[PATCH v1 5/6] kselftest/arm64: signal: Add test case for SVE register state in signals

[Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>]

Currently this doesn't actually verify that the register contents do the
right thing, it just verifes that a SVE context with appropriate size
appears.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 .../arm64/signal/testcases/sve_regs.c         | 126 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 126 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/sve_regs.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/sve_regs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/sve_regs.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4b2418aa08a9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/sve_regs.c
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2021 ARM Limited
+ *
+ * Verify that the SVE register context in signal frames is set up as
+ * expected.
+ */
+
+#include <signal.h>
+#include <ucontext.h>
+#include <sys/prctl.h>
+
+#include "test_signals_utils.h"
+#include "testcases.h"
+
+struct fake_sigframe sf;
+static unsigned int vls[SVE_VQ_MAX];
+unsigned int nvls = 0;
+
+static bool sve_get_vls(struct tdescr *td)
+{
+	int vq, vl;
+
+	/*
+	 * Enumerate up to SVE_VQ_MAX vector lengths
+	 */
+	for (vq = SVE_VQ_MAX; vq > 0; --vq) {
+		vl = prctl(PR_SVE_SET_VL, vq * 16);
+		if (vl == -1)
+			return false;
+
+		vl &= PR_SVE_VL_LEN_MASK;
+
+		/* Skip missing VLs */
+		vq = sve_vq_from_vl(vl);
+
+		vls[nvls++] = vl;
+	}
+
+	/* We need at least one VL */
+	if (nvls < 1) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "Only %d VL supported\n", nvls);
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+static void setup_sve_regs(void)
+{
+	/* RDVL x16, #1 so we should have SVE regs; real data is TODO */
+	asm volatile(".inst 0x04bf5030" : : : "x16" );
+}
+
+static int do_one_sve_vl(struct tdescr *td, siginfo_t *si, ucontext_t *uc,
+			 unsigned int vl)
+{
+	size_t resv_sz, offset;
+	struct _aarch64_ctx *head = GET_SF_RESV_HEAD(sf);
+	struct sve_context *sve;
+
+	fprintf(stderr, "Testing VL %d\n", vl);
+
+	if (prctl(PR_SVE_SET_VL, vl) == -1) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "Failed to set VL\n");
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Get a signal context which should have a SVE frame and registers
+	 * in it.
+	 */
+	setup_sve_regs();
+	if (!get_current_context(td, &sf.uc))
+		return 1;
+
+	resv_sz = GET_SF_RESV_SIZE(sf);
+	head = get_header(head, SVE_MAGIC, resv_sz, &offset);
+	if (!head) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "No SVE context\n");
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	sve = (struct sve_context *)head;
+	if (sve->vl != vl) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "Got VL %d, expected %d\n", sve->vl, vl);
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	/* The actual size validation is done in get_current_context() */
+	fprintf(stderr, "Got expected size %u and VL %d\n",
+		head->size, sve->vl);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int sve_regs(struct tdescr *td, siginfo_t *si, ucontext_t *uc)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nvls; i++) {
+		/*
+		 * TODO: the signal test helpers can't currently cope
+		 * with signal frames bigger than struct sigcontext,
+		 * skip VLs that will trigger that.
+		 */
+		if (vls[i] > 64)
+			continue;
+
+		if (do_one_sve_vl(td, si, uc, vls[i]))
+			return 1;
+	}
+
+	td->pass = 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+struct tdescr tde = {
+	.name = "SVE registers",
+	.descr = "Check that we get the right SVE registers reported",
+	.feats_required = FEAT_SVE,
+	.timeout = 3,
+	.init = sve_get_vls,
+	.run = sve_regs,
+};
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel