From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E83C4338F for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 06:58:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 490DD61A81 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 06:58:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233349AbhHPG7Z (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2021 02:59:25 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:53184 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233571AbhHPG7Z (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2021 02:59:25 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id F308C68AFE; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 08:58:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 08:58:51 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Michael Schmitz Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andreas Schwab , Geert Uytterhoeven , Greg Ungerer , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: RFC: remove set_fs for m68k Message-ID: <20210816065851.GA26665@lst.de> References: <65a95ae0-4734-68ce-ef71-7491b5534718@gmail.com> <8f470389-fe8a-90b0-19a5-68f85526b30e@gmail.com> <20210721170529.GA14550@lst.de> <20210723051126.GA31274@lst.de> <8884e940-22e8-72a5-e9ec-f9b2628b6ef4@gmail.com> <251aa093-047a-b37c-4e88-d543c6fa8bc6@gmail.com> <20210815074236.GA23777@lst.de> <63c35a20-3eec-1825-fa18-5df28f5b6eaa@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <63c35a20-3eec-1825-fa18-5df28f5b6eaa@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 07:17:15AM +1200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > Would it be acceptable to add this on top of the probe040/do_040writeback1 > patch that I'm currently testing? Sure.