->tree_entry);
-	waiter->task = NULL;
-}
-
 /**
  * __rt_mutex_slowlock() - Perform the wait-wake-try-to-take loop
  * @lock:		 the rt_mutex to take
@@ -1274,6 +1231,15 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock(str
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static __always_inline int __rt_mutex_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+					   unsigned int state)
+{
+	if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current)))
+		return 0;
+
+	return rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, state, NULL, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK);
+}
+
 static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowtrylock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
 {
 	int ret = try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, NULL);
@@ -1316,21 +1282,16 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_slowtrylock(
 	return ret;
 }
 
-/*
- * Performs the wakeup of the top-waiter and re-enables preemption.
- */
-void __sched rt_mutex_postunlock(struct wake_q_head *wake_q)
+static __always_inline int __rt_mutex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
 {
-	wake_up_q(wake_q);
+	if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current)))
+		return 1;
 
-	/* Pairs with preempt_disable() in mark_wakeup_next_waiter() */
-	preempt_enable();
+	return rt_mutex_slowtrylock(lock);
 }
 
 /*
  * Slow path to release a rt-mutex.
- *
- * Return whether the current task needs to call rt_mutex_postunlock().
  */
 static void __sched rt_mutex_slowunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
 {
@@ -1393,416 +1354,10 @@ static void __sched rt_mutex_slowunlock(
 	rt_mutex_postunlock(&wake_q);
 }
 
-/*
- * debug aware fast / slowpath lock,trylock,unlock
- *
- * The atomic acquire/release ops are compiled away, when either the
- * architecture does not support cmpxchg or when debugging is enabled.
- */
-static __always_inline int __rt_mutex_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, long state,
-					   unsigned int subclass)
-{
-	int ret;
-
-	might_sleep();
-	mutex_acquire(&lock->dep_map, subclass, 0, _RET_IP_);
-
-	if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current)))
-		return 0;
-
-	ret = rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, state, NULL, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK);
-	if (ret)
-		mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
-	return ret;
-}
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
-/**
- * rt_mutex_lock_nested - lock a rt_mutex
- *
- * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
- * @subclass: the lockdep subclass
- */
-void __sched rt_mutex_lock_nested(struct rt_mutex *lock, unsigned int subclass)
-{
-	__rt_mutex_lock(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, subclass);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock_nested);
-
-#else /* !CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
-
-/**
- * rt_mutex_lock - lock a rt_mutex
- *
- * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
- */
-void __sched rt_mutex_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
-{
-	__rt_mutex_lock(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, 0);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock);
-#endif
-
-/**
- * rt_mutex_lock_interruptible - lock a rt_mutex interruptible
- *
- * @lock:		the rt_mutex to be locked
- *
- * Returns:
- *  0		on success
- * -EINTR	when interrupted by a signal
- */
-int __sched rt_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct rt_mutex *lock)
-{
-	return __rt_mutex_lock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, 0);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock_interruptible);
-
-/**
- * rt_mutex_trylock - try to lock a rt_mutex
- *
- * @lock:	the rt_mutex to be locked
- *
- * This function can only be called in thread context. It's safe to call it
- * from atomic regions, but not from hard or soft interrupt context.
- *
- * Returns:
- *  1 on success
- *  0 on contention
- */
-int __sched rt_mutex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+static __always_inline void __rt_mutex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
 {
-	int ret;
-
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES) && WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_task()))
-		return 0;
-
-	/*
-	 * No lockdep annotation required because lockdep disables the fast
-	 * path.
-	 */
-	if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current)))
-		return 1;
-
-	ret = rt_mutex_slowtrylock(lock);
-	if (ret)
-		mutex_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
-
-	return ret;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_trylock);
-
-/**
- * rt_mutex_unlock - unlock a rt_mutex
- *
- * @lock: the rt_mutex to be unlocked
- */
-void __sched rt_mutex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
-{
-	mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
 	if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(lock, current, NULL)))
 		return;
 
 	rt_mutex_slowunlock(lock);
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_unlock);
-
-/*
- * Futex variants, must not use fastpath.
- */
-int __sched rt_mutex_futex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
-{
-	return rt_mutex_slowtrylock(lock);
-}
-
-int __sched __rt_mutex_futex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
-{
-	return __rt_mutex_slowtrylock(lock);
-}
-
-/**
- * __rt_mutex_futex_unlock - Futex variant, that since futex variants
- * do not use the fast-path, can be simple and will not need to retry.
- *
- * @lock:	The rt_mutex to be unlocked
- * @wake_q:	The wake queue head from which to get the next lock waiter
- */
-bool __sched __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
-				     struct wake_q_head *wake_q)
-{
-	lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock);
-
-	debug_rt_mutex_unlock(lock);
-
-	if (!rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) {
-		lock->owner = NULL;
-		return false; /* done */
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * We've already deboosted, mark_wakeup_next_waiter() will
-	 * retain preempt_disabled when we drop the wait_lock, to
-	 * avoid inversion prior to the wakeup.  preempt_disable()
-	 * therein pairs with rt_mutex_postunlock().
-	 */
-	mark_wakeup_next_waiter(wake_q, lock);
-
-	return true; /* call postunlock() */
-}
-
-void __sched rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
-{
-	DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
-	unsigned long flags;
-	bool postunlock;
-
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
-	postunlock = __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(lock, &wake_q);
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
-
-	if (postunlock)
-		rt_mutex_postunlock(&wake_q);
-}
-
-/**
- * __rt_mutex_init - initialize the rt_mutex
- *
- * @lock:	The rt_mutex to be initialized
- * @name:	The lock name used for debugging
- * @key:	The lock class key used for debugging
- *
- * Initialize the rt_mutex to unlocked state.
- *
- * Initializing of a locked rt_mutex is not allowed
- */
-void __sched __rt_mutex_init(struct rt_mutex *lock, const char *name,
-		     struct lock_class_key *key)
-{
-	debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)lock, sizeof(*lock));
-	lockdep_init_map_wait(&lock->dep_map, name, key, 0, LD_WAIT_SLEEP);
-
-	__rt_mutex_basic_init(lock);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rt_mutex_init);
-
-/**
- * rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked - initialize and lock a rt_mutex on behalf of a
- *				proxy owner
- *
- * @lock:	the rt_mutex to be locked
- * @proxy_owner:the task to set as owner
- *
- * No locking. Caller has to do serializing itself
- *
- * Special API call for PI-futex support. This initializes the rtmutex and
- * assigns it to @proxy_owner. Concurrent operations on the rtmutex are not
- * possible at this point because the pi_state which contains the rtmutex
- * is not yet visible to other tasks.
- */
-void __sched rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(struct rt_mutex *lock,
-					struct task_struct *proxy_owner)
-{
-	__rt_mutex_basic_init(lock);
-	rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, proxy_owner);
-}
-
-/**
- * rt_mutex_proxy_unlock - release a lock on behalf of owner
- *
- * @lock:	the rt_mutex to be locked
- *
- * No locking. Caller has to do serializing itself
- *
- * Special API call for PI-futex support. This merrily cleans up the rtmutex
- * (debugging) state. Concurrent operations on this rt_mutex are not
- * possible because it belongs to the pi_state which is about to be freed
- * and it is not longer visible to other tasks.
- */
-void __sched rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
-{
-	debug_rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(lock);
-	rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, NULL);
-}
-
-/**
- * __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() - Start lock acquisition for another task
- * @lock:		the rt_mutex to take
- * @waiter:		the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
- * @task:		the task to prepare
- *
- * Starts the rt_mutex acquire; it enqueues the @waiter and does deadlock
- * detection. It does not wait, see rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() for that.
- *
- * NOTE: does _NOT_ remove the @waiter on failure; must either call
- * rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() or rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock() after this.
- *
- * Returns:
- *  0 - task blocked on lock
- *  1 - acquired the lock for task, caller should wake it up
- * <0 - error
- *
- * Special API call for PI-futex support.
- */
-int __sched __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
-					struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
-					struct task_struct *task)
-{
-	int ret;
-
-	lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock);
-
-	if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, task, NULL))
-		return 1;
-
-	/* We enforce deadlock detection for futexes */
-	ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task,
-				      RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK);
-
-	if (ret && !rt_mutex_owner(lock)) {
-		/*
-		 * Reset the return value. We might have
-		 * returned with -EDEADLK and the owner
-		 * released the lock while we were walking the
-		 * pi chain.  Let the waiter sort it out.
-		 */
-		ret = 0;
-	}
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
-/**
- * rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() - Start lock acquisition for another task
- * @lock:		the rt_mutex to take
- * @waiter:		the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
- * @task:		the task to prepare
- *
- * Starts the rt_mutex acquire; it enqueues the @waiter and does deadlock
- * detection. It does not wait, see rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() for that.
- *
- * NOTE: unlike __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock this _DOES_ remove the @waiter
- * on failure.
- *
- * Returns:
- *  0 - task blocked on lock
- *  1 - acquired the lock for task, caller should wake it up
- * <0 - error
- *
- * Special API call for PI-futex support.
- */
-int __sched rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
-				      struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
-				      struct task_struct *task)
-{
-	int ret;
-
-	raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
-	ret = __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(lock, waiter, task);
-	if (unlikely(ret))
-		remove_waiter(lock, waiter);
-	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
-/**
- * rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() - Wait for lock acquisition
- * @lock:		the rt_mutex we were woken on
- * @to:			the timeout, null if none. hrtimer should already have
- *			been started.
- * @waiter:		the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
- *
- * Wait for the lock acquisition started on our behalf by
- * rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(). Upon failure, the caller must call
- * rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock().
- *
- * Returns:
- *  0 - success
- * <0 - error, one of -EINTR, -ETIMEDOUT
- *
- * Special API call for PI-futex support
- */
-int __sched rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
-				     struct hrtimer_sleeper *to,
-				     struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
-{
-	int ret;
-
-	raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
-	/* sleep on the mutex */
-	set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
-	ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, to, waiter);
-	/*
-	 * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit unconditionally. We might
-	 * have to fix that up.
-	 */
-	fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
-	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
-/**
- * rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock() - Cleanup failed lock acquisition
- * @lock:		the rt_mutex we were woken on
- * @waiter:		the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
- *
- * Attempt to clean up after a failed __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() or
- * rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock().
- *
- * Unless we acquired the lock; we're still enqueued on the wait-list and can
- * in fact still be granted ownership until we're removed. Therefore we can
- * find we are in fact the owner and must disregard the
- * rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() failure.
- *
- * Returns:
- *  true  - did the cleanup, we done.
- *  false - we acquired the lock after rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() returned,
- *          caller should disregards its return value.
- *
- * Special API call for PI-futex support
- */
-bool __sched rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
-					 struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
-{
-	bool cleanup = false;
-
-	raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
-	/*
-	 * Do an unconditional try-lock, this deals with the lock stealing
-	 * state where __rt_mutex_futex_unlock() -> mark_wakeup_next_waiter()
-	 * sets a NULL owner.
-	 *
-	 * We're not interested in the return value, because the subsequent
-	 * test on rt_mutex_owner() will infer that. If the trylock succeeded,
-	 * we will own the lock and it will have removed the waiter. If we
-	 * failed the trylock, we're still not owner and we need to remove
-	 * ourselves.
-	 */
-	try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, waiter);
-	/*
-	 * Unless we're the owner; we're still enqueued on the wait_list.
-	 * So check if we became owner, if not, take us off the wait_list.
-	 */
-	if (rt_mutex_owner(lock) != current) {
-		remove_waiter(lock, waiter);
-		cleanup = true;
-	}
-	/*
-	 * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit unconditionally. We might
-	 * have to fix that up.
-	 */
-	fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
-
-	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
-
-	return cleanup;
-}
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES
-void rt_mutex_debug_task_free(struct task_struct *task)
-{
-	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&task->pi_waiters.rb_root));
-	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(task->pi_blocked_on);
-}
-#endif
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
@@ -0,0 +1,453 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * rtmutex API
+ */
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/export.h>
+
+#include "rtmutex.c"
+
+/*
+ * Max number of times we'll walk the boosting chain:
+ */
+int max_lock_depth = 1024;
+
+/*
+ * Debug aware fast / slowpath lock,trylock,unlock
+ *
+ * The atomic acquire/release ops are compiled away, when either the
+ * architecture does not support cmpxchg or when debugging is enabled.
+ */
+static __always_inline int __rt_mutex_lock_common(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+						  unsigned int state,
+						  unsigned int subclass)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	might_sleep();
+	mutex_acquire(&lock->dep_map, subclass, 0, _RET_IP_);
+	ret = __rt_mutex_lock(lock, state);
+	if (ret)
+		mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+/**
+ * rt_mutex_lock_nested - lock a rt_mutex
+ *
+ * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
+ * @subclass: the lockdep subclass
+ */
+void __sched rt_mutex_lock_nested(struct rt_mutex *lock, unsigned int subclass)
+{
+	__rt_mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, subclass);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock_nested);
+
+#else /* !CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
+
+/**
+ * rt_mutex_lock - lock a rt_mutex
+ *
+ * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
+ */
+void __sched rt_mutex_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+{
+	__rt_mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, 0);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock);
+#endif
+
+/**
+ * rt_mutex_lock_interruptible - lock a rt_mutex interruptible
+ *
+ * @lock:		the rt_mutex to be locked
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ *  0		on success
+ * -EINTR	when interrupted by a signal
+ */
+int __sched rt_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+{
+	return __rt_mutex_lock_common(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, 0);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock_interruptible);
+
+/**
+ * rt_mutex_trylock - try to lock a rt_mutex
+ *
+ * @lock:	the rt_mutex to be locked
+ *
+ * This function can only be called in thread context. It's safe to call it
+ * from atomic regions, but not from hard or soft interrupt context.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ *  1 on success
+ *  0 on contention
+ */
+int __sched rt_mutex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES) && WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_task()))
+		return 0;
+
+	ret = __rt_mutex_trylock(lock);
+	if (ret)
+		mutex_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_trylock);
+
+/**
+ * rt_mutex_unlock - unlock a rt_mutex
+ *
+ * @lock: the rt_mutex to be unlocked
+ */
+void __sched rt_mutex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+{
+	mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
+	__rt_mutex_unlock(lock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_unlock);
+
+/*
+ * Futex variants, must not use fastpath.
+ */
+int __sched rt_mutex_futex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+{
+	return rt_mutex_slowtrylock(lock);
+}
+
+int __sched __rt_mutex_futex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+{
+	return __rt_mutex_slowtrylock(lock);
+}
+
+/**
+ * __rt_mutex_futex_unlock - Futex variant, that since futex variants
+ * do not use the fast-path, can be simple and will not need to retry.
+ *
+ * @lock:	The rt_mutex to be unlocked
+ * @wake_q:	The wake queue head from which to get the next lock waiter
+ */
+bool __sched __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+				     struct wake_q_head *wake_q)
+{
+	lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock);
+
+	debug_rt_mutex_unlock(lock);
+
+	if (!rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) {
+		lock->owner = NULL;
+		return false; /* done */
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * We've already deboosted, mark_wakeup_next_waiter() will
+	 * retain preempt_disabled when we drop the wait_lock, to
+	 * avoid inversion prior to the wakeup.  preempt_disable()
+	 * therein pairs with rt_mutex_postunlock().
+	 */
+	mark_wakeup_next_waiter(wake_q, lock);
+
+	return true; /* call postunlock() */
+}
+
+void __sched rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+{
+	DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
+	unsigned long flags;
+	bool postunlock;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
+	postunlock = __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(lock, &wake_q);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
+
+	if (postunlock)
+		rt_mutex_postunlock(&wake_q);
+}
+
+/**
+ * __rt_mutex_init - initialize the rt_mutex
+ *
+ * @lock:	The rt_mutex to be initialized
+ * @name:	The lock name used for debugging
+ * @key:	The lock class key used for debugging
+ *
+ * Initialize the rt_mutex to unlocked state.
+ *
+ * Initializing of a locked rt_mutex is not allowed
+ */
+void __sched __rt_mutex_init(struct rt_mutex *lock, const char *name,
+		     struct lock_class_key *key)
+{
+	debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)lock, sizeof(*lock));
+	lockdep_init_map_wait(&lock->dep_map, name, key, 0, LD_WAIT_SLEEP);
+
+	__rt_mutex_basic_init(lock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rt_mutex_init);
+
+/**
+ * rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked - initialize and lock a rt_mutex on behalf of a
+ *				proxy owner
+ *
+ * @lock:	the rt_mutex to be locked
+ * @proxy_owner:the task to set as owner
+ *
+ * No locking. Caller has to do serializing itself
+ *
+ * Special API call for PI-futex support. This initializes the rtmutex and
+ * assigns it to @proxy_owner. Concurrent operations on the rtmutex are not
+ * possible at this point because the pi_state which contains the rtmutex
+ * is not yet visible to other tasks.
+ */
+void __sched rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+					struct task_struct *proxy_owner)
+{
+	__rt_mutex_basic_init(lock);
+	rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, proxy_owner);
+}
+
+/**
+ * rt_mutex_proxy_unlock - release a lock on behalf of owner
+ *
+ * @lock:	the rt_mutex to be locked
+ *
+ * No locking. Caller has to do serializing itself
+ *
+ * Special API call for PI-futex support. This just cleans up the rtmutex
+ * (debugging) state. Concurrent operations on this rt_mutex are not
+ * possible because it belongs to the pi_state which is about to be freed
+ * and it is not longer visible to other tasks.
+ */
+void __sched rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+{
+	debug_rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(lock);
+	rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, NULL);
+}
+
+/**
+ * __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() - Start lock acquisition for another task
+ * @lock:		the rt_mutex to take
+ * @waiter:		the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
+ * @task:		the task to prepare
+ *
+ * Starts the rt_mutex acquire; it enqueues the @waiter and does deadlock
+ * detection. It does not wait, see rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() for that.
+ *
+ * NOTE: does _NOT_ remove the @waiter on failure; must either call
+ * rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() or rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock() after this.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ *  0 - task blocked on lock
+ *  1 - acquired the lock for task, caller should wake it up
+ * <0 - error
+ *
+ * Special API call for PI-futex support.
+ */
+int __sched __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+					struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
+					struct task_struct *task)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock);
+
+	if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, task, NULL))
+		return 1;
+
+	/* We enforce deadlock detection for futexes */
+	ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task,
+				      RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK);
+
+	if (ret && !rt_mutex_owner(lock)) {
+		/*
+		 * Reset the return value. We might have
+		 * returned with -EDEADLK and the owner
+		 * released the lock while we were walking the
+		 * pi chain.  Let the waiter sort it out.
+		 */
+		ret = 0;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() - Start lock acquisition for another task
+ * @lock:		the rt_mutex to take
+ * @waiter:		the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
+ * @task:		the task to prepare
+ *
+ * Starts the rt_mutex acquire; it enqueues the @waiter and does deadlock
+ * detection. It does not wait, see rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() for that.
+ *
+ * NOTE: unlike __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock this _DOES_ remove the @waiter
+ * on failure.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ *  0 - task blocked on lock
+ *  1 - acquired the lock for task, caller should wake it up
+ * <0 - error
+ *
+ * Special API call for PI-futex support.
+ */
+int __sched rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+				      struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
+				      struct task_struct *task)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
+	ret = __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(lock, waiter, task);
+	if (unlikely(ret))
+		remove_waiter(lock, waiter);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() - Wait for lock acquisition
+ * @lock:		the rt_mutex we were woken on
+ * @to:			the timeout, null if none. hrtimer should already have
+ *			been started.
+ * @waiter:		the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
+ *
+ * Wait for the lock acquisition started on our behalf by
+ * rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(). Upon failure, the caller must call
+ * rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock().
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ *  0 - success
+ * <0 - error, one of -EINTR, -ETIMEDOUT
+ *
+ * Special API call for PI-futex support
+ */
+int __sched rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+				     struct hrtimer_sleeper *to,
+				     struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
+	/* sleep on the mutex */
+	set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+	ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, to, waiter);
+	/*
+	 * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit unconditionally. We might
+	 * have to fix that up.
+	 */
+	fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock() - Cleanup failed lock acquisition
+ * @lock:		the rt_mutex we were woken on
+ * @waiter:		the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
+ *
+ * Attempt to clean up after a failed __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() or
+ * rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock().
+ *
+ * Unless we acquired the lock; we're still enqueued on the wait-list and can
+ * in fact still be granted ownership until we're removed. Therefore we can
+ * find we are in fact the owner and must disregard the
+ * rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() failure.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ *  true  - did the cleanup, we done.
+ *  false - we acquired the lock after rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() returned,
+ *          caller should disregards its return value.
+ *
+ * Special API call for PI-futex support
+ */
+bool __sched rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+					 struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
+{
+	bool cleanup = false;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
+	/*
+	 * Do an unconditional try-lock, this deals with the lock stealing
+	 * state where __rt_mutex_futex_unlock() -> mark_wakeup_next_waiter()
+	 * sets a NULL owner.
+	 *
+	 * We're not interested in the return value, because the subsequent
+	 * test on rt_mutex_owner() will infer that. If the trylock succeeded,
+	 * we will own the lock and it will have removed the waiter. If we
+	 * failed the trylock, we're still not owner and we need to remove
+	 * ourselves.
+	 */
+	try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, waiter);
+	/*
+	 * Unless we're the owner; we're still enqueued on the wait_list.
+	 * So check if we became owner, if not, take us off the wait_list.
+	 */
+	if (rt_mutex_owner(lock) != current) {
+		remove_waiter(lock, waiter);
+		cleanup = true;
+	}
+	/*
+	 * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit unconditionally. We might
+	 * have to fix that up.
+	 */
+	fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
+
+	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
+
+	return cleanup;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Recheck the pi chain, in case we got a priority setting
+ *
+ * Called from sched_setscheduler
+ */
+void __sched rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+	struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter;
+	struct rt_mutex *next_lock;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
+
+	waiter = task->pi_blocked_on;
+	if (!waiter || rt_mutex_waiter_equal(waiter, task_to_waiter(task))) {
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
+		return;
+	}
+	next_lock = waiter->lock;
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
+
+	/* gets dropped in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain()! */
+	get_task_struct(task);
+
+	rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(task, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, NULL,
+				   next_lock, NULL, task);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Performs the wakeup of the top-waiter and re-enables preemption.
+ */
+void __sched rt_mutex_postunlock(struct wake_q_head *wake_q)
+{
+	wake_up_q(wake_q);
+
+	/* Pairs with preempt_disable() in mark_wakeup_next_waiter() */
+	preempt_enable();
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES
+void rt_mutex_debug_task_free(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&task->pi_waiters.rb_root));
+	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(task->pi_blocked_on);
+}
+#endif
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
@@ -38,6 +38,33 @@ struct rt_mutex_waiter {
 };
 
 /*
+ * PI-futex support (proxy locking functions, etc.):
+ */
+extern void rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+				       struct task_struct *proxy_owner);
+extern void rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock);
+extern int __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+				     struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
+				     struct task_struct *task);
+extern int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+				     struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
+				     struct task_struct *task);
+extern int rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+			       struct hrtimer_sleeper *to,
+			       struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter);
+extern bool rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+				 struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter);
+
+extern int rt_mutex_futex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *l);
+extern int __rt_mutex_futex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *l);
+
+extern void rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock);
+extern bool __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
+				struct wake_q_head *wake_q);
+
+extern void rt_mutex_postunlock(struct wake_q_head *wake_q);
+
+/*
  * Must be guarded because this header is included from rcu/tree_plugin.h
  * unconditionally.
  */
@@ -78,13 +105,6 @@ static inline struct task_struct *rt_mut
 
 	return (struct task_struct *) (owner & ~RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS);
 }
-#else /* CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES */
-/* Used in rcu/tree_plugin.h */
-static inline struct task_struct *rt_mutex_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock)
-{
-	return NULL;
-}
-#endif  /* !CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES */
 
 /*
  * Constants for rt mutex functions which have a selectable deadlock
@@ -108,34 +128,6 @@ static inline void __rt_mutex_basic_init
 	lock->waiters = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
 }
 
-/*
- * PI-futex support (proxy locking functions, etc.):
- */
-extern void rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(struct rt_mutex *lock,
-				       struct task_struct *proxy_owner);
-extern void rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock);
-extern void rt_mutex_init_waiter(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter);
-extern int __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
-				     struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
-				     struct task_struct *task);
-extern int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
-				     struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
-				     struct task_struct *task);
-extern int rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
-			       struct hrtimer_sleeper *to,
-			       struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter);
-extern bool rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
-				 struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter);
-
-extern int rt_mutex_futex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *l);
-extern int __rt_mutex_futex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *l);
-
-extern void rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock);
-extern bool __rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
-				 struct wake_q_head *wqh);
-
-extern void rt_mutex_postunlock(struct wake_q_head *wake_q);
-
 /* Debug functions */
 static inline void debug_rt_mutex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
 {
@@ -161,4 +153,20 @@ static inline void debug_rt_mutex_free_w
 		memset(waiter, 0x22, sizeof(*waiter));
 }
 
+static inline void rt_mutex_init_waiter(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
+{
+	debug_rt_mutex_init_waiter(waiter);
+	RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree_entry);
+	RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->tree_entry);
+	waiter->task = NULL;
+}
+
+#else /* CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES */
+/* Used in rcu/tree_plugin.h */
+static inline struct task_struct *rt_mutex_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+{
+	return NULL;
+}
+#endif  /* !CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES */
+
 #endif


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-15 21:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 160+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-15 21:27 [patch V5 00/72] locking, sched: The PREEMPT-RT locking infrastructure Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:27 ` [patch V5 01/72] locking/local_lock: Add missing owner initialization Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:27 ` [patch V5 02/72] locking/rtmutex: Set proper wait context for lockdep Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:27 ` [patch V5 03/72] sched: Split out the wakeup state check Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] sched/wakeup: Split out the wakeup ->__state check tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:27 ` [patch V5 04/72] sched: Introduce TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] sched/wakeup: Introduce the TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT state bit tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:27 ` [patch V5 05/72] sched: Reorganize current::__state helpers Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] sched/wakeup: Reorganize the " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:27 ` [patch V5 06/72] sched: Prepare for RT sleeping spin/rwlocks Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] sched/wakeup: " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:27 ` [patch V5 07/72] sched: Rework the __schedule() preempt argument Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] sched/core: " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:27 ` [patch V5 08/72] sched: Provide schedule point for RT locks Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] sched/core: Provide a scheduling " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:27 ` [patch V5 09/72] sched/wake_q: Provide WAKE_Q_HEAD_INITIALIZER Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] sched/wake_q: Provide WAKE_Q_HEAD_INITIALIZER() tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:27 ` [patch V5 10/72] media/atomisp: Use lockdep instead of *mutex_is_locked() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-15 21:27 ` [patch V5 11/72] rtmutex: Remove rt_mutex_is_locked() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] locking/rtmutex: " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-15 21:27 ` [patch V5 12/72] rtmutex: Convert macros to inlines Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] locking/rtmutex: " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-15 21:27 ` [patch V5 13/72] rtmutex: Switch to try_cmpxchg() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] locking/rtmutex: Switch to from cmpxchg_*() to try_cmpxchg_*() tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:27 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] locking/rtmutex: Split API from implementation tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:27 ` [patch V5 15/72] rtmutex: Split out the inner parts of struct rtmutex Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] locking/rtmutex: Split out the inner parts of 'struct rtmutex' tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 16/72] locking/rtmutex: Provide rt_mutex_slowlock_locked() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 17/72] rtmutex: Provide rt_mutex_base_is_locked() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] locking/rtmutex: " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 18/72] locking: Add base code for RT rw_semaphore and rwlock Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-16  5:00   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] locking/rt: " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 19/72] locking/rwsem: Add rtmutex based R/W semaphore implementation Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 20/72] locking/rtmutex: Add wake_state to rt_mutex_waiter Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 21/72] locking/rtmutex: Provide rt_wake_q and helpers Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] locking/rtmutex: Provide rt_wake_q_head " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 22/72] locking/rtmutex: Use rt_mutex_wake_q_head Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 23/72] locking/rtmutex: Prepare RT rt_mutex_wake_q for RT locks Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 24/72] locking/rtmutex: Guard regular sleeping locks specific functions Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 25/72] locking/spinlock: Split the lock types header Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] locking/spinlock: Split the lock types header, and move the raw types into <linux/spinlock_types_raw.h> tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 26/72] locking/rtmutex: Prevent future include recursion hell Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 27/72] locking/lockdep: Reduce includes in debug_locks.h Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] locking/lockdep: Reduce header dependencies in <linux/debug_locks.h> tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 28/72] rbtree: Split out the rbtree type definitions Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] rbtree: Split out the rbtree type definitions into <linux/rbtree_types.h> tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 29/72] locking/rtmutex: Include only rbtree types Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] locking/rtmutex: Reduce <linux/rtmutex.h> header dependencies, only include <linux/rbtree_types.h> tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 30/72] locking/spinlock: Provide RT specific spinlock type Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] locking/spinlock: Provide RT specific spinlock_t tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 31/72] locking/spinlock: Provide RT variant header Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] locking/spinlock: Provide RT variant header: <linux/spinlock_rt.h> tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 32/72] locking/rtmutex: Provide the spin/rwlock core lock function Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-27 17:21   ` [patch V5 32/72] " Boqun Feng
2021-08-27 20:03     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 33/72] locking/spinlock: Provide RT variant Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 34/72] locking/rwlock: " Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-11  2:59   ` [patch V5 34/72] " Xiaoming Ni
2021-09-13  6:28     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 35/72] locking/rtmutex: Squash !RT tasks to DEFAULT_PRIO Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 36/72] locking/mutex: Consolidate core headers Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] locking/mutex: Consolidate core headers, remove kernel/locking/mutex-debug.h tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 37/72] locking/mutex: Move waiter to core header Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] locking/mutex: Move the 'struct mutex_waiter' definition from <linux/mutex.h> to the internal header tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 38/72] locking/ww_mutex: Move ww_mutex declarations into ww_mutex.h Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] locking/ww_mutex: Move the ww_mutex definitions from <linux/mutex.h> into <linux/ww_mutex.h> tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 39/72] locking/mutex: Make mutex::wait_lock raw Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 40/72] locking/ww_mutex: Simplify lockdep annotation Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] locking/ww_mutex: Simplify lockdep annotations tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 41/72] locking/ww_mutex: Gather mutex_waiter initialization Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-19 16:54   ` [patch V5 41/72] " Guenter Roeck
2021-08-19 18:08     ` [PATCH] locking/ww_mutex: Initialize waiter.ww_ctx properly Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-19 18:22       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-19 18:32         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-19 17:51   ` [patch V5 41/72] locking/ww_mutex: Gather mutex_waiter initialization Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-19 18:17     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-19 18:28       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-19 19:30       ` [PATCH v2] locking/ww_mutex: Initialize waiter.ww_ctx properly Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-20 10:20         ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 42/72] locking/ww_mutex: Split up ww_mutex_unlock() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 43/72] locking/ww_mutex: Split W/W implementation logic Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] locking/ww_mutex: Split out the W/W implementation logic into kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 44/72] locking/ww_mutex: Remove __sched annotation Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] locking/ww_mutex: Remove the __sched annotation from ww_mutex APIs tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 45/72] locking/ww_mutex: Abstract waiter iteration Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] locking/ww_mutex: Abstract out the " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 46/72] locking/ww_mutex: Abstract waiter enqueueing Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] locking/ww_mutex: Abstract out " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 47/72] locking/ww_mutex: Abstract mutex accessors Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] locking/ww_mutex: Abstract out " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 48/72] locking/ww_mutex: Abstract mutex types Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] locking/ww_mutex: Abstract out " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 49/72] locking/ww_mutex: Abstract internal lock access Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] locking/ww_mutex: Abstract out internal lock accesses tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 50/72] locking/ww_mutex: Implement rt_mutex accessors Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 51/72] locking/ww_mutex: Add RT priority to W/W order Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 52/72] locking/ww_mutex: Add rt_mutex based lock type and accessors Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-15 21:28 ` [patch V5 53/72] locking/rtmutex: Extend the rtmutex core to support ww_mutex Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-15 21:29 ` [patch V5 54/72] locking/ww_mutex: Implement rtmutex based ww_mutex API functions Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-15 21:29 ` [patch V5 55/72] locking/rtmutex: Add mutex variant for RT Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:29 ` [patch V5 56/72] lib/test_lockup: Adapt to changed variables Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-08-15 21:29 ` [patch V5 57/72] futex: Validate waiter correctly in futex_proxy_trylock_atomic() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:29 ` [patch V5 58/72] futex: Cleanup stale comments Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] futex: Clean up " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:29 ` [patch V5 59/72] futex: Clarify futex_requeue() PI handling Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:29 ` [patch V5 60/72] futex: Remove bogus condition for requeue PI Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:29 ` [patch V5 61/72] futex: Correct the number of requeued waiters for PI Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:29 ` [patch V5 62/72] futex: Restructure futex_requeue() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:29 ` [patch V5 63/72] futex: Clarify comment in futex_requeue() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:29 ` [patch V5 64/72] futex: Reorder sanity checks " Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:29 ` [patch V5 65/72] futex: Simplify handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup() Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:14   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:29 ` [patch V5 66/72] futex: Prevent requeue_pi() lock nesting issue on RT Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:13   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:29 ` [patch V5 67/72] rtmutex: Prevent lockdep false positive with PI futexes Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:13   ` [tip: locking/core] locking/rtmutex: " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:29 ` [patch V5 68/72] preempt: Adjust PREEMPT_LOCK_OFFSET for RT Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:13   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:29 ` [patch V5 69/72] locking/rtmutex: Implement equal priority lock stealing Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:13   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Gregory Haskins
2021-08-15 21:29 ` [patch V5 70/72] locking/rtmutex: Add adaptive spinwait mechanism Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:13   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Steven Rostedt
2021-08-15 21:29 ` [patch V5 71/72] locking/spinlock/rt: Prepare for RT local_lock Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:13   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-15 21:29 ` [patch V5 72/72] locking/local_lock: Add PREEMPT_RT support Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-17 20:13   ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-16  9:21 ` [patch V5 00/72] locking, sched: The PREEMPT-RT locking infrastructure Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210815211302.726560996@linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.