From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22810C4338F for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 03:13:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE232610E5 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 03:13:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org CE232610E5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:37938 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mGYUL-0000mh-0o for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 23:13:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56638) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mGYSE-0006Er-2p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 23:10:54 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.187]:2517) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mGYS7-0003Ua-6f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 23:10:53 -0400 Received: from dggemv704-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.57]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4GqqWr6YFKzYhf5; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 11:10:16 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500023.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.83) by dggemv704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 11:10:42 +0800 Received: from DESKTOP-TMVL5KK.china.huawei.com (10.174.187.128) by dggpemm500023.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.83) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 11:10:41 +0800 From: Yanan Wang To: Subject: [PATCH v6 06/16] machine: Improve the error reporting of smp parsing Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 11:10:17 +0800 Message-ID: <20210819031027.41104-7-wangyanan55@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.8.4.windows.1 In-Reply-To: <20210819031027.41104-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com> References: <20210819031027.41104-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.174.187.128] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To dggpemm500023.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.83) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.187; envelope-from=wangyanan55@huawei.com; helo=szxga01-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Andrew Jones , Cornelia Huck , =?UTF-8?q?Daniel=20P=20=2E=20Berrang=C3=A9?= , Eduardo Habkost , Pierre Morel , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Pankaj Gupta , Richard Henderson , Greg Kurz , Halil Pasic , wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com, Thomas Huth , Paolo Bonzini , Yanan Wang , David Gibson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" We have two requirements for a valid SMP configuration: the product of "sockets * cores * threads" must represent all the possible cpus, i.e., max_cpus, and then must include the initially present cpus, i.e., smp_cpus. So we only need to ensure 1) "sockets * cores * threads == maxcpus" at first and then ensure 2) "maxcpus >= cpus". With a reasonable order of the sanity check, we can simplify the error reporting code. When reporting an error message we also report the exact value of each topology member to make users easily see what's going on. Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones Reviewed-by: Pankaj Gupta --- hw/core/machine.c | 22 +++++++++------------- hw/i386/pc.c | 24 ++++++++++-------------- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c index 85908abc77..093c0d382d 100644 --- a/hw/core/machine.c +++ b/hw/core/machine.c @@ -779,25 +779,21 @@ static void smp_parse(MachineState *ms, SMPConfiguration *config, Error **errp) maxcpus = maxcpus > 0 ? maxcpus : sockets * cores * threads; cpus = cpus > 0 ? cpus : maxcpus; - if (sockets * cores * threads < cpus) { - error_setg(errp, "cpu topology: " - "sockets (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) < " - "smp_cpus (%u)", - sockets, cores, threads, cpus); + if (sockets * cores * threads != maxcpus) { + error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU topology: " + "product of the hierarchy must match maxcpus: " + "sockets (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) " + "!= maxcpus (%u)", + sockets, cores, threads, maxcpus); return; } if (maxcpus < cpus) { - error_setg(errp, "maxcpus must be equal to or greater than smp"); - return; - } - - if (sockets * cores * threads != maxcpus) { error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU topology: " + "maxcpus must be equal to or greater than smp: " "sockets (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) " - "!= maxcpus (%u)", - sockets, cores, threads, - maxcpus); + "== maxcpus (%u) < smp_cpus (%u)", + sockets, cores, threads, maxcpus, cpus); return; } diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c index 9ad7ae5254..fcf6905219 100644 --- a/hw/i386/pc.c +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c @@ -747,25 +747,21 @@ static void pc_smp_parse(MachineState *ms, SMPConfiguration *config, Error **err maxcpus = maxcpus > 0 ? maxcpus : sockets * dies * cores * threads; cpus = cpus > 0 ? cpus : maxcpus; - if (sockets * dies * cores * threads < cpus) { - error_setg(errp, "cpu topology: " - "sockets (%u) * dies (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) < " - "smp_cpus (%u)", - sockets, dies, cores, threads, cpus); + if (sockets * dies * cores * threads != maxcpus) { + error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU topology: " + "product of the hierarchy must match maxcpus: " + "sockets (%u) * dies (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) " + "!= maxcpus (%u)", + sockets, dies, cores, threads, maxcpus); return; } if (maxcpus < cpus) { - error_setg(errp, "maxcpus must be equal to or greater than smp"); - return; - } - - if (sockets * dies * cores * threads != maxcpus) { - error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU topology deprecated: " + error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU topology: " + "maxcpus must be equal to or greater than smp: " "sockets (%u) * dies (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) " - "!= maxcpus (%u)", - sockets, dies, cores, threads, - maxcpus); + "== maxcpus (%u) < smp_cpus (%u)", + sockets, dies, cores, threads, maxcpus, cpus); return; } -- 2.19.1