From: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.net>
To: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@libero.it>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VFS/BTRFS/NFSD: provide more unique inode number for btrfs export
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:35:05 +0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210816003505.7b3e9861@natsu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf49ef31-0c86-62c8-7862-719935764036@libero.it>
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 09:39:08 +0200
Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@libero.it> wrote:
> I am sure that it was discussed already but I was unable to find any track
> of this discussion. But if the problem is the collision between the inode
> number of different subvolume in the nfd export, is it simpler if the export
> is truncated to the subvolume boundary ? It would be more coherent with the
> current behavior of vfs+nfsd.
See this bugreport thread which started it all:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg111172.html
In there the reporting user replied that it is strongly not feasible for them
to export each individual snapshot.
> In fact in btrfs a subvolume is a complete filesystem, with an "own
> synthetic" device. We could like or not this solution, but this solution is
> the more aligned to the unix standard, where for each filesystem there is a
> pair (device, inode-set). NFS (by default) avoids to cross the boundary
> between the filesystems. So why in BTRFS this should be different ?
From the user point of view subvolumes are basically directories; that they
are "complete filesystems"* is merely a low-level implementation detail.
* well except they are not, as you cannot 'dd' a subvolume to another
blockdevice.
> Why don't rename "ino_uniquifier" as "ino_and_subvolume" and leave to the
> filesystem the work to combine the inode and the subvolume-id ?
>
> I am worried that the logic is split between the filesystem, which
> synthesizes the ino_uniquifier, and to NFS which combine to the inode. I am
> thinking that this combination is filesystem specific; for BTRFS is a simple
> xor but for other filesystem may be a more complex operation, so leaving an
> half in the filesystem and another half to the NFS seems to not optimal if
> other filesystem needs to use ino_uniquifier.
I wondered a bit myself, what are the downsides of just doing the
uniquefication inside Btrfs, not leaving that to NFSD?
I mean not even adding the extra stat field, just return the inode itself with
that already applied. Surely cannot be any worse collision-wise, than
different subvolumes straight up having the same inode numbers as right now?
Or is it a performance concern, always doing more work, for something which
only NFSD has needed so far.
--
With respect,
Roman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-15 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 127+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-27 22:37 [PATCH/RFC 00/11] expose btrfs subvols in mount table correctly NeilBrown
2021-07-27 22:37 ` [PATCH 07/11] exportfs: Allow filehandle lookup to cross internal mount points NeilBrown
2021-07-28 10:13 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-07-29 0:28 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-29 5:27 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-06 7:52 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-08-06 8:08 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-06 8:18 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-07-28 19:17 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-07-28 22:25 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-27 22:37 ` [PATCH 04/11] VFS: export lookup_mnt() NeilBrown
2021-07-30 0:31 ` Al Viro
2021-07-30 5:33 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-27 22:37 ` [PATCH 01/11] VFS: show correct dev num in mountinfo NeilBrown
2021-07-30 0:25 ` Al Viro
2021-07-30 5:28 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-30 5:54 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-07-30 6:13 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-30 7:18 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-07-30 7:33 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-30 7:59 ` Miklos Szeredi
2021-08-02 4:18 ` A Third perspective on BTRFS nfsd subvol dev/inode number issues NeilBrown
2021-08-02 5:25 ` Al Viro
2021-08-02 5:40 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-02 7:54 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-02 13:53 ` Josef Bacik
2021-08-03 22:29 ` Qu Wenruo
2021-08-02 14:47 ` Frank Filz
2021-08-02 21:24 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-02 7:15 ` Martin Steigerwald
2021-08-02 21:40 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-02 12:39 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-08-02 20:32 ` Patrick Goetz
2021-08-02 20:41 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-08-02 21:10 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-02 21:50 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-08-02 21:59 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-02 22:14 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-08-02 22:36 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-03 0:15 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-07-27 22:37 ` [PATCH 03/11] VFS: pass lookup_flags into follow_down() NeilBrown
2021-07-27 22:37 ` [PATCH 11/11] btrfs: use automount to bind-mount all subvol roots NeilBrown
2021-07-28 8:37 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-28 8:37 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-28 8:37 ` [RFC PATCH] btrfs: btrfs_mountpoint_expiry_timeout can be static kernel test robot
2021-07-28 8:37 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-28 13:12 ` [PATCH 11/11] btrfs: use automount to bind-mount all subvol roots Christian Brauner
2021-07-29 0:43 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-29 14:38 ` Christian Brauner
2021-07-31 6:25 ` [btrfs] 5874902268: xfstests.btrfs.202.fail kernel test robot
2021-07-31 6:25 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-27 22:37 ` [PATCH 06/11] nfsd: include a vfsmount in struct svc_fh NeilBrown
2021-07-27 22:37 ` [PATCH 10/11] btrfs: introduce mapping function from location to inum NeilBrown
2021-07-27 22:37 ` [PATCH 02/11] VFS: allow d_automount to create in-place bind-mount NeilBrown
2021-07-27 22:37 ` [PATCH 09/11] nfsd: Allow filehandle lookup to cross internal mount points NeilBrown
2021-07-28 19:15 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-07-28 22:29 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-30 0:42 ` Al Viro
2021-07-30 5:43 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-27 22:37 ` [PATCH 08/11] nfsd: change get_parent_attributes() to nfsd_get_mounted_on() NeilBrown
2021-07-27 22:37 ` [PATCH 05/11] VFS: new function: mount_is_internal() NeilBrown
2021-07-28 2:16 ` Al Viro
2021-07-28 3:32 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-30 0:34 ` Al Viro
2021-07-28 2:19 ` [PATCH/RFC 00/11] expose btrfs subvols in mount table correctly Al Viro
2021-07-28 4:58 ` Wang Yugui
2021-07-28 6:04 ` Wang Yugui
2021-07-28 7:01 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-28 12:26 ` Neal Gompa
2021-07-28 19:14 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-07-29 1:29 ` Zygo Blaxell
2021-07-29 1:43 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-29 23:20 ` Zygo Blaxell
2021-07-28 22:50 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-29 2:37 ` Zygo Blaxell
2021-07-29 3:36 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-29 23:20 ` Zygo Blaxell
2021-07-30 2:36 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-30 5:25 ` Qu Wenruo
2021-07-30 5:31 ` Qu Wenruo
2021-07-30 5:53 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-07-30 6:00 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-30 6:09 ` Qu Wenruo
2021-07-30 5:58 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-30 6:23 ` Qu Wenruo
2021-07-30 6:53 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-30 7:09 ` Qu Wenruo
2021-07-30 18:15 ` Zygo Blaxell
2021-07-30 15:17 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-07-30 15:48 ` Josef Bacik
2021-07-30 16:25 ` Forza
2021-07-30 17:43 ` Zygo Blaxell
2021-07-30 5:28 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-07-28 13:43 ` g.btrfs
2021-07-29 1:39 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-29 9:28 ` Graham Cobb
2021-07-28 7:06 ` NeilBrown
2021-07-28 9:36 ` Wang Yugui
2021-07-28 19:35 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-07-28 21:30 ` Josef Bacik
2021-07-30 0:13 ` Al Viro
2021-07-30 6:08 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-13 1:45 ` [PATCH] VFS/BTRFS/NFSD: provide more unique inode number for btrfs export NeilBrown
2021-08-13 14:55 ` Josef Bacik
2021-08-15 7:39 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2021-08-15 19:35 ` Roman Mamedov [this message]
2021-08-15 21:03 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2021-08-15 21:53 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-17 19:34 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2021-08-17 21:39 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-18 17:24 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2021-08-15 22:17 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-19 8:01 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-20 3:21 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-20 6:23 ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-23 4:05 ` [PATCH v2] BTRFS/NFSD: " NeilBrown
2021-08-23 8:17 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-23 8:17 ` kernel test robot
2021-08-18 14:54 ` [PATCH] VFS/BTRFS/NFSD: " Wang Yugui
2021-08-18 21:46 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-19 2:19 ` Zygo Blaxell
2021-08-20 2:54 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-22 19:29 ` Zygo Blaxell
2021-08-23 5:51 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-23 23:22 ` NeilBrown
2021-08-25 2:06 ` Zygo Blaxell
2021-08-23 0:57 ` Wang Yugui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210816003505.7b3e9861@natsu \
--to=rm@romanrm.net \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kreijack@libero.it \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.