From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BB5C4320E for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 01:32:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 191A760241 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 01:32:10 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 191A760241 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1086E0E7; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 01:31:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 289CE6E0DF; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 01:31:33 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10078"; a="238049580" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,327,1620716400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="238049580" Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Aug 2021 18:31:32 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,327,1620716400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="510166288" Received: from zhen-hp.sh.intel.com (HELO zhen-hp) ([10.239.160.143]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Aug 2021 18:31:29 -0700 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:08:51 +0800 From: Zhenyu Wang To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jason Gunthorpe , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , Greg KH , "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" , Joonas Lahtinen , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jani Nikula , Gerd Hoffmann , "Vivi, Rodrigo" , "intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" , "Wang, Zhi A" , Jani Nikula Subject: Re: refactor the i915 GVT support Message-ID: <20210817010851.GW13928@zhen-hp.sh.intel.com> References: <20210722112636.wj277vqhg4dez5ug@sirius.home.kraxel.org> <20210727121224.GA2145868@nvidia.com> <20210728175925.GU1721383@nvidia.com> <20210729072022.GB31896@lst.de> <20210803094315.GF13928@zhen-hp.sh.intel.com> <20210803143058.GA1721383@nvidia.com> <20210804052606.GG13928@zhen-hp.sh.intel.com> <20210816173458.GA9183@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VouvK5X/VR+fp5FT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210816173458.GA9183@lst.de> X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Zhenyu Wang Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" --VouvK5X/VR+fp5FT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2021.08.16 19:34:58 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 01:26:06PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > On 2021.08.03 11:30:58 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 05:43:15PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > > > Acked-by: Zhenyu Wang > > > >=20 > > > > Thanks a lot for this effort! > > >=20 > > > Great, do we have a submission plan for this? how much does it clash > > > with my open_device/etc patch? ie does the whole thing have to go > > > through the vfio tree? > > >=20 > >=20 > > I think Alex would determine when to merge open_device series, gvt part > > can be through vfio tree without problem. For this refactor, I would fi= rst > > merge for gvt staging to do more regression testing before sending thro= ugh > > i915 tree. >=20 > Any updates on this? I'd really hate to miss this merge window. I'm still waiting for our validation team's report on this. I'm afraid it might be missing for next version as i915 merge window is mostly till rc5...and for any change outside of gvt, it still needs to be acked by i915 maintainers. --VouvK5X/VR+fp5FT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQTXuabgHDW6LPt9CICxBBozTXgYJwUCYRsMHgAKCRCxBBozTXgY J/uZAJ9O1Xv+jB7s4e9+XWerKNMKnBieGACZAXpb2Wyjk+BSDBYt8ZZFoPvmEAw= =wtSd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VouvK5X/VR+fp5FT-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4A8C4338F for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 01:32:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79E760E09 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 01:32:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237619AbhHQBdV (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2021 21:33:21 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:59622 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239201AbhHQBcF (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Aug 2021 21:32:05 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10078"; a="215973842" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,327,1620716400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="215973842" Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Aug 2021 18:31:32 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,327,1620716400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="510166288" Received: from zhen-hp.sh.intel.com (HELO zhen-hp) ([10.239.160.143]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Aug 2021 18:31:29 -0700 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:08:51 +0800 From: Zhenyu Wang To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jason Gunthorpe , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , Greg KH , "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" , Joonas Lahtinen , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jani Nikula , Gerd Hoffmann , "Vivi, Rodrigo" , "intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" , "Wang, Zhi A" , Jani Nikula Subject: Re: refactor the i915 GVT support Message-ID: <20210817010851.GW13928@zhen-hp.sh.intel.com> Reply-To: Zhenyu Wang References: <20210722112636.wj277vqhg4dez5ug@sirius.home.kraxel.org> <20210727121224.GA2145868@nvidia.com> <20210728175925.GU1721383@nvidia.com> <20210729072022.GB31896@lst.de> <20210803094315.GF13928@zhen-hp.sh.intel.com> <20210803143058.GA1721383@nvidia.com> <20210804052606.GG13928@zhen-hp.sh.intel.com> <20210816173458.GA9183@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VouvK5X/VR+fp5FT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210816173458.GA9183@lst.de> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --VouvK5X/VR+fp5FT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2021.08.16 19:34:58 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 01:26:06PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > On 2021.08.03 11:30:58 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 05:43:15PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > > > Acked-by: Zhenyu Wang > > > >=20 > > > > Thanks a lot for this effort! > > >=20 > > > Great, do we have a submission plan for this? how much does it clash > > > with my open_device/etc patch? ie does the whole thing have to go > > > through the vfio tree? > > >=20 > >=20 > > I think Alex would determine when to merge open_device series, gvt part > > can be through vfio tree without problem. For this refactor, I would fi= rst > > merge for gvt staging to do more regression testing before sending thro= ugh > > i915 tree. >=20 > Any updates on this? I'd really hate to miss this merge window. I'm still waiting for our validation team's report on this. I'm afraid it might be missing for next version as i915 merge window is mostly till rc5...and for any change outside of gvt, it still needs to be acked by i915 maintainers. --VouvK5X/VR+fp5FT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQTXuabgHDW6LPt9CICxBBozTXgYJwUCYRsMHgAKCRCxBBozTXgY J/uZAJ9O1Xv+jB7s4e9+XWerKNMKnBieGACZAXpb2Wyjk+BSDBYt8ZZFoPvmEAw= =wtSd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VouvK5X/VR+fp5FT-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C59FC432BE for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 01:32:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C17B60241 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 01:32:07 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 4C17B60241 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C63BC6E0DF; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 01:31:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 289CE6E0DF; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 01:31:33 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10078"; a="238049580" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,327,1620716400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="238049580" Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Aug 2021 18:31:32 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,327,1620716400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="510166288" Received: from zhen-hp.sh.intel.com (HELO zhen-hp) ([10.239.160.143]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Aug 2021 18:31:29 -0700 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 09:08:51 +0800 From: Zhenyu Wang To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jason Gunthorpe , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , Greg KH , "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" , Joonas Lahtinen , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jani Nikula , Gerd Hoffmann , "Vivi, Rodrigo" , "intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" , "Wang, Zhi A" , Jani Nikula Message-ID: <20210817010851.GW13928@zhen-hp.sh.intel.com> References: <20210722112636.wj277vqhg4dez5ug@sirius.home.kraxel.org> <20210727121224.GA2145868@nvidia.com> <20210728175925.GU1721383@nvidia.com> <20210729072022.GB31896@lst.de> <20210803094315.GF13928@zhen-hp.sh.intel.com> <20210803143058.GA1721383@nvidia.com> <20210804052606.GG13928@zhen-hp.sh.intel.com> <20210816173458.GA9183@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VouvK5X/VR+fp5FT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210816173458.GA9183@lst.de> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] refactor the i915 GVT support X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Zhenyu Wang Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" --VouvK5X/VR+fp5FT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2021.08.16 19:34:58 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 01:26:06PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > On 2021.08.03 11:30:58 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 05:43:15PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > > > Acked-by: Zhenyu Wang > > > >=20 > > > > Thanks a lot for this effort! > > >=20 > > > Great, do we have a submission plan for this? how much does it clash > > > with my open_device/etc patch? ie does the whole thing have to go > > > through the vfio tree? > > >=20 > >=20 > > I think Alex would determine when to merge open_device series, gvt part > > can be through vfio tree without problem. For this refactor, I would fi= rst > > merge for gvt staging to do more regression testing before sending thro= ugh > > i915 tree. >=20 > Any updates on this? I'd really hate to miss this merge window. I'm still waiting for our validation team's report on this. I'm afraid it might be missing for next version as i915 merge window is mostly till rc5...and for any change outside of gvt, it still needs to be acked by i915 maintainers. --VouvK5X/VR+fp5FT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQTXuabgHDW6LPt9CICxBBozTXgYJwUCYRsMHgAKCRCxBBozTXgY J/uZAJ9O1Xv+jB7s4e9+XWerKNMKnBieGACZAXpb2Wyjk+BSDBYt8ZZFoPvmEAw= =wtSd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VouvK5X/VR+fp5FT--