From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD01C4338F for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 17:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B439460F41 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 17:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231514AbhHPRfg (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2021 13:35:36 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:55563 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229958AbhHPRff (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2021 13:35:35 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 853F568AFE; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 19:34:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 19:34:58 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Zhenyu Wang Cc: Jason Gunthorpe , Christoph Hellwig , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , Greg KH , "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" , Joonas Lahtinen , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jani Nikula , Gerd Hoffmann , "Vivi, Rodrigo" , "intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" , "Wang, Zhi A" Subject: Re: refactor the i915 GVT support Message-ID: <20210816173458.GA9183@lst.de> References: <20210721155355.173183-1-hch@lst.de> <20210722112636.wj277vqhg4dez5ug@sirius.home.kraxel.org> <20210727121224.GA2145868@nvidia.com> <20210728175925.GU1721383@nvidia.com> <20210729072022.GB31896@lst.de> <20210803094315.GF13928@zhen-hp.sh.intel.com> <20210803143058.GA1721383@nvidia.com> <20210804052606.GG13928@zhen-hp.sh.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210804052606.GG13928@zhen-hp.sh.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 01:26:06PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > On 2021.08.03 11:30:58 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 05:43:15PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > > Acked-by: Zhenyu Wang > > > > > > Thanks a lot for this effort! > > > > Great, do we have a submission plan for this? how much does it clash > > with my open_device/etc patch? ie does the whole thing have to go > > through the vfio tree? > > > > I think Alex would determine when to merge open_device series, gvt part > can be through vfio tree without problem. For this refactor, I would first > merge for gvt staging to do more regression testing before sending through > i915 tree. Any updates on this? I'd really hate to miss this merge window. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA11CC432BE for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 17:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F7F360240 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 17:35:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 5F7F360240 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C570789DDD; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 17:35:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57C3989DDD; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 17:35:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 853F568AFE; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 19:34:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 19:34:58 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Zhenyu Wang Cc: Jason Gunthorpe , Christoph Hellwig , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , Greg KH , "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" , Joonas Lahtinen , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jani Nikula , Gerd Hoffmann , "Vivi, Rodrigo" , "intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" , "Wang, Zhi A" Message-ID: <20210816173458.GA9183@lst.de> References: <20210721155355.173183-1-hch@lst.de> <20210722112636.wj277vqhg4dez5ug@sirius.home.kraxel.org> <20210727121224.GA2145868@nvidia.com> <20210728175925.GU1721383@nvidia.com> <20210729072022.GB31896@lst.de> <20210803094315.GF13928@zhen-hp.sh.intel.com> <20210803143058.GA1721383@nvidia.com> <20210804052606.GG13928@zhen-hp.sh.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210804052606.GG13928@zhen-hp.sh.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] refactor the i915 GVT support X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 01:26:06PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > On 2021.08.03 11:30:58 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 05:43:15PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > > Acked-by: Zhenyu Wang > > > > > > Thanks a lot for this effort! > > > > Great, do we have a submission plan for this? how much does it clash > > with my open_device/etc patch? ie does the whole thing have to go > > through the vfio tree? > > > > I think Alex would determine when to merge open_device series, gvt part > can be through vfio tree without problem. For this refactor, I would first > merge for gvt staging to do more regression testing before sending through > i915 tree. Any updates on this? I'd really hate to miss this merge window.