All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* cleanup vfio iommu_group creation v2
@ 2021-08-24 14:46 Christoph Hellwig
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 01/14] vfio: Move vfio_iommu_group_get() to vfio_register_group_dev() Christoph Hellwig
                   ` (13 more replies)
  0 siblings, 14 replies; 50+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-08-24 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger,
	Jason Gunthorpe, kvm

Hi Alex,

this series cleans up how iommu group are created in VFIO as well as
various other lose ends around that.  It sits on top of the

    "Provide core infrastructure for managing open/release"

series from Jason.

Changes since v1:
 - only taint if a noiommu group was successfully created

Diffstat:
 drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c            |   17 -
 drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_driver.c              |   46 ----
 drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c                |    2 
 drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c                  |   15 -
 drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c |   13 -
 drivers/vfio/vfio.c                          |  305 +++++++++++----------------
 drivers/vfio/vfio.h                          |   52 ++++
 drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c          |    6 
 drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c              |  259 ++++++----------------
 include/linux/mdev.h                         |   20 -
 include/linux/vfio.h                         |   53 ----
 samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c                   |    2 
 samples/vfio-mdev/mdpy.c                     |    2 
 samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c                     |    2 
 14 files changed, 281 insertions(+), 513 deletions(-)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 01/14] vfio: Move vfio_iommu_group_get() to vfio_register_group_dev()
  2021-08-24 14:46 cleanup vfio iommu_group creation v2 Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-24 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
  2021-08-24 20:25   ` Alex Williamson
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 02/14] vfio: factor out a vfio_iommu_driver_allowed helper Christoph Hellwig
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-08-24 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger,
	Jason Gunthorpe, kvm, Jason Gunthorpe

From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

We don't need to hold a reference to the group in the driver as well as
obtain a reference to the same group as the first thing
vfio_register_group_dev() does.

Since the drivers never use the group move this all into the core code.

Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c            | 17 ++-----------
 drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c                  | 15 ++----------
 drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c | 13 +---------
 drivers/vfio/vfio.c                          | 25 ++++++--------------
 include/linux/vfio.h                         |  3 ---
 5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c
index 0ead91bfa83867..9e838fed560339 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c
@@ -505,22 +505,13 @@ static void vfio_fsl_uninit_device(struct vfio_fsl_mc_device *vdev)
 
 static int vfio_fsl_mc_probe(struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev)
 {
-	struct iommu_group *group;
 	struct vfio_fsl_mc_device *vdev;
 	struct device *dev = &mc_dev->dev;
 	int ret;
 
-	group = vfio_iommu_group_get(dev);
-	if (!group) {
-		dev_err(dev, "VFIO_FSL_MC: No IOMMU group\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	vdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*vdev), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!vdev) {
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto out_group_put;
-	}
+	if (!vdev)
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	vfio_init_group_dev(&vdev->vdev, dev, &vfio_fsl_mc_ops);
 	vdev->mc_dev = mc_dev;
@@ -556,8 +547,6 @@ static int vfio_fsl_mc_probe(struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev)
 out_uninit:
 	vfio_uninit_group_dev(&vdev->vdev);
 	kfree(vdev);
-out_group_put:
-	vfio_iommu_group_put(group, dev);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -574,8 +563,6 @@ static int vfio_fsl_mc_remove(struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev)
 
 	vfio_uninit_group_dev(&vdev->vdev);
 	kfree(vdev);
-	vfio_iommu_group_put(mc_dev->dev.iommu_group, dev);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
index a4f44ea52fa324..b01c1c6cf1f5e6 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
@@ -1875,7 +1875,6 @@ static void vfio_pci_vga_uninit(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev)
 static int vfio_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
 {
 	struct vfio_pci_device *vdev;
-	struct iommu_group *group;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (vfio_pci_is_denylisted(pdev))
@@ -1897,15 +1896,9 @@ static int vfio_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
 		return -EBUSY;
 	}
 
-	group = vfio_iommu_group_get(&pdev->dev);
-	if (!group)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	vdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*vdev), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!vdev) {
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto out_group_put;
-	}
+	if (!vdev)
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	vfio_init_group_dev(&vdev->vdev, &pdev->dev, &vfio_pci_ops);
 	vdev->pdev = pdev;
@@ -1971,8 +1964,6 @@ static int vfio_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
 	vfio_uninit_group_dev(&vdev->vdev);
 	kfree(vdev->pm_save);
 	kfree(vdev);
-out_group_put:
-	vfio_iommu_group_put(group, &pdev->dev);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -1988,8 +1979,6 @@ static void vfio_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 	vfio_uninit_group_dev(&vdev->vdev);
 	vfio_pci_vga_uninit(vdev);
 
-	vfio_iommu_group_put(pdev->dev.iommu_group, &pdev->dev);
-
 	if (!disable_idle_d3)
 		vfio_pci_set_power_state(vdev, PCI_D0);
 
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
index 6af7ce7d619c25..256f55b84e70a0 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
@@ -642,7 +642,6 @@ static int vfio_platform_of_probe(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
 int vfio_platform_probe_common(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
 			       struct device *dev)
 {
-	struct iommu_group *group;
 	int ret;
 
 	vfio_init_group_dev(&vdev->vdev, dev, &vfio_platform_ops);
@@ -663,24 +662,15 @@ int vfio_platform_probe_common(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
 		goto out_uninit;
 	}
 
-	group = vfio_iommu_group_get(dev);
-	if (!group) {
-		dev_err(dev, "No IOMMU group for device %s\n", vdev->name);
-		ret = -EINVAL;
-		goto put_reset;
-	}
-
 	ret = vfio_register_group_dev(&vdev->vdev);
 	if (ret)
-		goto put_iommu;
+		goto put_reset;
 
 	mutex_init(&vdev->igate);
 
 	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
 	return 0;
 
-put_iommu:
-	vfio_iommu_group_put(group, dev);
 put_reset:
 	vfio_platform_put_reset(vdev);
 out_uninit:
@@ -696,7 +686,6 @@ void vfio_platform_remove_common(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
 	pm_runtime_disable(vdev->device);
 	vfio_platform_put_reset(vdev);
 	vfio_uninit_group_dev(&vdev->vdev);
-	vfio_iommu_group_put(vdev->vdev.dev->iommu_group, vdev->vdev.dev);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_platform_remove_common);
 
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
index 3c034fe14ccb03..5bd520f0dc6107 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
@@ -169,15 +169,7 @@ static void vfio_release_device_set(struct vfio_device *device)
 	xa_unlock(&vfio_device_set_xa);
 }
 
-/*
- * vfio_iommu_group_{get,put} are only intended for VFIO bus driver probe
- * and remove functions, any use cases other than acquiring the first
- * reference for the purpose of calling vfio_register_group_dev() or removing
- * that symmetric reference after vfio_unregister_group_dev() should use the raw
- * iommu_group_{get,put} functions.  In particular, vfio_iommu_group_put()
- * removes the device from the dummy group and cannot be nested.
- */
-struct iommu_group *vfio_iommu_group_get(struct device *dev)
+static struct iommu_group *vfio_iommu_group_get(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct iommu_group *group;
 	int __maybe_unused ret;
@@ -220,9 +212,8 @@ struct iommu_group *vfio_iommu_group_get(struct device *dev)
 
 	return group;
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_iommu_group_get);
 
-void vfio_iommu_group_put(struct iommu_group *group, struct device *dev)
+static void vfio_iommu_group_put(struct iommu_group *group, struct device *dev)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU
 	if (iommu_group_get_iommudata(group) == &noiommu)
@@ -231,7 +222,6 @@ void vfio_iommu_group_put(struct iommu_group *group, struct device *dev)
 
 	iommu_group_put(group);
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_iommu_group_put);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU
 static void *vfio_noiommu_open(unsigned long arg)
@@ -841,7 +831,7 @@ int vfio_register_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
 	if (!device->dev_set)
 		vfio_assign_device_set(device, device);
 
-	iommu_group = iommu_group_get(device->dev);
+	iommu_group = vfio_iommu_group_get(device->dev);
 	if (!iommu_group)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
@@ -849,7 +839,7 @@ int vfio_register_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
 	if (!group) {
 		group = vfio_create_group(iommu_group);
 		if (IS_ERR(group)) {
-			iommu_group_put(iommu_group);
+			vfio_iommu_group_put(iommu_group, device->dev);
 			return PTR_ERR(group);
 		}
 	} else {
@@ -857,7 +847,7 @@ int vfio_register_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
 		 * A found vfio_group already holds a reference to the
 		 * iommu_group.  A created vfio_group keeps the reference.
 		 */
-		iommu_group_put(iommu_group);
+		vfio_iommu_group_put(iommu_group, device->dev);
 	}
 
 	existing_device = vfio_group_get_device(group, device->dev);
@@ -865,7 +855,7 @@ int vfio_register_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
 		dev_WARN(device->dev, "Device already exists on group %d\n",
 			 iommu_group_id(iommu_group));
 		vfio_device_put(existing_device);
-		vfio_group_put(group);
+		vfio_iommu_group_put(iommu_group, device->dev);
 		return -EBUSY;
 	}
 
@@ -1010,8 +1000,7 @@ void vfio_unregister_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
 	if (list_empty(&group->device_list))
 		wait_event(group->container_q, !group->container);
 
-	/* Matches the get in vfio_register_group_dev() */
-	vfio_group_put(group);
+	vfio_iommu_group_put(group->iommu_group, device->dev);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_unregister_group_dev);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
index b53a9557884ada..f7083c2fd0d099 100644
--- a/include/linux/vfio.h
+++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
@@ -71,9 +71,6 @@ struct vfio_device_ops {
 	int	(*match)(struct vfio_device *vdev, char *buf);
 };
 
-extern struct iommu_group *vfio_iommu_group_get(struct device *dev);
-extern void vfio_iommu_group_put(struct iommu_group *group, struct device *dev);
-
 void vfio_init_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device, struct device *dev,
 			 const struct vfio_device_ops *ops);
 void vfio_uninit_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device);
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 02/14] vfio: factor out a vfio_iommu_driver_allowed helper
  2021-08-24 14:46 cleanup vfio iommu_group creation v2 Christoph Hellwig
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 01/14] vfio: Move vfio_iommu_group_get() to vfio_register_group_dev() Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-24 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
  2021-08-24 23:24   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 03/14] vfio: remove the iommudata check in vfio_noiommu_attach_group Christoph Hellwig
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-08-24 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger,
	Jason Gunthorpe, kvm

Factor out a little helper to make the checks for the noiommu driver less
ugly.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
index 5bd520f0dc6107..6705349ed93378 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
@@ -267,8 +267,23 @@ static const struct vfio_iommu_driver_ops vfio_noiommu_ops = {
 	.attach_group = vfio_noiommu_attach_group,
 	.detach_group = vfio_noiommu_detach_group,
 };
-#endif
 
+/*
+ * Only noiommu containers can use vfio-noiommu and noiommu containers can only
+ * use vfio-noiommu.
+ */
+static inline bool vfio_iommu_driver_allowed(struct vfio_container *container,
+		const struct vfio_iommu_driver *driver)
+{
+	return container->noiommu == (driver->ops == &vfio_noiommu_ops);
+}
+#else
+static inline bool vfio_iommu_driver_allowed(struct vfio_container *container,
+		const struct vfio_iommu_driver *driver)
+{
+	return true;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU */
 
 /**
  * IOMMU driver registration
@@ -1031,13 +1046,10 @@ static long vfio_ioctl_check_extension(struct vfio_container *container,
 			list_for_each_entry(driver, &vfio.iommu_drivers_list,
 					    vfio_next) {
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU
 				if (!list_empty(&container->group_list) &&
-				    (container->noiommu !=
-				     (driver->ops == &vfio_noiommu_ops)))
+				    !vfio_iommu_driver_allowed(container,
+							       driver))
 					continue;
-#endif
-
 				if (!try_module_get(driver->ops->owner))
 					continue;
 
@@ -1109,15 +1121,8 @@ static long vfio_ioctl_set_iommu(struct vfio_container *container,
 	list_for_each_entry(driver, &vfio.iommu_drivers_list, vfio_next) {
 		void *data;
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU
-		/*
-		 * Only noiommu containers can use vfio-noiommu and noiommu
-		 * containers can only use vfio-noiommu.
-		 */
-		if (container->noiommu != (driver->ops == &vfio_noiommu_ops))
+		if (!vfio_iommu_driver_allowed(container, driver))
 			continue;
-#endif
-
 		if (!try_module_get(driver->ops->owner))
 			continue;
 
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 03/14] vfio: remove the iommudata check in vfio_noiommu_attach_group
  2021-08-24 14:46 cleanup vfio iommu_group creation v2 Christoph Hellwig
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 01/14] vfio: Move vfio_iommu_group_get() to vfio_register_group_dev() Christoph Hellwig
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 02/14] vfio: factor out a vfio_iommu_driver_allowed helper Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-24 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
  2021-08-24 23:31   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 04/14] vfio: factor out a vfio_group_find_or_alloc helper Christoph Hellwig
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-08-24 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger,
	Jason Gunthorpe, kvm

vfio_noiommu_attach_group has two callers:

 1) __vfio_container_attach_groups is called by vfio_ioctl_set_iommu,
    which just called vfio_iommu_driver_allowed
 2) vfio_group_set_container requires already checks ->noiommu on the
    vfio_group, which is propagated from the iommudata in
    vfio_create_group

so this check is entirely superflous and can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
index 6705349ed93378..00aeef5bb29abd 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static long vfio_noiommu_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
 static int vfio_noiommu_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
 				     struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
 {
-	return iommu_group_get_iommudata(iommu_group) == &noiommu ? 0 : -EINVAL;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static void vfio_noiommu_detach_group(void *iommu_data,
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 04/14] vfio: factor out a vfio_group_find_or_alloc helper
  2021-08-24 14:46 cleanup vfio iommu_group creation v2 Christoph Hellwig
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 03/14] vfio: remove the iommudata check in vfio_noiommu_attach_group Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-24 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
  2021-08-24 23:40   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 05/14] vfio: refactor noiommu group creation Christoph Hellwig
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-08-24 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger,
	Jason Gunthorpe, kvm

Factor out a helper to find or allocate the vfio_group to reduce the
spagetthi code in vfio_register_group_dev a little.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
index 00aeef5bb29abd..9e97ad36a1c052 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
@@ -833,10 +833,32 @@ void vfio_uninit_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_uninit_group_dev);
 
+struct vfio_group *vfio_group_find_or_alloc(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct iommu_group *iommu_group;
+	struct vfio_group *group;
+
+	iommu_group = vfio_iommu_group_get(dev);
+	if (!iommu_group)
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
+	/*
+	 * A found vfio_group already holds a reference to the iommu_group.
+	 * A created vfio_group keeps the reference.
+	 */
+	group = vfio_group_get_from_iommu(iommu_group);
+	if (!group) {
+		group = vfio_create_group(iommu_group);
+		if (!IS_ERR(group))
+			return group;
+	}
+	vfio_iommu_group_put(iommu_group, dev);
+	return group;
+}
+
 int vfio_register_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
 {
 	struct vfio_device *existing_device;
-	struct iommu_group *iommu_group;
 	struct vfio_group *group;
 
 	/*
@@ -846,31 +868,16 @@ int vfio_register_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
 	if (!device->dev_set)
 		vfio_assign_device_set(device, device);
 
-	iommu_group = vfio_iommu_group_get(device->dev);
-	if (!iommu_group)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	group = vfio_group_get_from_iommu(iommu_group);
-	if (!group) {
-		group = vfio_create_group(iommu_group);
-		if (IS_ERR(group)) {
-			vfio_iommu_group_put(iommu_group, device->dev);
-			return PTR_ERR(group);
-		}
-	} else {
-		/*
-		 * A found vfio_group already holds a reference to the
-		 * iommu_group.  A created vfio_group keeps the reference.
-		 */
-		vfio_iommu_group_put(iommu_group, device->dev);
-	}
+	group = vfio_group_find_or_alloc(device->dev);
+	if (IS_ERR(group))
+		return PTR_ERR(group);
 
 	existing_device = vfio_group_get_device(group, device->dev);
 	if (existing_device) {
 		dev_WARN(device->dev, "Device already exists on group %d\n",
-			 iommu_group_id(iommu_group));
+			 iommu_group_id(group->iommu_group));
 		vfio_device_put(existing_device);
-		vfio_iommu_group_put(iommu_group, device->dev);
+		vfio_iommu_group_put(group->iommu_group, device->dev);
 		return -EBUSY;
 	}
 
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 05/14] vfio: refactor noiommu group creation
  2021-08-24 14:46 cleanup vfio iommu_group creation v2 Christoph Hellwig
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 04/14] vfio: factor out a vfio_group_find_or_alloc helper Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-24 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
  2021-08-24 23:43   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 06/14] vfio: remove the iommudata hack for noiommu groups Christoph Hellwig
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-08-24 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger,
	Jason Gunthorpe, kvm

Split the actual noiommu group creation from vfio_iommu_group_get into a
new helper, and open code the rest of vfio_iommu_group_get in its only
caller.  This creates an antirely separate and clear code path for the
noiommu group creation.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
index 9e97ad36a1c052..53e0d52f3b0209 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
@@ -169,50 +169,6 @@ static void vfio_release_device_set(struct vfio_device *device)
 	xa_unlock(&vfio_device_set_xa);
 }
 
-static struct iommu_group *vfio_iommu_group_get(struct device *dev)
-{
-	struct iommu_group *group;
-	int __maybe_unused ret;
-
-	group = iommu_group_get(dev);
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU
-	/*
-	 * With noiommu enabled, an IOMMU group will be created for a device
-	 * that doesn't already have one and doesn't have an iommu_ops on their
-	 * bus.  We set iommudata simply to be able to identify these groups
-	 * as special use and for reclamation later.
-	 */
-	if (group || !noiommu || iommu_present(dev->bus))
-		return group;
-
-	group = iommu_group_alloc();
-	if (IS_ERR(group))
-		return NULL;
-
-	iommu_group_set_name(group, "vfio-noiommu");
-	iommu_group_set_iommudata(group, &noiommu, NULL);
-	ret = iommu_group_add_device(group, dev);
-	if (ret) {
-		iommu_group_put(group);
-		return NULL;
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * Where to taint?  At this point we've added an IOMMU group for a
-	 * device that is not backed by iommu_ops, therefore any iommu_
-	 * callback using iommu_ops can legitimately Oops.  So, while we may
-	 * be about to give a DMA capable device to a user without IOMMU
-	 * protection, which is clearly taint-worthy, let's go ahead and do
-	 * it here.
-	 */
-	add_taint(TAINT_USER, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
-	dev_warn(dev, "Adding kernel taint for vfio-noiommu group on device\n");
-#endif
-
-	return group;
-}
-
 static void vfio_iommu_group_put(struct iommu_group *group, struct device *dev)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU
@@ -833,12 +789,61 @@ void vfio_uninit_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_uninit_group_dev);
 
-struct vfio_group *vfio_group_find_or_alloc(struct device *dev)
+#ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU
+static struct vfio_group *vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct iommu_group *iommu_group;
 	struct vfio_group *group;
+	int ret;
+
+	iommu_group = iommu_group_alloc();
+	if (IS_ERR(iommu_group))
+		return ERR_CAST(iommu_group);
 
-	iommu_group = vfio_iommu_group_get(dev);
+	iommu_group_set_name(iommu_group, "vfio-noiommu");
+	iommu_group_set_iommudata(iommu_group, &noiommu, NULL);
+	ret = iommu_group_add_device(iommu_group, dev);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out_put_group;
+
+	group = vfio_create_group(iommu_group);
+	if (IS_ERR(group)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(group);
+		goto out_remove_device;
+	}
+
+	return group;
+
+out_remove_device:
+	iommu_group_remove_device(dev);
+out_put_group:
+	iommu_group_put(iommu_group);
+	return ERR_PTR(ret);
+}
+#endif
+
+static struct vfio_group *vfio_group_find_or_alloc(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct iommu_group *iommu_group;
+	struct vfio_group *group;
+
+	iommu_group = iommu_group_get(dev);
+#ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU
+	if (!iommu_group && noiommu && !iommu_present(dev->bus)) {
+		/*
+		 * With noiommu enabled, create an IOMMU group for devices that
+		 * don't already have one and don't have an iommu_ops on their
+		 * bus.  Taint the kernel because we're about to give a DMA
+		 * capable device to a user without IOMMU protection.
+		 */
+		group = vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(dev);
+		if (group) {
+			add_taint(TAINT_USER, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
+			dev_warn(dev, "Adding kernel taint for vfio-noiommu group on device\n");
+		}
+		return group;
+	}
+#endif
 	if (!iommu_group)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
@@ -852,7 +857,8 @@ struct vfio_group *vfio_group_find_or_alloc(struct device *dev)
 		if (!IS_ERR(group))
 			return group;
 	}
-	vfio_iommu_group_put(iommu_group, dev);
+
+	iommu_group_put(iommu_group);
 	return group;
 }
 
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 06/14] vfio: remove the iommudata hack for noiommu groups
  2021-08-24 14:46 cleanup vfio iommu_group creation v2 Christoph Hellwig
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 05/14] vfio: refactor noiommu group creation Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-24 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
  2021-08-24 23:45   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 07/14] vfio: simplify iommu group allocation for mediated devices Christoph Hellwig
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-08-24 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger,
	Jason Gunthorpe, kvm

Just pass a noiommu argument to vfio_create_group and set up the
->noiommu flag directly, and remove the now superflous
vfio_iommu_group_put helper.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio.c | 30 +++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
index 53e0d52f3b0209..f44532fed5bb4f 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
@@ -169,16 +169,6 @@ static void vfio_release_device_set(struct vfio_device *device)
 	xa_unlock(&vfio_device_set_xa);
 }
 
-static void vfio_iommu_group_put(struct iommu_group *group, struct device *dev)
-{
-#ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU
-	if (iommu_group_get_iommudata(group) == &noiommu)
-		iommu_group_remove_device(dev);
-#endif
-
-	iommu_group_put(group);
-}
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU
 static void *vfio_noiommu_open(unsigned long arg)
 {
@@ -345,7 +335,8 @@ static void vfio_group_unlock_and_free(struct vfio_group *group)
 /**
  * Group objects - create, release, get, put, search
  */
-static struct vfio_group *vfio_create_group(struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
+static struct vfio_group *vfio_create_group(struct iommu_group *iommu_group,
+		bool noiommu)
 {
 	struct vfio_group *group, *tmp;
 	struct device *dev;
@@ -364,9 +355,7 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_create_group(struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
 	atomic_set(&group->opened, 0);
 	init_waitqueue_head(&group->container_q);
 	group->iommu_group = iommu_group;
-#ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU
-	group->noiommu = (iommu_group_get_iommudata(iommu_group) == &noiommu);
-#endif
+	group->noiommu = noiommu;
 	BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&group->notifier);
 
 	group->nb.notifier_call = vfio_iommu_group_notifier;
@@ -801,12 +790,11 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(struct device *dev)
 		return ERR_CAST(iommu_group);
 
 	iommu_group_set_name(iommu_group, "vfio-noiommu");
-	iommu_group_set_iommudata(iommu_group, &noiommu, NULL);
 	ret = iommu_group_add_device(iommu_group, dev);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out_put_group;
 
-	group = vfio_create_group(iommu_group);
+	group = vfio_create_group(iommu_group, true);
 	if (IS_ERR(group)) {
 		ret = PTR_ERR(group);
 		goto out_remove_device;
@@ -853,7 +841,7 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_group_find_or_alloc(struct device *dev)
 	 */
 	group = vfio_group_get_from_iommu(iommu_group);
 	if (!group) {
-		group = vfio_create_group(iommu_group);
+		group = vfio_create_group(iommu_group, false);
 		if (!IS_ERR(group))
 			return group;
 	}
@@ -883,7 +871,9 @@ int vfio_register_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
 		dev_WARN(device->dev, "Device already exists on group %d\n",
 			 iommu_group_id(group->iommu_group));
 		vfio_device_put(existing_device);
-		vfio_iommu_group_put(group->iommu_group, device->dev);
+		if (group->noiommu)
+			iommu_group_remove_device(device->dev);
+		iommu_group_put(group->iommu_group);
 		return -EBUSY;
 	}
 
@@ -1028,7 +1018,9 @@ void vfio_unregister_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
 	if (list_empty(&group->device_list))
 		wait_event(group->container_q, !group->container);
 
-	vfio_iommu_group_put(group->iommu_group, device->dev);
+	if (group->noiommu)
+		iommu_group_remove_device(device->dev);
+	iommu_group_put(group->iommu_group);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_unregister_group_dev);
 
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 07/14] vfio: simplify iommu group allocation for mediated devices
  2021-08-24 14:46 cleanup vfio iommu_group creation v2 Christoph Hellwig
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 06/14] vfio: remove the iommudata hack for noiommu groups Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-24 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
  2021-08-25  0:19   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 08/14] vfio: remove unused method from vfio_iommu_driver_ops Christoph Hellwig
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-08-24 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger,
	Jason Gunthorpe, kvm

Reuse the logic in vfio_noiommu_group_alloc to allocate a single-device
iommu group for mediated device.  For this a new
vfio_register_mediated_dev is added that calls vfio_noiommu_group_alloc.
The noiommu boolean in struct vfio_group is replaced with a set of flags
to that mediated devices can be distinguished from noiommu devices.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_driver.c | 46 ++---------------------
 drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c   |  2 +-
 drivers/vfio/vfio.c             | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 include/linux/vfio.h            |  1 +
 samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c      |  2 +-
 samples/vfio-mdev/mdpy.c        |  2 +-
 samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c        |  2 +-
 7 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_driver.c b/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_driver.c
index c368ec824e2b5c..14b9ab17426838 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_driver.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_driver.c
@@ -13,61 +13,23 @@
 
 #include "mdev_private.h"
 
-static int mdev_attach_iommu(struct mdev_device *mdev)
-{
-	int ret;
-	struct iommu_group *group;
-
-	group = iommu_group_alloc();
-	if (IS_ERR(group))
-		return PTR_ERR(group);
-
-	ret = iommu_group_add_device(group, &mdev->dev);
-	if (!ret)
-		dev_info(&mdev->dev, "MDEV: group_id = %d\n",
-			 iommu_group_id(group));
-
-	iommu_group_put(group);
-	return ret;
-}
-
-static void mdev_detach_iommu(struct mdev_device *mdev)
-{
-	iommu_group_remove_device(&mdev->dev);
-	dev_info(&mdev->dev, "MDEV: detaching iommu\n");
-}
-
 static int mdev_probe(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct mdev_driver *drv =
 		container_of(dev->driver, struct mdev_driver, driver);
-	struct mdev_device *mdev = to_mdev_device(dev);
-	int ret;
-
-	ret = mdev_attach_iommu(mdev);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
 
-	if (drv->probe) {
-		ret = drv->probe(mdev);
-		if (ret)
-			mdev_detach_iommu(mdev);
-	}
-
-	return ret;
+	if (!drv->probe)
+		return 0;
+	return drv->probe(to_mdev_device(dev));
 }
 
 static int mdev_remove(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct mdev_driver *drv =
 		container_of(dev->driver, struct mdev_driver, driver);
-	struct mdev_device *mdev = to_mdev_device(dev);
 
 	if (drv->remove)
-		drv->remove(mdev);
-
-	mdev_detach_iommu(mdev);
-
+		drv->remove(to_mdev_device(dev));
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c b/drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c
index 7a9883048216e7..7bab075173145b 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static int vfio_mdev_probe(struct mdev_device *mdev)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	vfio_init_group_dev(vdev, &mdev->dev, &vfio_mdev_dev_ops);
-	ret = vfio_register_group_dev(vdev);
+	ret = vfio_register_mediated_dev(vdev);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out_uninit;
 
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
index f44532fed5bb4f..45987dc897179e 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
@@ -67,6 +67,9 @@ struct vfio_unbound_dev {
 	struct list_head		unbound_next;
 };
 
+#define VFIO_MEDIATED	(1 << 0)
+#define VFIO_NOIOMMU	(1 << 1)
+
 struct vfio_group {
 	struct kref			kref;
 	int				minor;
@@ -83,7 +86,7 @@ struct vfio_group {
 	struct mutex			unbound_lock;
 	atomic_t			opened;
 	wait_queue_head_t		container_q;
-	bool				noiommu;
+	unsigned int			flags;
 	unsigned int			dev_counter;
 	struct kvm			*kvm;
 	struct blocking_notifier_head	notifier;
@@ -336,7 +339,7 @@ static void vfio_group_unlock_and_free(struct vfio_group *group)
  * Group objects - create, release, get, put, search
  */
 static struct vfio_group *vfio_create_group(struct iommu_group *iommu_group,
-		bool noiommu)
+		unsigned int flags)
 {
 	struct vfio_group *group, *tmp;
 	struct device *dev;
@@ -355,7 +358,7 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_create_group(struct iommu_group *iommu_group,
 	atomic_set(&group->opened, 0);
 	init_waitqueue_head(&group->container_q);
 	group->iommu_group = iommu_group;
-	group->noiommu = noiommu;
+	group->flags = flags;
 	BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&group->notifier);
 
 	group->nb.notifier_call = vfio_iommu_group_notifier;
@@ -391,8 +394,8 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_create_group(struct iommu_group *iommu_group,
 	}
 
 	dev = device_create(vfio.class, NULL,
-			    MKDEV(MAJOR(vfio.group_devt), minor),
-			    group, "%s%d", group->noiommu ? "noiommu-" : "",
+			    MKDEV(MAJOR(vfio.group_devt), minor), group, "%s%d",
+			    (group->flags & VFIO_NOIOMMU) ? "noiommu-" : "",
 			    iommu_group_id(iommu_group));
 	if (IS_ERR(dev)) {
 		vfio_free_group_minor(minor);
@@ -778,8 +781,8 @@ void vfio_uninit_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_uninit_group_dev);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU
-static struct vfio_group *vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(struct device *dev)
+static struct vfio_group *vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(struct device *dev,
+		unsigned int flags)
 {
 	struct iommu_group *iommu_group;
 	struct vfio_group *group;
@@ -794,7 +797,7 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(struct device *dev)
 	if (ret)
 		goto out_put_group;
 
-	group = vfio_create_group(iommu_group, true);
+	group = vfio_create_group(iommu_group, flags);
 	if (IS_ERR(group)) {
 		ret = PTR_ERR(group);
 		goto out_remove_device;
@@ -808,7 +811,6 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(struct device *dev)
 	iommu_group_put(iommu_group);
 	return ERR_PTR(ret);
 }
-#endif
 
 static struct vfio_group *vfio_group_find_or_alloc(struct device *dev)
 {
@@ -824,7 +826,7 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_group_find_or_alloc(struct device *dev)
 		 * bus.  Taint the kernel because we're about to give a DMA
 		 * capable device to a user without IOMMU protection.
 		 */
-		group = vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(dev);
+		group = vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(dev, VFIO_NOIOMMU);
 		if (group) {
 			add_taint(TAINT_USER, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
 			dev_warn(dev, "Adding kernel taint for vfio-noiommu group on device\n");
@@ -841,7 +843,7 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_group_find_or_alloc(struct device *dev)
 	 */
 	group = vfio_group_get_from_iommu(iommu_group);
 	if (!group) {
-		group = vfio_create_group(iommu_group, false);
+		group = vfio_create_group(iommu_group, 0);
 		if (!IS_ERR(group))
 			return group;
 	}
@@ -850,10 +852,13 @@ static struct vfio_group *vfio_group_find_or_alloc(struct device *dev)
 	return group;
 }
 
-int vfio_register_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
+static int __vfio_register_dev(struct vfio_device *device,
+		struct vfio_group *group)
 {
 	struct vfio_device *existing_device;
-	struct vfio_group *group;
+
+	if (IS_ERR(group))
+		return PTR_ERR(group);
 
 	/*
 	 * If the driver doesn't specify a set then the device is added to a
@@ -862,16 +867,12 @@ int vfio_register_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
 	if (!device->dev_set)
 		vfio_assign_device_set(device, device);
 
-	group = vfio_group_find_or_alloc(device->dev);
-	if (IS_ERR(group))
-		return PTR_ERR(group);
-
 	existing_device = vfio_group_get_device(group, device->dev);
 	if (existing_device) {
 		dev_WARN(device->dev, "Device already exists on group %d\n",
 			 iommu_group_id(group->iommu_group));
 		vfio_device_put(existing_device);
-		if (group->noiommu)
+		if (group->flags & (VFIO_NOIOMMU | VFIO_MEDIATED))
 			iommu_group_remove_device(device->dev);
 		iommu_group_put(group->iommu_group);
 		return -EBUSY;
@@ -890,8 +891,21 @@ int vfio_register_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
 
 	return 0;
 }
+
+int vfio_register_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+	return __vfio_register_dev(device,
+		vfio_group_find_or_alloc(device->dev));
+}
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_register_group_dev);
 
+int vfio_register_mediated_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+	return __vfio_register_dev(device,
+		vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(device->dev, VFIO_MEDIATED));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_register_mediated_dev);
+
 /**
  * Get a reference to the vfio_device for a device.  Even if the
  * caller thinks they own the device, they could be racing with a
@@ -1018,7 +1032,7 @@ void vfio_unregister_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
 	if (list_empty(&group->device_list))
 		wait_event(group->container_q, !group->container);
 
-	if (group->noiommu)
+	if (group->flags & (VFIO_NOIOMMU | VFIO_MEDIATED))
 		iommu_group_remove_device(device->dev);
 	iommu_group_put(group->iommu_group);
 }
@@ -1365,7 +1379,7 @@ static int vfio_group_set_container(struct vfio_group *group, int container_fd)
 	if (atomic_read(&group->container_users))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (group->noiommu && !capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
+	if ((group->flags & VFIO_NOIOMMU) && !capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
 		return -EPERM;
 
 	f = fdget(container_fd);
@@ -1385,7 +1399,7 @@ static int vfio_group_set_container(struct vfio_group *group, int container_fd)
 
 	/* Real groups and fake groups cannot mix */
 	if (!list_empty(&container->group_list) &&
-	    container->noiommu != group->noiommu) {
+	    container->noiommu != (group->flags & VFIO_NOIOMMU)) {
 		ret = -EPERM;
 		goto unlock_out;
 	}
@@ -1399,7 +1413,7 @@ static int vfio_group_set_container(struct vfio_group *group, int container_fd)
 	}
 
 	group->container = container;
-	container->noiommu = group->noiommu;
+	container->noiommu = (group->flags & VFIO_NOIOMMU);
 	list_add(&group->container_next, &container->group_list);
 
 	/* Get a reference on the container and mark a user within the group */
@@ -1423,7 +1437,7 @@ static int vfio_group_add_container_user(struct vfio_group *group)
 	if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&group->container_users))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (group->noiommu) {
+	if (group->flags & VFIO_NOIOMMU) {
 		atomic_dec(&group->container_users);
 		return -EPERM;
 	}
@@ -1448,7 +1462,7 @@ static int vfio_group_get_device_fd(struct vfio_group *group, char *buf)
 	    !group->container->iommu_driver || !vfio_group_viable(group))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (group->noiommu && !capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
+	if ((group->flags & VFIO_NOIOMMU) && !capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
 		return -EPERM;
 
 	device = vfio_device_get_from_name(group, buf);
@@ -1495,7 +1509,7 @@ static int vfio_group_get_device_fd(struct vfio_group *group, char *buf)
 
 	fd_install(fdno, filep);
 
-	if (group->noiommu)
+	if (group->flags & VFIO_NOIOMMU)
 		dev_warn(device->dev, "vfio-noiommu device opened by user "
 			 "(%s:%d)\n", current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
 	return fdno;
@@ -1591,7 +1605,7 @@ static int vfio_group_fops_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
 	if (!group)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	if (group->noiommu && !capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO)) {
+	if ((group->flags & VFIO_NOIOMMU) && !capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO)) {
 		vfio_group_put(group);
 		return -EPERM;
 	}
diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
index f7083c2fd0d099..2ffbb2d02c9346 100644
--- a/include/linux/vfio.h
+++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ void vfio_init_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device, struct device *dev,
 			 const struct vfio_device_ops *ops);
 void vfio_uninit_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device);
 int vfio_register_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device);
+int vfio_register_mediated_dev(struct vfio_device *device);
 void vfio_unregister_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device);
 extern struct vfio_device *vfio_device_get_from_dev(struct device *dev);
 extern void vfio_device_put(struct vfio_device *device);
diff --git a/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c b/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c
index c313ab4d1f4e4e..f59218e03dd1b4 100644
--- a/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c
+++ b/samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c
@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ static int mbochs_probe(struct mdev_device *mdev)
 	mbochs_create_config_space(mdev_state);
 	mbochs_reset(mdev_state);
 
-	ret = vfio_register_group_dev(&mdev_state->vdev);
+	ret = vfio_register_mediated_dev(&mdev_state->vdev);
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_mem;
 	dev_set_drvdata(&mdev->dev, mdev_state);
diff --git a/samples/vfio-mdev/mdpy.c b/samples/vfio-mdev/mdpy.c
index 8d1a80a0722aa9..4df380014ad914 100644
--- a/samples/vfio-mdev/mdpy.c
+++ b/samples/vfio-mdev/mdpy.c
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static int mdpy_probe(struct mdev_device *mdev)
 
 	mdpy_count++;
 
-	ret = vfio_register_group_dev(&mdev_state->vdev);
+	ret = vfio_register_mediated_dev(&mdev_state->vdev);
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_mem;
 	dev_set_drvdata(&mdev->dev, mdev_state);
diff --git a/samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c b/samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c
index 5983cdb16e3d1d..ef9f48bfe8d04f 100644
--- a/samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c
+++ b/samples/vfio-mdev/mtty.c
@@ -741,7 +741,7 @@ static int mtty_probe(struct mdev_device *mdev)
 
 	mtty_create_config_space(mdev_state);
 
-	ret = vfio_register_group_dev(&mdev_state->vdev);
+	ret = vfio_register_mediated_dev(&mdev_state->vdev);
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_vconfig;
 	dev_set_drvdata(&mdev->dev, mdev_state);
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 08/14] vfio: remove unused method from vfio_iommu_driver_ops
  2021-08-24 14:46 cleanup vfio iommu_group creation v2 Christoph Hellwig
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 07/14] vfio: simplify iommu group allocation for mediated devices Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-24 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
  2021-08-25  0:21   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 09/14] vfio: move the vfio_iommu_driver_ops interface out of <linux/vfio.h> Christoph Hellwig
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-08-24 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger,
	Jason Gunthorpe, kvm

The read, write and mmap methods are never implemented, so remove them.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio.c  | 50 --------------------------------------------
 include/linux/vfio.h |  5 -----
 2 files changed, 55 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
index 45987dc897179e..34621e0044e8b4 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
@@ -1247,62 +1247,12 @@ static int vfio_fops_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-/*
- * Once an iommu driver is set, we optionally pass read/write/mmap
- * on to the driver, allowing management interfaces beyond ioctl.
- */
-static ssize_t vfio_fops_read(struct file *filep, char __user *buf,
-			      size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
-{
-	struct vfio_container *container = filep->private_data;
-	struct vfio_iommu_driver *driver;
-	ssize_t ret = -EINVAL;
-
-	driver = container->iommu_driver;
-	if (likely(driver && driver->ops->read))
-		ret = driver->ops->read(container->iommu_data,
-					buf, count, ppos);
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
-static ssize_t vfio_fops_write(struct file *filep, const char __user *buf,
-			       size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
-{
-	struct vfio_container *container = filep->private_data;
-	struct vfio_iommu_driver *driver;
-	ssize_t ret = -EINVAL;
-
-	driver = container->iommu_driver;
-	if (likely(driver && driver->ops->write))
-		ret = driver->ops->write(container->iommu_data,
-					 buf, count, ppos);
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
-static int vfio_fops_mmap(struct file *filep, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
-{
-	struct vfio_container *container = filep->private_data;
-	struct vfio_iommu_driver *driver;
-	int ret = -EINVAL;
-
-	driver = container->iommu_driver;
-	if (likely(driver && driver->ops->mmap))
-		ret = driver->ops->mmap(container->iommu_data, vma);
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
 static const struct file_operations vfio_fops = {
 	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
 	.open		= vfio_fops_open,
 	.release	= vfio_fops_release,
-	.read		= vfio_fops_read,
-	.write		= vfio_fops_write,
 	.unlocked_ioctl	= vfio_fops_unl_ioctl,
 	.compat_ioctl	= compat_ptr_ioctl,
-	.mmap		= vfio_fops_mmap,
 };
 
 /**
diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
index 2ffbb2d02c9346..82042690d7978d 100644
--- a/include/linux/vfio.h
+++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
@@ -95,13 +95,8 @@ struct vfio_iommu_driver_ops {
 	struct module	*owner;
 	void		*(*open)(unsigned long arg);
 	void		(*release)(void *iommu_data);
-	ssize_t		(*read)(void *iommu_data, char __user *buf,
-				size_t count, loff_t *ppos);
-	ssize_t		(*write)(void *iommu_data, const char __user *buf,
-				 size_t count, loff_t *size);
 	long		(*ioctl)(void *iommu_data, unsigned int cmd,
 				 unsigned long arg);
-	int		(*mmap)(void *iommu_data, struct vm_area_struct *vma);
 	int		(*attach_group)(void *iommu_data,
 					struct iommu_group *group);
 	void		(*detach_group)(void *iommu_data,
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 09/14] vfio: move the vfio_iommu_driver_ops interface out of <linux/vfio.h>
  2021-08-24 14:46 cleanup vfio iommu_group creation v2 Christoph Hellwig
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 08/14] vfio: remove unused method from vfio_iommu_driver_ops Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-24 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
  2021-08-25  0:25   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 10/14] vfio: remove the unused mdev iommu hook Christoph Hellwig
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-08-24 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger,
	Jason Gunthorpe, kvm

Create a new private drivers/vfio/vfio.h header for the interface between
the VFIO core and the iommu drivers.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio.c                 |  1 +
 drivers/vfio/vfio.h                 | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c |  1 +
 drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c     |  1 +
 include/linux/vfio.h                | 44 ---------------------------
 5 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/vfio/vfio.h

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
index 34621e0044e8b4..26663dfa19e70d 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
 #include <linux/vfio.h>
 #include <linux/wait.h>
 #include <linux/sched/signal.h>
+#include "vfio.h"
 
 #define DRIVER_VERSION	"0.3"
 #define DRIVER_AUTHOR	"Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>"
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..a78de649eb2f16
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2012 Red Hat, Inc.  All rights reserved.
+ *     Author: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
+ */
+
+/* events for the backend driver notify callback */
+enum vfio_iommu_notify_type {
+	VFIO_IOMMU_CONTAINER_CLOSE = 0,
+};
+
+/**
+ * struct vfio_iommu_driver_ops - VFIO IOMMU driver callbacks
+ */
+struct vfio_iommu_driver_ops {
+	char		*name;
+	struct module	*owner;
+	void		*(*open)(unsigned long arg);
+	void		(*release)(void *iommu_data);
+	long		(*ioctl)(void *iommu_data, unsigned int cmd,
+				 unsigned long arg);
+	int		(*attach_group)(void *iommu_data,
+					struct iommu_group *group);
+	void		(*detach_group)(void *iommu_data,
+					struct iommu_group *group);
+	int		(*pin_pages)(void *iommu_data,
+				     struct iommu_group *group,
+				     unsigned long *user_pfn,
+				     int npage, int prot,
+				     unsigned long *phys_pfn);
+	int		(*unpin_pages)(void *iommu_data,
+				       unsigned long *user_pfn, int npage);
+	int		(*register_notifier)(void *iommu_data,
+					     unsigned long *events,
+					     struct notifier_block *nb);
+	int		(*unregister_notifier)(void *iommu_data,
+					       struct notifier_block *nb);
+	int		(*dma_rw)(void *iommu_data, dma_addr_t user_iova,
+				  void *data, size_t count, bool write);
+	struct iommu_domain *(*group_iommu_domain)(void *iommu_data,
+						   struct iommu_group *group);
+	void		(*notify)(void *iommu_data,
+				  enum vfio_iommu_notify_type event);
+};
+
+int vfio_register_iommu_driver(const struct vfio_iommu_driver_ops *ops);
+void vfio_unregister_iommu_driver(const struct vfio_iommu_driver_ops *ops);
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
index fe888b5dcc0062..3efd09faeca4a8 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
 #include <linux/sched/mm.h>
 #include <linux/sched/signal.h>
 #include <linux/mm.h>
+#include "vfio.h"
 
 #include <asm/iommu.h>
 #include <asm/tce.h>
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
index 0b4f7c174c7a2b..92777797578e50 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
 #include <linux/notifier.h>
 #include <linux/dma-iommu.h>
 #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
+#include "vfio.h"
 
 #define DRIVER_VERSION  "0.2"
 #define DRIVER_AUTHOR   "Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>"
diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
index 82042690d7978d..5df56626751efd 100644
--- a/include/linux/vfio.h
+++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
@@ -82,50 +82,6 @@ extern void vfio_device_put(struct vfio_device *device);
 
 int vfio_assign_device_set(struct vfio_device *device, void *set_id);
 
-/* events for the backend driver notify callback */
-enum vfio_iommu_notify_type {
-	VFIO_IOMMU_CONTAINER_CLOSE = 0,
-};
-
-/**
- * struct vfio_iommu_driver_ops - VFIO IOMMU driver callbacks
- */
-struct vfio_iommu_driver_ops {
-	char		*name;
-	struct module	*owner;
-	void		*(*open)(unsigned long arg);
-	void		(*release)(void *iommu_data);
-	long		(*ioctl)(void *iommu_data, unsigned int cmd,
-				 unsigned long arg);
-	int		(*attach_group)(void *iommu_data,
-					struct iommu_group *group);
-	void		(*detach_group)(void *iommu_data,
-					struct iommu_group *group);
-	int		(*pin_pages)(void *iommu_data,
-				     struct iommu_group *group,
-				     unsigned long *user_pfn,
-				     int npage, int prot,
-				     unsigned long *phys_pfn);
-	int		(*unpin_pages)(void *iommu_data,
-				       unsigned long *user_pfn, int npage);
-	int		(*register_notifier)(void *iommu_data,
-					     unsigned long *events,
-					     struct notifier_block *nb);
-	int		(*unregister_notifier)(void *iommu_data,
-					       struct notifier_block *nb);
-	int		(*dma_rw)(void *iommu_data, dma_addr_t user_iova,
-				  void *data, size_t count, bool write);
-	struct iommu_domain *(*group_iommu_domain)(void *iommu_data,
-						   struct iommu_group *group);
-	void		(*notify)(void *iommu_data,
-				  enum vfio_iommu_notify_type event);
-};
-
-extern int vfio_register_iommu_driver(const struct vfio_iommu_driver_ops *ops);
-
-extern void vfio_unregister_iommu_driver(
-				const struct vfio_iommu_driver_ops *ops);
-
 /*
  * External user API
  */
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 10/14] vfio: remove the unused mdev iommu hook
  2021-08-24 14:46 cleanup vfio iommu_group creation v2 Christoph Hellwig
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 09/14] vfio: move the vfio_iommu_driver_ops interface out of <linux/vfio.h> Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-24 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
  2021-08-25  0:25   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 11/14] vfio: clean up the check for mediated device in vfio_iommu_type1 Christoph Hellwig
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-08-24 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger,
	Jason Gunthorpe, kvm

The iommu_device field in struct mdev_device has never been used
since it was added more than 2 years ago.

This is a manual revert of commit 7bd50f0cd2
("vfio/type1: Add domain at(de)taching group helpers").

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 133 +++++++-------------------------
 include/linux/mdev.h            |  20 -----
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
index 92777797578e50..39e2706d0b3f34 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
@@ -114,7 +114,6 @@ struct vfio_batch {
 struct vfio_iommu_group {
 	struct iommu_group	*iommu_group;
 	struct list_head	next;
-	bool			mdev_group;	/* An mdev group */
 	bool			pinned_page_dirty_scope;
 };
 
@@ -1935,61 +1934,6 @@ static bool vfio_iommu_has_sw_msi(struct list_head *group_resv_regions,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int vfio_mdev_attach_domain(struct device *dev, void *data)
-{
-	struct mdev_device *mdev = to_mdev_device(dev);
-	struct iommu_domain *domain = data;
-	struct device *iommu_device;
-
-	iommu_device = mdev_get_iommu_device(mdev);
-	if (iommu_device) {
-		if (iommu_dev_feature_enabled(iommu_device, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_AUX))
-			return iommu_aux_attach_device(domain, iommu_device);
-		else
-			return iommu_attach_device(domain, iommu_device);
-	}
-
-	return -EINVAL;
-}
-
-static int vfio_mdev_detach_domain(struct device *dev, void *data)
-{
-	struct mdev_device *mdev = to_mdev_device(dev);
-	struct iommu_domain *domain = data;
-	struct device *iommu_device;
-
-	iommu_device = mdev_get_iommu_device(mdev);
-	if (iommu_device) {
-		if (iommu_dev_feature_enabled(iommu_device, IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_AUX))
-			iommu_aux_detach_device(domain, iommu_device);
-		else
-			iommu_detach_device(domain, iommu_device);
-	}
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static int vfio_iommu_attach_group(struct vfio_domain *domain,
-				   struct vfio_iommu_group *group)
-{
-	if (group->mdev_group)
-		return iommu_group_for_each_dev(group->iommu_group,
-						domain->domain,
-						vfio_mdev_attach_domain);
-	else
-		return iommu_attach_group(domain->domain, group->iommu_group);
-}
-
-static void vfio_iommu_detach_group(struct vfio_domain *domain,
-				    struct vfio_iommu_group *group)
-{
-	if (group->mdev_group)
-		iommu_group_for_each_dev(group->iommu_group, domain->domain,
-					 vfio_mdev_detach_domain);
-	else
-		iommu_detach_group(domain->domain, group->iommu_group);
-}
-
 static bool vfio_bus_is_mdev(struct bus_type *bus)
 {
 	struct bus_type *mdev_bus;
@@ -2004,20 +1948,6 @@ static bool vfio_bus_is_mdev(struct bus_type *bus)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int vfio_mdev_iommu_device(struct device *dev, void *data)
-{
-	struct mdev_device *mdev = to_mdev_device(dev);
-	struct device **old = data, *new;
-
-	new = mdev_get_iommu_device(mdev);
-	if (!new || (*old && *old != new))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	*old = new;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 /*
  * This is a helper function to insert an address range to iova list.
  * The list is initially created with a single entry corresponding to
@@ -2278,38 +2208,25 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
 		goto out_free;
 
 	if (vfio_bus_is_mdev(bus)) {
-		struct device *iommu_device = NULL;
-
-		group->mdev_group = true;
-
-		/* Determine the isolation type */
-		ret = iommu_group_for_each_dev(iommu_group, &iommu_device,
-					       vfio_mdev_iommu_device);
-		if (ret || !iommu_device) {
-			if (!iommu->external_domain) {
-				INIT_LIST_HEAD(&domain->group_list);
-				iommu->external_domain = domain;
-				vfio_update_pgsize_bitmap(iommu);
-			} else {
-				kfree(domain);
-			}
-
-			list_add(&group->next,
-				 &iommu->external_domain->group_list);
-			/*
-			 * Non-iommu backed group cannot dirty memory directly,
-			 * it can only use interfaces that provide dirty
-			 * tracking.
-			 * The iommu scope can only be promoted with the
-			 * addition of a dirty tracking group.
-			 */
-			group->pinned_page_dirty_scope = true;
-			mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
-
-			return 0;
+		if (!iommu->external_domain) {
+			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&domain->group_list);
+			iommu->external_domain = domain;
+			vfio_update_pgsize_bitmap(iommu);
+		} else {
+			kfree(domain);
 		}
 
-		bus = iommu_device->bus;
+		list_add(&group->next, &iommu->external_domain->group_list);
+		/*
+		 * Non-iommu backed group cannot dirty memory directly, it can
+		 * only use interfaces that provide dirty tracking.
+		 * The iommu scope can only be promoted with the addition of a
+		 * dirty tracking group.
+		 */
+		group->pinned_page_dirty_scope = true;
+		mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
+
+		return 0;
 	}
 
 	domain->domain = iommu_domain_alloc(bus);
@@ -2324,7 +2241,7 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
 			goto out_domain;
 	}
 
-	ret = vfio_iommu_attach_group(domain, group);
+	ret = iommu_attach_group(domain->domain, group->iommu_group);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out_domain;
 
@@ -2391,15 +2308,17 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
 	list_for_each_entry(d, &iommu->domain_list, next) {
 		if (d->domain->ops == domain->domain->ops &&
 		    d->prot == domain->prot) {
-			vfio_iommu_detach_group(domain, group);
-			if (!vfio_iommu_attach_group(d, group)) {
+			iommu_detach_group(domain->domain, group->iommu_group);
+			if (!iommu_attach_group(d->domain,
+						group->iommu_group)) {
 				list_add(&group->next, &d->group_list);
 				iommu_domain_free(domain->domain);
 				kfree(domain);
 				goto done;
 			}
 
-			ret = vfio_iommu_attach_group(domain, group);
+			ret = iommu_attach_group(domain->domain,
+						 group->iommu_group);
 			if (ret)
 				goto out_domain;
 		}
@@ -2436,7 +2355,7 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
 	return 0;
 
 out_detach:
-	vfio_iommu_detach_group(domain, group);
+	iommu_detach_group(domain->domain, group->iommu_group);
 out_domain:
 	iommu_domain_free(domain->domain);
 	vfio_iommu_iova_free(&iova_copy);
@@ -2601,7 +2520,7 @@ static void vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group(void *iommu_data,
 		if (!group)
 			continue;
 
-		vfio_iommu_detach_group(domain, group);
+		iommu_detach_group(domain->domain, group->iommu_group);
 		update_dirty_scope = !group->pinned_page_dirty_scope;
 		list_del(&group->next);
 		kfree(group);
@@ -2689,7 +2608,7 @@ static void vfio_release_domain(struct vfio_domain *domain, bool external)
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(group, group_tmp,
 				 &domain->group_list, next) {
 		if (!external)
-			vfio_iommu_detach_group(domain, group);
+			iommu_detach_group(domain->domain, group->iommu_group);
 		list_del(&group->next);
 		kfree(group);
 	}
diff --git a/include/linux/mdev.h b/include/linux/mdev.h
index 68427e8fadebd6..15d03f6532d073 100644
--- a/include/linux/mdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/mdev.h
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@ struct mdev_device {
 	void *driver_data;
 	struct list_head next;
 	struct mdev_type *type;
-	struct device *iommu_device;
 	bool active;
 };
 
@@ -27,25 +26,6 @@ static inline struct mdev_device *to_mdev_device(struct device *dev)
 	return container_of(dev, struct mdev_device, dev);
 }
 
-/*
- * Called by the parent device driver to set the device which represents
- * this mdev in iommu protection scope. By default, the iommu device is
- * NULL, that indicates using vendor defined isolation.
- *
- * @dev: the mediated device that iommu will isolate.
- * @iommu_device: a pci device which represents the iommu for @dev.
- */
-static inline void mdev_set_iommu_device(struct mdev_device *mdev,
-					 struct device *iommu_device)
-{
-	mdev->iommu_device = iommu_device;
-}
-
-static inline struct device *mdev_get_iommu_device(struct mdev_device *mdev)
-{
-	return mdev->iommu_device;
-}
-
 unsigned int mdev_get_type_group_id(struct mdev_device *mdev);
 unsigned int mtype_get_type_group_id(struct mdev_type *mtype);
 struct device *mtype_get_parent_dev(struct mdev_type *mtype);
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 11/14] vfio: clean up the check for mediated device in vfio_iommu_type1
  2021-08-24 14:46 cleanup vfio iommu_group creation v2 Christoph Hellwig
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 10/14] vfio: remove the unused mdev iommu hook Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-24 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
  2021-08-25  0:28   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 12/14] vfio/spapr_tce: reject mediated devices Christoph Hellwig
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  13 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-08-24 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger,
	Jason Gunthorpe, kvm

Pass the group flags to ->attach_group and remove the messy check for
the bus type.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio.c                 | 11 +++++------
 drivers/vfio/vfio.h                 |  7 ++++++-
 drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c |  2 +-
 drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c     | 19 ++-----------------
 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
index 26663dfa19e70d..a140ce3b15196d 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
@@ -68,9 +68,6 @@ struct vfio_unbound_dev {
 	struct list_head		unbound_next;
 };
 
-#define VFIO_MEDIATED	(1 << 0)
-#define VFIO_NOIOMMU	(1 << 1)
-
 struct vfio_group {
 	struct kref			kref;
 	int				minor;
@@ -198,7 +195,7 @@ static long vfio_noiommu_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
 }
 
 static int vfio_noiommu_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
-				     struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
+		struct iommu_group *iommu_group, unsigned int flags)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -1100,7 +1097,8 @@ static int __vfio_container_attach_groups(struct vfio_container *container,
 	int ret = -ENODEV;
 
 	list_for_each_entry(group, &container->group_list, container_next) {
-		ret = driver->ops->attach_group(data, group->iommu_group);
+		ret = driver->ops->attach_group(data, group->iommu_group,
+						group->flags);
 		if (ret)
 			goto unwind;
 	}
@@ -1358,7 +1356,8 @@ static int vfio_group_set_container(struct vfio_group *group, int container_fd)
 	driver = container->iommu_driver;
 	if (driver) {
 		ret = driver->ops->attach_group(container->iommu_data,
-						group->iommu_group);
+						group->iommu_group,
+						group->flags);
 		if (ret)
 			goto unlock_out;
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
index a78de649eb2f16..0c1a88fa991545 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.h
@@ -9,6 +9,10 @@ enum vfio_iommu_notify_type {
 	VFIO_IOMMU_CONTAINER_CLOSE = 0,
 };
 
+/* flags for group->flags and ->attach_group */
+#define VFIO_MEDIATED	(1 << 0)
+#define VFIO_NOIOMMU	(1 << 1)
+
 /**
  * struct vfio_iommu_driver_ops - VFIO IOMMU driver callbacks
  */
@@ -20,7 +24,8 @@ struct vfio_iommu_driver_ops {
 	long		(*ioctl)(void *iommu_data, unsigned int cmd,
 				 unsigned long arg);
 	int		(*attach_group)(void *iommu_data,
-					struct iommu_group *group);
+					struct iommu_group *group,
+					unsigned int flags);
 	void		(*detach_group)(void *iommu_data,
 					struct iommu_group *group);
 	int		(*pin_pages)(void *iommu_data,
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
index 3efd09faeca4a8..7567328d347d25 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
@@ -1239,7 +1239,7 @@ static long tce_iommu_take_ownership_ddw(struct tce_container *container,
 }
 
 static int tce_iommu_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
-		struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
+		struct iommu_group *iommu_group, unsigned int flags)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 	struct tce_container *container = iommu_data;
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
index 39e2706d0b3f34..44a3abdca580a0 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
@@ -36,7 +36,6 @@
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <linux/vfio.h>
 #include <linux/workqueue.h>
-#include <linux/mdev.h>
 #include <linux/notifier.h>
 #include <linux/dma-iommu.h>
 #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
@@ -1934,20 +1933,6 @@ static bool vfio_iommu_has_sw_msi(struct list_head *group_resv_regions,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static bool vfio_bus_is_mdev(struct bus_type *bus)
-{
-	struct bus_type *mdev_bus;
-	bool ret = false;
-
-	mdev_bus = symbol_get(mdev_bus_type);
-	if (mdev_bus) {
-		ret = (bus == mdev_bus);
-		symbol_put(mdev_bus_type);
-	}
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
 /*
  * This is a helper function to insert an address range to iova list.
  * The list is initially created with a single entry corresponding to
@@ -2172,7 +2157,7 @@ static void vfio_iommu_iova_insert_copy(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
 }
 
 static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
-					 struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
+		struct iommu_group *iommu_group, unsigned int flags)
 {
 	struct vfio_iommu *iommu = iommu_data;
 	struct vfio_iommu_group *group;
@@ -2207,7 +2192,7 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
 	if (ret)
 		goto out_free;
 
-	if (vfio_bus_is_mdev(bus)) {
+	if (flags & VFIO_MEDIATED) {
 		if (!iommu->external_domain) {
 			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&domain->group_list);
 			iommu->external_domain = domain;
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 12/14] vfio/spapr_tce: reject mediated devices
  2021-08-24 14:46 cleanup vfio iommu_group creation v2 Christoph Hellwig
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 11/14] vfio: clean up the check for mediated device in vfio_iommu_type1 Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-24 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
  2021-08-25  0:29   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 13/14] vfio/iommu_type1: remove the "external" domain Christoph Hellwig
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 14/14] vfio/iommu_type1: remove IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER Christoph Hellwig
  13 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-08-24 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger,
	Jason Gunthorpe, kvm

Unlike the the type1 IOMMU backend, the SPAPR one does not contain any
support for the magic non-IOMMU backed iommu_group used by mediated
devices, so reject them in ->attach_group.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
index 7567328d347d25..779d4e985d825f 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
@@ -1246,6 +1246,9 @@ static int tce_iommu_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
 	struct iommu_table_group *table_group;
 	struct tce_iommu_group *tcegrp = NULL;
 
+	if (flags & VFIO_MEDIATED)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	mutex_lock(&container->lock);
 
 	/* pr_debug("tce_vfio: Attaching group #%u to iommu %p\n",
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 13/14] vfio/iommu_type1: remove the "external" domain
  2021-08-24 14:46 cleanup vfio iommu_group creation v2 Christoph Hellwig
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 12/14] vfio/spapr_tce: reject mediated devices Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-24 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
  2021-08-25  0:36   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 14/14] vfio/iommu_type1: remove IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER Christoph Hellwig
  13 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-08-24 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger,
	Jason Gunthorpe, kvm

The external_domain concept rather misleading and not actually needed.
Replace it with a list of mediated groups in struct vfio_iommu and
document the purpose.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 123 +++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
index 44a3abdca580a0..205f13c05b236e 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
@@ -65,7 +65,6 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(dma_entry_limit,
 struct vfio_iommu {
 	struct list_head	domain_list;
 	struct list_head	iova_list;
-	struct vfio_domain	*external_domain; /* domain for external user */
 	struct mutex		lock;
 	struct rb_root		dma_list;
 	struct blocking_notifier_head notifier;
@@ -78,6 +77,12 @@ struct vfio_iommu {
 	bool			nesting;
 	bool			dirty_page_tracking;
 	bool			container_open;
+
+	/*
+	 * Tracks the fake iommu groups created by vfio to support mediated
+	 * devices.  These are not backed by an actual IOMMU.
+	 */
+	struct list_head	mediated_groups;
 };
 
 struct vfio_domain {
@@ -1892,8 +1897,8 @@ static struct vfio_iommu_group*
 vfio_iommu_find_iommu_group(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
 			    struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
 {
+	struct vfio_iommu_group *group;
 	struct vfio_domain *domain;
-	struct vfio_iommu_group *group = NULL;
 
 	list_for_each_entry(domain, &iommu->domain_list, next) {
 		group = find_iommu_group(domain, iommu_group);
@@ -1901,10 +1906,10 @@ vfio_iommu_find_iommu_group(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
 			return group;
 	}
 
-	if (iommu->external_domain)
-		group = find_iommu_group(iommu->external_domain, iommu_group);
-
-	return group;
+	list_for_each_entry(group, &iommu->mediated_groups, next)
+		if (group->iommu_group == iommu_group)
+			return group;
+	return NULL;
 }
 
 static bool vfio_iommu_has_sw_msi(struct list_head *group_resv_regions,
@@ -2163,45 +2168,27 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
 	struct vfio_iommu_group *group;
 	struct vfio_domain *domain, *d;
 	struct bus_type *bus = NULL;
-	int ret;
 	bool resv_msi, msi_remap;
 	phys_addr_t resv_msi_base = 0;
 	struct iommu_domain_geometry *geo;
 	LIST_HEAD(iova_copy);
 	LIST_HEAD(group_resv_regions);
+	int ret = -EINVAL;
 
 	mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
 
 	/* Check for duplicates */
-	if (vfio_iommu_find_iommu_group(iommu, iommu_group)) {
-		mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
+	if (vfio_iommu_find_iommu_group(iommu, iommu_group))
+		goto out_unlock;
 
+	ret = -ENOMEM;
 	group = kzalloc(sizeof(*group), GFP_KERNEL);
-	domain = kzalloc(sizeof(*domain), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!group || !domain) {
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto out_free;
-	}
-
+	if (!group)
+		goto out_unlock;
 	group->iommu_group = iommu_group;
 
-	/* Determine bus_type in order to allocate a domain */
-	ret = iommu_group_for_each_dev(iommu_group, &bus, vfio_bus_type);
-	if (ret)
-		goto out_free;
-
 	if (flags & VFIO_MEDIATED) {
-		if (!iommu->external_domain) {
-			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&domain->group_list);
-			iommu->external_domain = domain;
-			vfio_update_pgsize_bitmap(iommu);
-		} else {
-			kfree(domain);
-		}
-
-		list_add(&group->next, &iommu->external_domain->group_list);
+		list_add(&group->next, &iommu->mediated_groups);
 		/*
 		 * Non-iommu backed group cannot dirty memory directly, it can
 		 * only use interfaces that provide dirty tracking.
@@ -2209,16 +2196,24 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
 		 * dirty tracking group.
 		 */
 		group->pinned_page_dirty_scope = true;
-		mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
-
-		return 0;
+		ret = 0;
+		goto out_unlock;
 	}
 
+	/* Determine bus_type in order to allocate a domain */
+	ret = iommu_group_for_each_dev(iommu_group, &bus, vfio_bus_type);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out_free_group;
+
+	ret = -ENOMEM;
+	domain = kzalloc(sizeof(*domain), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!domain)
+		goto out_free_group;
+
+	ret = -EIO;
 	domain->domain = iommu_domain_alloc(bus);
-	if (!domain->domain) {
-		ret = -EIO;
-		goto out_free;
-	}
+	if (!domain->domain)
+		goto out_free_domain;
 
 	if (iommu->nesting) {
 		ret = iommu_enable_nesting(domain->domain);
@@ -2345,9 +2340,11 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
 	iommu_domain_free(domain->domain);
 	vfio_iommu_iova_free(&iova_copy);
 	vfio_iommu_resv_free(&group_resv_regions);
-out_free:
+out_free_domain:
 	kfree(domain);
+out_free_group:
 	kfree(group);
+out_unlock:
 	mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -2472,25 +2469,19 @@ static void vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group(void *iommu_data,
 	LIST_HEAD(iova_copy);
 
 	mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
+	list_for_each_entry(group, &iommu->mediated_groups, next) {
+		if (group->iommu_group != iommu_group)
+			continue;
+		update_dirty_scope = !group->pinned_page_dirty_scope;
+		list_del(&group->next);
+		kfree(group);
 
-	if (iommu->external_domain) {
-		group = find_iommu_group(iommu->external_domain, iommu_group);
-		if (group) {
-			update_dirty_scope = !group->pinned_page_dirty_scope;
-			list_del(&group->next);
-			kfree(group);
-
-			if (list_empty(&iommu->external_domain->group_list)) {
-				if (!IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu)) {
-					WARN_ON(iommu->notifier.head);
-					vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(iommu);
-				}
-
-				kfree(iommu->external_domain);
-				iommu->external_domain = NULL;
-			}
-			goto detach_group_done;
+		if (list_empty(&iommu->mediated_groups) &&
+		    !IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu)) {
+			WARN_ON(iommu->notifier.head);
+			vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(iommu);
 		}
+		goto detach_group_done;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -2518,7 +2509,7 @@ static void vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group(void *iommu_data,
 		 */
 		if (list_empty(&domain->group_list)) {
 			if (list_is_singular(&iommu->domain_list)) {
-				if (!iommu->external_domain) {
+				if (list_empty(&iommu->mediated_groups)) {
 					WARN_ON(iommu->notifier.head);
 					vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(iommu);
 				} else {
@@ -2582,41 +2573,41 @@ static void *vfio_iommu_type1_open(unsigned long arg)
 	mutex_init(&iommu->lock);
 	BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&iommu->notifier);
 	init_waitqueue_head(&iommu->vaddr_wait);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&iommu->mediated_groups);
 
 	return iommu;
 }
 
-static void vfio_release_domain(struct vfio_domain *domain, bool external)
+static void vfio_release_domain(struct vfio_domain *domain)
 {
 	struct vfio_iommu_group *group, *group_tmp;
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(group, group_tmp,
 				 &domain->group_list, next) {
-		if (!external)
-			iommu_detach_group(domain->domain, group->iommu_group);
+		iommu_detach_group(domain->domain, group->iommu_group);
 		list_del(&group->next);
 		kfree(group);
 	}
 
-	if (!external)
-		iommu_domain_free(domain->domain);
+	iommu_domain_free(domain->domain);
 }
 
 static void vfio_iommu_type1_release(void *iommu_data)
 {
 	struct vfio_iommu *iommu = iommu_data;
 	struct vfio_domain *domain, *domain_tmp;
+	struct vfio_iommu_group *group, *n;
 
-	if (iommu->external_domain) {
-		vfio_release_domain(iommu->external_domain, true);
-		kfree(iommu->external_domain);
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(group, n, &iommu->mediated_groups, next) {
+		list_del(&group->next);
+		kfree(group);
 	}
 
 	vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(iommu);
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(domain, domain_tmp,
 				 &iommu->domain_list, next) {
-		vfio_release_domain(domain, false);
+		vfio_release_domain(domain);
 		list_del(&domain->next);
 		kfree(domain);
 	}
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 14/14] vfio/iommu_type1: remove IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER
  2021-08-24 14:46 cleanup vfio iommu_group creation v2 Christoph Hellwig
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 13/14] vfio/iommu_type1: remove the "external" domain Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-24 14:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
  2021-08-25  0:38   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  13 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-08-24 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger,
	Jason Gunthorpe, kvm

IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER just obsfucated the checks being
performed, so open code it in the callers.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 13 +++++--------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
index 205f13c05b236e..42bd902243eca5 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
@@ -144,9 +144,6 @@ struct vfio_regions {
 	size_t len;
 };
 
-#define IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu)	\
-					(!list_empty(&iommu->domain_list))
-
 #define DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(n)	(ALIGN(n, BITS_PER_TYPE(u64)) / BITS_PER_BYTE)
 
 /*
@@ -884,7 +881,7 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_pin_pages(void *iommu_data,
 	 * already pinned and accounted. Accounting should be done if there is no
 	 * iommu capable domain in the container.
 	 */
-	do_accounting = !IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu);
+	do_accounting = list_empty(&iommu->domain_list);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < npage; i++) {
 		struct vfio_pfn *vpfn;
@@ -973,7 +970,7 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_unpin_pages(void *iommu_data,
 
 	mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
 
-	do_accounting = !IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu);
+	do_accounting = list_empty(&iommu->domain_list);
 	for (i = 0; i < npage; i++) {
 		struct vfio_dma *dma;
 		dma_addr_t iova;
@@ -1094,7 +1091,7 @@ static long vfio_unmap_unpin(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma,
 	if (!dma->size)
 		return 0;
 
-	if (!IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu))
+	if (list_empty(&iommu->domain_list))
 		return 0;
 
 	/*
@@ -1671,7 +1668,7 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_map(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
 	vfio_link_dma(iommu, dma);
 
 	/* Don't pin and map if container doesn't contain IOMMU capable domain*/
-	if (!IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu))
+	if (list_empty(&iommu->domain_list))
 		dma->size = size;
 	else
 		ret = vfio_pin_map_dma(iommu, dma, size);
@@ -2477,7 +2474,7 @@ static void vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group(void *iommu_data,
 		kfree(group);
 
 		if (list_empty(&iommu->mediated_groups) &&
-		    !IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu)) {
+		    list_empty(&iommu->domain_list)) {
 			WARN_ON(iommu->notifier.head);
 			vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(iommu);
 		}
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 01/14] vfio: Move vfio_iommu_group_get() to vfio_register_group_dev()
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 01/14] vfio: Move vfio_iommu_group_get() to vfio_register_group_dev() Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-24 20:25   ` Alex Williamson
  2021-08-24 22:50     ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2021-08-25 12:43     ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 50+ messages in thread
From: Alex Williamson @ 2021-08-24 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger,
	Jason Gunthorpe, kvm, Jason Gunthorpe

On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 16:46:36 +0200
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:

> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> 
> We don't need to hold a reference to the group in the driver as well as
> obtain a reference to the same group as the first thing
> vfio_register_group_dev() does.
> 
> Since the drivers never use the group move this all into the core code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c            | 17 ++-----------
>  drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c                  | 15 ++----------
>  drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c | 13 +---------
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.c                          | 25 ++++++--------------
>  include/linux/vfio.h                         |  3 ---
>  5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> index a4f44ea52fa324..b01c1c6cf1f5e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> @@ -1875,7 +1875,6 @@ static void vfio_pci_vga_uninit(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev)
>  static int vfio_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>  {
>  	struct vfio_pci_device *vdev;
> -	struct iommu_group *group;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	if (vfio_pci_is_denylisted(pdev))
> @@ -1897,15 +1896,9 @@ static int vfio_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>  		return -EBUSY;
>  	}
>  
> -	group = vfio_iommu_group_get(&pdev->dev);
> -	if (!group)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	vdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*vdev), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!vdev) {
> -		ret = -ENOMEM;
> -		goto out_group_put;
> -	}
> +	if (!vdev)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	vfio_init_group_dev(&vdev->vdev, &pdev->dev, &vfio_pci_ops);
>  	vdev->pdev = pdev;
> @@ -1971,8 +1964,6 @@ static int vfio_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>  	vfio_uninit_group_dev(&vdev->vdev);
>  	kfree(vdev->pm_save);
>  	kfree(vdev);
> -out_group_put:
> -	vfio_iommu_group_put(group, &pdev->dev);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1988,8 +1979,6 @@ static void vfio_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	vfio_uninit_group_dev(&vdev->vdev);
>  	vfio_pci_vga_uninit(vdev);
>  
> -	vfio_iommu_group_put(pdev->dev.iommu_group, &pdev->dev);
> -
>  	if (!disable_idle_d3)
>  		vfio_pci_set_power_state(vdev, PCI_D0);
>  


I think this turns into the patch below on top of Yishai's
vfio-pci-core series.  Please verify.  If you'd like something
different, please post an update.  Thanks,

Alex

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
index c67751948504..4134dceab3f7 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c
@@ -1807,7 +1807,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_pci_core_uninit_device);
 int vfio_pci_core_register_device(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
 {
 	struct pci_dev *pdev = vdev->pdev;
-	struct iommu_group *group;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (pdev->hdr_type != PCI_HEADER_TYPE_NORMAL)
@@ -1826,10 +1825,6 @@ int vfio_pci_core_register_device(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
 		return -EBUSY;
 	}
 
-	group = vfio_iommu_group_get(&pdev->dev);
-	if (!group)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	if (pci_is_root_bus(pdev->bus)) {
 		ret = vfio_assign_device_set(&vdev->vdev, vdev);
 	} else if (!pci_probe_reset_slot(pdev->slot)) {
@@ -1843,10 +1838,10 @@ int vfio_pci_core_register_device(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
 	}
 
 	if (ret)
-		goto out_group_put;
+		return ret;
 	ret = vfio_pci_vf_init(vdev);
 	if (ret)
-		goto out_group_put;
+		return ret;
 	ret = vfio_pci_vga_init(vdev);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out_vf;
@@ -1877,8 +1872,6 @@ int vfio_pci_core_register_device(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
 		vfio_pci_set_power_state(vdev, PCI_D0);
 out_vf:
 	vfio_pci_vf_uninit(vdev);
-out_group_put:
-	vfio_iommu_group_put(group, &pdev->dev);
 	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_pci_core_register_device);
@@ -1894,8 +1887,6 @@ void vfio_pci_core_unregister_device(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev)
 	vfio_pci_vf_uninit(vdev);
 	vfio_pci_vga_uninit(vdev);
 
-	vfio_iommu_group_put(pdev->dev.iommu_group, &pdev->dev);
-
 	if (!disable_idle_d3)
 		vfio_pci_set_power_state(vdev, PCI_D0);
 }


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 01/14] vfio: Move vfio_iommu_group_get() to vfio_register_group_dev()
  2021-08-24 20:25   ` Alex Williamson
@ 2021-08-24 22:50     ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2021-08-25 12:43     ` Christoph Hellwig
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2021-08-24 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede,
	Eric Auger, kvm

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 02:25:08PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > @@ -1988,8 +1979,6 @@ static void vfio_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >  	vfio_uninit_group_dev(&vdev->vdev);
> >  	vfio_pci_vga_uninit(vdev);
> >  
> > -	vfio_iommu_group_put(pdev->dev.iommu_group, &pdev->dev);
> > -
> >  	if (!disable_idle_d3)
> >  		vfio_pci_set_power_state(vdev, PCI_D0);
> >  
> 
> 
> I think this turns into the patch below on top of Yishai's
> vfio-pci-core series.  Please verify.  If you'd like something
> different, please post an update.  Thanks,

It appears correct to me, thanks

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 02/14] vfio: factor out a vfio_iommu_driver_allowed helper
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 02/14] vfio: factor out a vfio_iommu_driver_allowed helper Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-24 23:24   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2021-08-24 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: Alex Williamson, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede,
	Eric Auger, kvm

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 04:46:37PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Factor out a little helper to make the checks for the noiommu driver less
> ugly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 03/14] vfio: remove the iommudata check in vfio_noiommu_attach_group
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 03/14] vfio: remove the iommudata check in vfio_noiommu_attach_group Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-24 23:31   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2021-08-24 23:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: Alex Williamson, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede,
	Eric Auger, kvm

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 04:46:38PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> vfio_noiommu_attach_group has two callers:
> 
>  1) __vfio_container_attach_groups is called by vfio_ioctl_set_iommu,
>     which just called vfio_iommu_driver_allowed
>  2) vfio_group_set_container requires already checks ->noiommu on the
>     vfio_group, which is propagated from the iommudata in
>     vfio_create_group
> 
> so this check is entirely superflous and can be removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 04/14] vfio: factor out a vfio_group_find_or_alloc helper
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 04/14] vfio: factor out a vfio_group_find_or_alloc helper Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-24 23:40   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2021-08-25  5:30     ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2021-08-24 23:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: Alex Williamson, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede,
	Eric Auger, kvm

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 04:46:39PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Factor out a helper to find or allocate the vfio_group to reduce the
> spagetthi code in vfio_register_group_dev a little.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
> index 00aeef5bb29abd..9e97ad36a1c052 100644
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
> @@ -833,10 +833,32 @@ void vfio_uninit_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_uninit_group_dev);
>  
> +struct vfio_group *vfio_group_find_or_alloc(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct iommu_group *iommu_group;
> +	struct vfio_group *group;
> +
> +	iommu_group = vfio_iommu_group_get(dev);
> +	if (!iommu_group)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * A found vfio_group already holds a reference to the iommu_group.
> +	 * A created vfio_group keeps the reference.
> +	 */
> +	group = vfio_group_get_from_iommu(iommu_group);
> +	if (!group) {
> +		group = vfio_create_group(iommu_group);
> +		if (!IS_ERR(group))
> +			return group;
> +	}
> +	vfio_iommu_group_put(iommu_group, dev);
> +	return group;

I think the non-"success oriented flow" is less readable than what was
before. It is jarring to see, and I was about to say this is not
logically the same having missed the !...

How about:

        /* If found group already holds the iommu_group reference */
	group = vfio_group_get_from_iommu(iommu_group);
	if (group)
            goto out_put;

	group = vfio_create_group(iommu_group);
	if (IS_ERR(group))
	     goto out_put;
        /* If created our iommu_group reference was moved to group, keep it */
	return group;

out_put:
	vfio_iommu_group_put(iommu_group, dev);
	return group;

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 05/14] vfio: refactor noiommu group creation
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 05/14] vfio: refactor noiommu group creation Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-24 23:43   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2021-08-24 23:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: Alex Williamson, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede,
	Eric Auger, kvm

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 04:46:40PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Split the actual noiommu group creation from vfio_iommu_group_get into a
> new helper, and open code the rest of vfio_iommu_group_get in its only
> caller.  This creates an antirely separate and clear code path for the
> noiommu group creation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 06/14] vfio: remove the iommudata hack for noiommu groups
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 06/14] vfio: remove the iommudata hack for noiommu groups Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-24 23:45   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2021-08-24 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: Alex Williamson, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede,
	Eric Auger, kvm

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 04:46:41PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Just pass a noiommu argument to vfio_create_group and set up the
> ->noiommu flag directly, and remove the now superflous
> vfio_iommu_group_put helper.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.c | 30 +++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

I like this a lot better

Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 07/14] vfio: simplify iommu group allocation for mediated devices
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 07/14] vfio: simplify iommu group allocation for mediated devices Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-25  0:19   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2021-08-25  5:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2021-08-25  0:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: Alex Williamson, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede,
	Eric Auger, kvm

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 04:46:42PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> +int vfio_register_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
> +{
> +	return __vfio_register_dev(device,
> +		vfio_group_find_or_alloc(device->dev));
> +}
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_register_group_dev);
>  
> +int vfio_register_mediated_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
> +{
> +	return __vfio_register_dev(device,
> +		vfio_noiommu_group_alloc(device->dev, VFIO_MEDIATED));
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_register_mediated_dev);

The mechanism looks fine, but I think the core code is much clearer if
the name is not 'mediated' but 'sw_iommu' or something that implies
the group is running with a software page table. mediated has become
so overloaded in this code.

Really what this flag is doing is putting the group into a state where
the vfio_*pin_pages APIs are available once the vfio_device is opened.

So it really becomes an API family where a driver will call
vfio_regsiter_sw_iommu_dev(), then use the vfio_pin/unpin_pages API
set.

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 08/14] vfio: remove unused method from vfio_iommu_driver_ops
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 08/14] vfio: remove unused method from vfio_iommu_driver_ops Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-25  0:21   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2021-08-25  0:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: Alex Williamson, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede,
	Eric Auger, kvm

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 04:46:43PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The read, write and mmap methods are never implemented, so remove them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.c  | 50 --------------------------------------------
>  include/linux/vfio.h |  5 -----
>  2 files changed, 55 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 09/14] vfio: move the vfio_iommu_driver_ops interface out of <linux/vfio.h>
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 09/14] vfio: move the vfio_iommu_driver_ops interface out of <linux/vfio.h> Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-25  0:25   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2021-08-25  0:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: Alex Williamson, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede,
	Eric Auger, kvm

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 04:46:44PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Create a new private drivers/vfio/vfio.h header for the interface between
> the VFIO core and the iommu drivers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.c                 |  1 +
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.h                 | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c |  1 +
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c     |  1 +
>  include/linux/vfio.h                | 44 ---------------------------
>  5 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/vfio/vfio.h

Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 10/14] vfio: remove the unused mdev iommu hook
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 10/14] vfio: remove the unused mdev iommu hook Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-25  0:25   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2021-08-25  0:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: Alex Williamson, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede,
	Eric Auger, kvm

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 04:46:45PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The iommu_device field in struct mdev_device has never been used
> since it was added more than 2 years ago.
> 
> This is a manual revert of commit 7bd50f0cd2
> ("vfio/type1: Add domain at(de)taching group helpers").
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 133 +++++++-------------------------
>  include/linux/mdev.h            |  20 -----
>  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)

Right, this was for the imagined PASID support that looks like it is
going in a different direction..

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 11/14] vfio: clean up the check for mediated device in vfio_iommu_type1
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 11/14] vfio: clean up the check for mediated device in vfio_iommu_type1 Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-25  0:28   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2021-08-25  5:34     ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2021-08-25  0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: Alex Williamson, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede,
	Eric Auger, kvm

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 04:46:46PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Pass the group flags to ->attach_group and remove the messy check for
> the bus type.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.c                 | 11 +++++------
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.h                 |  7 ++++++-
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c |  2 +-
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c     | 19 ++-----------------
>  4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

Every caller is doing group->iommu_group, maybe change the signature
to

 (*attach_group)(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_iommu_group *group)
 
?

Then the flags don't need to be another arg, just group->flags

Happy to see the symbol_get removed!

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 12/14] vfio/spapr_tce: reject mediated devices
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 12/14] vfio/spapr_tce: reject mediated devices Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-25  0:29   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2021-08-25  0:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: Alex Williamson, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede,
	Eric Auger, kvm

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 04:46:47PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Unlike the the type1 IOMMU backend, the SPAPR one does not contain any
> support for the magic non-IOMMU backed iommu_group used by mediated
> devices, so reject them in ->attach_group.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 13/14] vfio/iommu_type1: remove the "external" domain
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 13/14] vfio/iommu_type1: remove the "external" domain Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-25  0:36   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2021-08-25  5:35     ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2021-08-25  0:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: Alex Williamson, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede,
	Eric Auger, kvm

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 04:46:48PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The external_domain concept rather misleading and not actually needed.
> Replace it with a list of mediated groups in struct vfio_iommu and
> document the purpose.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 123 +++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

> +	/*
> +	 * Tracks the fake iommu groups created by vfio to support mediated
> +	 * devices.  These are not backed by an actual IOMMU.
> +	 */
> +	struct list_head	mediated_groups;

Though again I'd prefer another name to mediated here.. These are
domainless groups?

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 14/14] vfio/iommu_type1: remove IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER
  2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 14/14] vfio/iommu_type1: remove IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-25  0:38   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2021-08-25  0:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: Alex Williamson, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede,
	Eric Auger, kvm

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 04:46:49PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER just obsfucated the checks being
> performed, so open code it in the callers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 13 +++++--------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 04/14] vfio: factor out a vfio_group_find_or_alloc helper
  2021-08-24 23:40   ` Jason Gunthorpe
@ 2021-08-25  5:30     ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-08-25  5:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason Gunthorpe
  Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Alex Williamson, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck,
	Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger, kvm

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 08:40:50PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> I think the non-"success oriented flow" is less readable than what was
> before. It is jarring to see, and I was about to say this is not
> logically the same having missed the !...
> 
> How about:
> 
>         /* If found group already holds the iommu_group reference */
> 	group = vfio_group_get_from_iommu(iommu_group);
> 	if (group)
>             goto out_put;
> 
> 	group = vfio_create_group(iommu_group);
> 	if (IS_ERR(group))
> 	     goto out_put;
>         /* If created our iommu_group reference was moved to group, keep it */
> 	return group;
> 
> out_put:
> 	vfio_iommu_group_put(iommu_group, dev);
> 	return group;

Fine with me.  I actually repeatedly switched between the two flows
because I couldn't decide on one.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 07/14] vfio: simplify iommu group allocation for mediated devices
  2021-08-25  0:19   ` Jason Gunthorpe
@ 2021-08-25  5:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
  2021-08-25 12:21       ` Jason Gunthorpe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-08-25  5:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason Gunthorpe
  Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Alex Williamson, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck,
	Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger, kvm

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 09:19:16PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> The mechanism looks fine, but I think the core code is much clearer if
> the name is not 'mediated' but 'sw_iommu' or something that implies
> the group is running with a software page table. mediated has become
> so overloaded in this code.

I thought that was sort of the definition of mediated - there needs to
ben entify that "mediates" access so that a user of this interface
can't trigger undmediated DMA to arbitrary addresses.  My other choice
that I used for a while was "virtual".  sw_iommu sounds a little clumsy.

I guess either way we need some documentation describing it along the
above lines.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 11/14] vfio: clean up the check for mediated device in vfio_iommu_type1
  2021-08-25  0:28   ` Jason Gunthorpe
@ 2021-08-25  5:34     ` Christoph Hellwig
  2021-08-25 12:35       ` Jason Gunthorpe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-08-25  5:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason Gunthorpe
  Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Alex Williamson, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck,
	Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger, kvm

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 09:28:50PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 04:46:46PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Pass the group flags to ->attach_group and remove the messy check for
> > the bus type.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > ---
> >  drivers/vfio/vfio.c                 | 11 +++++------
> >  drivers/vfio/vfio.h                 |  7 ++++++-
> >  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c |  2 +-
> >  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c     | 19 ++-----------------
> >  4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> Every caller is doing group->iommu_group, maybe change the signature
> to
> 
>  (*attach_group)(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_iommu_group *group)
>  
> ?

s/vfio_iommu/vfio_container/, but yes.  I actually have a series that
does this (also for a few other methods), but this requires exposing
vfio_container and vfio_iommu_group outside of vfio.c.  Given that this
series is big enough I decided to skip it for now, but that plus a few
other changes will eventually simplify the group lookups in
vfio_iommu_type1.c.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 13/14] vfio/iommu_type1: remove the "external" domain
  2021-08-25  0:36   ` Jason Gunthorpe
@ 2021-08-25  5:35     ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-08-25  5:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason Gunthorpe
  Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Alex Williamson, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck,
	Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger, kvm

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 09:36:29PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Tracks the fake iommu groups created by vfio to support mediated
> > +	 * devices.  These are not backed by an actual IOMMU.
> > +	 */
> > +	struct list_head	mediated_groups;
> 
> Though again I'd prefer another name to mediated here.. These are
> domainless groups?

I think they should use whatever named we use for/instead of the mediated
groups as these are the same concept.  Using an unrelated name like
external did causes major confusion.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 07/14] vfio: simplify iommu group allocation for mediated devices
  2021-08-25  5:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-25 12:21       ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2021-08-25 12:24         ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2021-08-25 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: Alex Williamson, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede,
	Eric Auger, kvm

On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 07:32:37AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 09:19:16PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > The mechanism looks fine, but I think the core code is much clearer if
> > the name is not 'mediated' but 'sw_iommu' or something that implies
> > the group is running with a software page table. mediated has become
> > so overloaded in this code.
> 
> I thought that was sort of the definition of mediated - there needs to
> ben entify that "mediates" access so that a user of this interface
> can't trigger undmediated DMA to arbitrary addresses.  My other choice
> that I used for a while was "virtual".  sw_iommu sounds a little clumsy.

vfio mediated is really some toolbox of different features that a
driver can use to build what it wants.

For instance Intel is looking at this concept of a mediated device
that uses PASID for the IOMMU. It would have a real IOMMU, use real
IOMMU page tables and in this language it would create some PASID
group, not a "sw_iommu" group.

This feature is about creating a device that is not connected to a HW
IO page table (at least by the VFIO iommu code) but the IO page table
is held in software and accessed by the VFIO driver through the pin
API.

virtual_iommu is somewhat overloaded with the idea of a vIOMMU created
by qemu and stuffed into a guest..

"domainless" might work but I also find it confusing that the iommu
code uses the word domain to refer to a HW IO page table :\

Maybe "sw io page table" ?

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 07/14] vfio: simplify iommu group allocation for mediated devices
  2021-08-25 12:21       ` Jason Gunthorpe
@ 2021-08-25 12:24         ` Christoph Hellwig
  2021-08-25 12:34           ` Jason Gunthorpe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-08-25 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason Gunthorpe
  Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Alex Williamson, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck,
	Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger, kvm

On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 09:21:44AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> This feature is about creating a device that is not connected to a HW
> IO page table (at least by the VFIO iommu code) but the IO page table
> is held in software and accessed by the VFIO driver through the pin
> API.
> 
> virtual_iommu is somewhat overloaded with the idea of a vIOMMU created
> by qemu and stuffed into a guest..
> 
> "domainless" might work but I also find it confusing that the iommu
> code uses the word domain to refer to a HW IO page table :\
> 
> Maybe "sw io page table" ?

Or simply emulated?  At least looking at i915 there is very little
direct connection to the actual hardware, and while I don't understand
them fully the s390 driver look similar.  And the samples are completely
faked up anyway.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 07/14] vfio: simplify iommu group allocation for mediated devices
  2021-08-25 12:24         ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-25 12:34           ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2021-08-25 12:37             ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2021-08-25 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: Alex Williamson, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede,
	Eric Auger, kvm

On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 02:24:00PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 09:21:44AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > This feature is about creating a device that is not connected to a HW
> > IO page table (at least by the VFIO iommu code) but the IO page table
> > is held in software and accessed by the VFIO driver through the pin
> > API.
> > 
> > virtual_iommu is somewhat overloaded with the idea of a vIOMMU created
> > by qemu and stuffed into a guest..
> > 
> > "domainless" might work but I also find it confusing that the iommu
> > code uses the word domain to refer to a HW IO page table :\
> > 
> > Maybe "sw io page table" ?
> 
> Or simply emulated?  At least looking at i915 there is very little
> direct connection to the actual hardware, and while I don't understand
> them fully the s390 driver look similar.  And the samples are completely
> faked up anyway.

Emulated IO page table works for me!

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 11/14] vfio: clean up the check for mediated device in vfio_iommu_type1
  2021-08-25  5:34     ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-25 12:35       ` Jason Gunthorpe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2021-08-25 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: Alex Williamson, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede,
	Eric Auger, kvm

On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 07:34:27AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 09:28:50PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 04:46:46PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Pass the group flags to ->attach_group and remove the messy check for
> > > the bus type.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > >  drivers/vfio/vfio.c                 | 11 +++++------
> > >  drivers/vfio/vfio.h                 |  7 ++++++-
> > >  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c |  2 +-
> > >  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c     | 19 ++-----------------
> > >  4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Every caller is doing group->iommu_group, maybe change the signature
> > to
> > 
> >  (*attach_group)(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_iommu_group *group)
> >  
> > ?
> 
> s/vfio_iommu/vfio_container/, but yes.  I actually have a series that
> does this (also for a few other methods), but this requires exposing
> vfio_container and vfio_iommu_group outside of vfio.c.  Given that this
> series is big enough I decided to skip it for now, but that plus a few
> other changes will eventually simplify the group lookups in
> vfio_iommu_type1.c.

Fair enough

Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 07/14] vfio: simplify iommu group allocation for mediated devices
  2021-08-25 12:34           ` Jason Gunthorpe
@ 2021-08-25 12:37             ` Christoph Hellwig
  2021-08-25 12:45               ` Jason Gunthorpe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-08-25 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason Gunthorpe
  Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Alex Williamson, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck,
	Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger, kvm

On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 09:34:54AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 02:24:00PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 09:21:44AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > This feature is about creating a device that is not connected to a HW
> > > IO page table (at least by the VFIO iommu code) but the IO page table
> > > is held in software and accessed by the VFIO driver through the pin
> > > API.
> > > 
> > > virtual_iommu is somewhat overloaded with the idea of a vIOMMU created
> > > by qemu and stuffed into a guest..
> > > 
> > > "domainless" might work but I also find it confusing that the iommu
> > > code uses the word domain to refer to a HW IO page table :\
> > > 
> > > Maybe "sw io page table" ?
> > 
> > Or simply emulated?  At least looking at i915 there is very little
> > direct connection to the actual hardware, and while I don't understand
> > them fully the s390 driver look similar.  And the samples are completely
> > faked up anyway.
> 
> Emulated IO page table works for me!

Hmm, that is a full sentence for the comment that needs to be added.
Are you fine with just s/mediated/emulated/ for the symbol names or
do you want something more specific?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 01/14] vfio: Move vfio_iommu_group_get() to vfio_register_group_dev()
  2021-08-24 20:25   ` Alex Williamson
  2021-08-24 22:50     ` Jason Gunthorpe
@ 2021-08-25 12:43     ` Christoph Hellwig
  2021-08-25 15:48       ` Alex Williamson
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-08-25 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede,
	Eric Auger, Jason Gunthorpe, kvm, Jason Gunthorpe

On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 02:25:08PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> I think this turns into the patch below on top of Yishai's
> vfio-pci-core series.  Please verify.  If you'd like something
> different, please post an update.  Thanks,

The change looks fine to me.  Does that mean you want me to rebase
on top of the above series?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 07/14] vfio: simplify iommu group allocation for mediated devices
  2021-08-25 12:37             ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-25 12:45               ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2021-08-25 12:50                 ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2021-08-25 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: Alex Williamson, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede,
	Eric Auger, kvm

On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 02:37:42PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 09:34:54AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 02:24:00PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 09:21:44AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > This feature is about creating a device that is not connected to a HW
> > > > IO page table (at least by the VFIO iommu code) but the IO page table
> > > > is held in software and accessed by the VFIO driver through the pin
> > > > API.
> > > > 
> > > > virtual_iommu is somewhat overloaded with the idea of a vIOMMU created
> > > > by qemu and stuffed into a guest..
> > > > 
> > > > "domainless" might work but I also find it confusing that the iommu
> > > > code uses the word domain to refer to a HW IO page table :\
> > > > 
> > > > Maybe "sw io page table" ?
> > > 
> > > Or simply emulated?  At least looking at i915 there is very little
> > > direct connection to the actual hardware, and while I don't understand
> > > them fully the s390 driver look similar.  And the samples are completely
> > > faked up anyway.
> > 
> > Emulated IO page table works for me!
> 
> Hmm, that is a full sentence for the comment that needs to be added.
> Are you fine with just s/mediated/emulated/ for the symbol names or
> do you want something more specific?

I think so, in context of a group or iommu function it kind of makes
sense emulated would refer to the page table/dma process

The driver entry point can have the extra words
 vfio_register_emulated_dma_dev()

Seems to read well?

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 07/14] vfio: simplify iommu group allocation for mediated devices
  2021-08-25 12:45               ` Jason Gunthorpe
@ 2021-08-25 12:50                 ` Christoph Hellwig
  2021-08-25 12:50                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-08-25 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason Gunthorpe
  Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Alex Williamson, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck,
	Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger, kvm

On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 09:45:38AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> I think so, in context of a group or iommu function it kind of makes
> sense emulated would refer to the page table/dma process
> 
> The driver entry point can have the extra words
>  vfio_register_emulated_dma_dev()

Not my preference, but I could live with it.  Or maybe emulated_iommu?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 07/14] vfio: simplify iommu group allocation for mediated devices
  2021-08-25 12:50                 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-25 12:50                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2021-08-25 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: Alex Williamson, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede,
	Eric Auger, kvm

On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 02:50:22PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 09:45:38AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > I think so, in context of a group or iommu function it kind of makes
> > sense emulated would refer to the page table/dma process
> > 
> > The driver entry point can have the extra words
> >  vfio_register_emulated_dma_dev()
> 
> Not my preference, but I could live with it.  Or maybe emulated_iommu?

Sure

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 01/14] vfio: Move vfio_iommu_group_get() to vfio_register_group_dev()
  2021-08-25 12:43     ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-25 15:48       ` Alex Williamson
  2021-08-25 16:08         ` Jason Gunthorpe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Alex Williamson @ 2021-08-25 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger,
	Jason Gunthorpe, kvm, Jason Gunthorpe, Max Gurtovoy,
	Yishai Hadas

On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 14:43:03 +0200
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 02:25:08PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > I think this turns into the patch below on top of Yishai's
> > vfio-pci-core series.  Please verify.  If you'd like something
> > different, please post an update.  Thanks,  
> 
> The change looks fine to me.  Does that mean you want me to rebase
> on top of the above series?

I wish the answer here was more obvious, but we're still waiting for
PCI and scripts/mod/ acks for that series.  I note however that while
the functionality of other driver's having a userspace driver discovery
mechanism hinges on patches 9 & 10 of Yishai's series, those patches
can also be cleanly moved to the end of the series, or a follow-on
series if necessary, and current vfio-pci binding continues to work.

Should we go ahead and get final reviews for {1-8,11-13} of Yishai's
series to get them in my next branch so we have a consistent base to
work from?  Thanks,

Alex


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 01/14] vfio: Move vfio_iommu_group_get() to vfio_register_group_dev()
  2021-08-25 15:48       ` Alex Williamson
@ 2021-08-25 16:08         ` Jason Gunthorpe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2021-08-25 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede,
	Eric Auger, kvm, Max Gurtovoy, Yishai Hadas

On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 09:48:19AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 14:43:03 +0200
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 02:25:08PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > I think this turns into the patch below on top of Yishai's
> > > vfio-pci-core series.  Please verify.  If you'd like something
> > > different, please post an update.  Thanks,  
> > 
> > The change looks fine to me.  Does that mean you want me to rebase
> > on top of the above series?
> 
> I wish the answer here was more obvious, but we're still waiting for
> PCI and scripts/mod/ acks for that series.  I note however that while
> the functionality of other driver's having a userspace driver discovery
> mechanism hinges on patches 9 & 10 of Yishai's series, those patches
> can also be cleanly moved to the end of the series, or a follow-on
> series if necessary, and current vfio-pci binding continues to work.
> 
> Should we go ahead and get final reviews for {1-8,11-13} of Yishai's
> series to get them in my next branch so we have a consistent base to
> work from?  Thanks,

I see Bjorn has just now ack'd the PCI parts so I think it is also
fine to go ahead. A subsystem is ultimately responsible to define the
modalias format under its bus, the file2alias changes are supposed to
track it.

Also I'm looking at past changes to file2alias and I don't really see
many acks..

Thanks,
Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 14/14] vfio/iommu_type1: remove IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER
  2021-09-13  7:15 cleanup vfio iommu_group creation v5 Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-09-13  7:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-09-13  7:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger,
	Jason Gunthorpe, Terrence Xu, kvm, Jason Gunthorpe, Kevin Tian

IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER just obsfucated the checks being
performed, so open code it in the callers.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 13 +++++--------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
index d2db62cb2aaa39..7ad56afb11750e 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
@@ -139,9 +139,6 @@ struct vfio_regions {
 	size_t len;
 };
 
-#define IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu)	\
-					(!list_empty(&iommu->domain_list))
-
 #define DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(n)	(ALIGN(n, BITS_PER_TYPE(u64)) / BITS_PER_BYTE)
 
 /*
@@ -879,7 +876,7 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_pin_pages(void *iommu_data,
 	 * already pinned and accounted. Accounting should be done if there is no
 	 * iommu capable domain in the container.
 	 */
-	do_accounting = !IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu);
+	do_accounting = list_empty(&iommu->domain_list);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < npage; i++) {
 		struct vfio_pfn *vpfn;
@@ -968,7 +965,7 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_unpin_pages(void *iommu_data,
 
 	mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
 
-	do_accounting = !IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu);
+	do_accounting = list_empty(&iommu->domain_list);
 	for (i = 0; i < npage; i++) {
 		struct vfio_dma *dma;
 		dma_addr_t iova;
@@ -1089,7 +1086,7 @@ static long vfio_unmap_unpin(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma,
 	if (!dma->size)
 		return 0;
 
-	if (!IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu))
+	if (list_empty(&iommu->domain_list))
 		return 0;
 
 	/*
@@ -1666,7 +1663,7 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_map(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
 	vfio_link_dma(iommu, dma);
 
 	/* Don't pin and map if container doesn't contain IOMMU capable domain*/
-	if (!IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu))
+	if (list_empty(&iommu->domain_list))
 		dma->size = size;
 	else
 		ret = vfio_pin_map_dma(iommu, dma, size);
@@ -2472,7 +2469,7 @@ static void vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group(void *iommu_data,
 		kfree(group);
 
 		if (list_empty(&iommu->emulated_iommu_groups) &&
-		    !IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu)) {
+		    list_empty(&iommu->domain_list)) {
 			WARN_ON(iommu->notifier.head);
 			vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(iommu);
 		}
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 14/14] vfio/iommu_type1: remove IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER
  2021-08-26 13:34 cleanup vfio iommu_group creation v4 Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-26 13:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-08-26 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger,
	Jason Gunthorpe, kvm, Jason Gunthorpe, Kevin Tian

IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER just obsfucated the checks being
performed, so open code it in the callers.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 13 +++++--------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
index 1ef98d4e2abecf..94441e6c0983be 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
@@ -139,9 +139,6 @@ struct vfio_regions {
 	size_t len;
 };
 
-#define IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu)	\
-					(!list_empty(&iommu->domain_list))
-
 #define DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(n)	(ALIGN(n, BITS_PER_TYPE(u64)) / BITS_PER_BYTE)
 
 /*
@@ -879,7 +876,7 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_pin_pages(void *iommu_data,
 	 * already pinned and accounted. Accounting should be done if there is no
 	 * iommu capable domain in the container.
 	 */
-	do_accounting = !IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu);
+	do_accounting = list_empty(&iommu->domain_list);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < npage; i++) {
 		struct vfio_pfn *vpfn;
@@ -968,7 +965,7 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_unpin_pages(void *iommu_data,
 
 	mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
 
-	do_accounting = !IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu);
+	do_accounting = list_empty(&iommu->domain_list);
 	for (i = 0; i < npage; i++) {
 		struct vfio_dma *dma;
 		dma_addr_t iova;
@@ -1089,7 +1086,7 @@ static long vfio_unmap_unpin(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma,
 	if (!dma->size)
 		return 0;
 
-	if (!IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu))
+	if (list_empty(&iommu->domain_list))
 		return 0;
 
 	/*
@@ -1666,7 +1663,7 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_map(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
 	vfio_link_dma(iommu, dma);
 
 	/* Don't pin and map if container doesn't contain IOMMU capable domain*/
-	if (!IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu))
+	if (list_empty(&iommu->domain_list))
 		dma->size = size;
 	else
 		ret = vfio_pin_map_dma(iommu, dma, size);
@@ -2472,7 +2469,7 @@ static void vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group(void *iommu_data,
 		kfree(group);
 
 		if (list_empty(&iommu->emulated_iommu_groups) &&
-		    !IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu)) {
+		    list_empty(&iommu->domain_list)) {
 			WARN_ON(iommu->notifier.head);
 			vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(iommu);
 		}
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH 14/14] vfio/iommu_type1: remove IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER
  2021-08-25 16:19 ` [PATCH 14/14] vfio/iommu_type1: remove IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-26  4:32   ` Tian, Kevin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread
From: Tian, Kevin @ 2021-08-26  4:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig, Alex Williamson
  Cc: Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger,
	Jason Gunthorpe, kvm, Jason Gunthorpe

> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2021 12:19 AM
> 
> IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER just obsfucated the checks being
> performed, so open code it in the callers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 13 +++++--------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index 871cd2867999cb..7ecf5ca01764a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -140,9 +140,6 @@ struct vfio_regions {
>  	size_t len;
>  };
> 
> -#define IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu)	\
> -					(!list_empty(&iommu->domain_list))
> -
>  #define DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(n)	(ALIGN(n, BITS_PER_TYPE(u64)) /
> BITS_PER_BYTE)
> 
>  /*
> @@ -880,7 +877,7 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_pin_pages(void
> *iommu_data,
>  	 * already pinned and accounted. Accounting should be done if there
> is no
>  	 * iommu capable domain in the container.
>  	 */
> -	do_accounting = !IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu);
> +	do_accounting = list_empty(&iommu->domain_list);
> 
>  	for (i = 0; i < npage; i++) {
>  		struct vfio_pfn *vpfn;
> @@ -969,7 +966,7 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_unpin_pages(void
> *iommu_data,
> 
>  	mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> 
> -	do_accounting = !IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu);
> +	do_accounting = list_empty(&iommu->domain_list);
>  	for (i = 0; i < npage; i++) {
>  		struct vfio_dma *dma;
>  		dma_addr_t iova;
> @@ -1090,7 +1087,7 @@ static long vfio_unmap_unpin(struct vfio_iommu
> *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma,
>  	if (!dma->size)
>  		return 0;
> 
> -	if (!IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu))
> +	if (list_empty(&iommu->domain_list))
>  		return 0;
> 
>  	/*
> @@ -1667,7 +1664,7 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_map(struct vfio_iommu
> *iommu,
>  	vfio_link_dma(iommu, dma);
> 
>  	/* Don't pin and map if container doesn't contain IOMMU capable
> domain*/
> -	if (!IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu))
> +	if (list_empty(&iommu->domain_list))
>  		dma->size = size;
>  	else
>  		ret = vfio_pin_map_dma(iommu, dma, size);
> @@ -2473,7 +2470,7 @@ static void vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group(void
> *iommu_data,
>  		kfree(group);
> 
>  		if (list_empty(&iommu->emulated_iommu_groups) &&
> -		    !IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu)) {
> +		    list_empty(&iommu->domain_list)) {
>  			WARN_ON(iommu->notifier.head);
>  			vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(iommu);
>  		}
> --
> 2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 14/14] vfio/iommu_type1: remove IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER
  2021-08-25 16:19 cleanup vfio iommu_group creation v3 Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-25 16:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
  2021-08-26  4:32   ` Tian, Kevin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 50+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-08-25 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger,
	Jason Gunthorpe, kvm, Jason Gunthorpe

IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER just obsfucated the checks being
performed, so open code it in the callers.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 13 +++++--------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
index 871cd2867999cb..7ecf5ca01764a5 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
@@ -140,9 +140,6 @@ struct vfio_regions {
 	size_t len;
 };
 
-#define IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu)	\
-					(!list_empty(&iommu->domain_list))
-
 #define DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(n)	(ALIGN(n, BITS_PER_TYPE(u64)) / BITS_PER_BYTE)
 
 /*
@@ -880,7 +877,7 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_pin_pages(void *iommu_data,
 	 * already pinned and accounted. Accounting should be done if there is no
 	 * iommu capable domain in the container.
 	 */
-	do_accounting = !IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu);
+	do_accounting = list_empty(&iommu->domain_list);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < npage; i++) {
 		struct vfio_pfn *vpfn;
@@ -969,7 +966,7 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_unpin_pages(void *iommu_data,
 
 	mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
 
-	do_accounting = !IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu);
+	do_accounting = list_empty(&iommu->domain_list);
 	for (i = 0; i < npage; i++) {
 		struct vfio_dma *dma;
 		dma_addr_t iova;
@@ -1090,7 +1087,7 @@ static long vfio_unmap_unpin(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma,
 	if (!dma->size)
 		return 0;
 
-	if (!IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu))
+	if (list_empty(&iommu->domain_list))
 		return 0;
 
 	/*
@@ -1667,7 +1664,7 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_map(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
 	vfio_link_dma(iommu, dma);
 
 	/* Don't pin and map if container doesn't contain IOMMU capable domain*/
-	if (!IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu))
+	if (list_empty(&iommu->domain_list))
 		dma->size = size;
 	else
 		ret = vfio_pin_map_dma(iommu, dma, size);
@@ -2473,7 +2470,7 @@ static void vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group(void *iommu_data,
 		kfree(group);
 
 		if (list_empty(&iommu->emulated_iommu_groups) &&
-		    !IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu)) {
+		    list_empty(&iommu->domain_list)) {
 			WARN_ON(iommu->notifier.head);
 			vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(iommu);
 		}
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 14/14] vfio/iommu_type1: remove IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER
  2021-08-11 15:14 cleanup vfio iommu_group creation Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-08-11 15:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 50+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-08-11 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Williamson
  Cc: Diana Craciun, Cornelia Huck, Kirti Wankhede, Eric Auger,
	Jason Gunthorpe, kvm

IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER just obsfucated the checks being
performed, so open code it in the callers.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 13 +++++--------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
index 205f13c05b236e..42bd902243eca5 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
@@ -144,9 +144,6 @@ struct vfio_regions {
 	size_t len;
 };
 
-#define IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu)	\
-					(!list_empty(&iommu->domain_list))
-
 #define DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(n)	(ALIGN(n, BITS_PER_TYPE(u64)) / BITS_PER_BYTE)
 
 /*
@@ -884,7 +881,7 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_pin_pages(void *iommu_data,
 	 * already pinned and accounted. Accounting should be done if there is no
 	 * iommu capable domain in the container.
 	 */
-	do_accounting = !IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu);
+	do_accounting = list_empty(&iommu->domain_list);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < npage; i++) {
 		struct vfio_pfn *vpfn;
@@ -973,7 +970,7 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_unpin_pages(void *iommu_data,
 
 	mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
 
-	do_accounting = !IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu);
+	do_accounting = list_empty(&iommu->domain_list);
 	for (i = 0; i < npage; i++) {
 		struct vfio_dma *dma;
 		dma_addr_t iova;
@@ -1094,7 +1091,7 @@ static long vfio_unmap_unpin(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma,
 	if (!dma->size)
 		return 0;
 
-	if (!IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu))
+	if (list_empty(&iommu->domain_list))
 		return 0;
 
 	/*
@@ -1671,7 +1668,7 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_map(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
 	vfio_link_dma(iommu, dma);
 
 	/* Don't pin and map if container doesn't contain IOMMU capable domain*/
-	if (!IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu))
+	if (list_empty(&iommu->domain_list))
 		dma->size = size;
 	else
 		ret = vfio_pin_map_dma(iommu, dma, size);
@@ -2477,7 +2474,7 @@ static void vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group(void *iommu_data,
 		kfree(group);
 
 		if (list_empty(&iommu->mediated_groups) &&
-		    !IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu)) {
+		    list_empty(&iommu->domain_list)) {
 			WARN_ON(iommu->notifier.head);
 			vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(iommu);
 		}
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 50+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-09-13  7:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-08-24 14:46 cleanup vfio iommu_group creation v2 Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 01/14] vfio: Move vfio_iommu_group_get() to vfio_register_group_dev() Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-24 20:25   ` Alex Williamson
2021-08-24 22:50     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-25 12:43     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-25 15:48       ` Alex Williamson
2021-08-25 16:08         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 02/14] vfio: factor out a vfio_iommu_driver_allowed helper Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-24 23:24   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 03/14] vfio: remove the iommudata check in vfio_noiommu_attach_group Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-24 23:31   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 04/14] vfio: factor out a vfio_group_find_or_alloc helper Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-24 23:40   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-25  5:30     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 05/14] vfio: refactor noiommu group creation Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-24 23:43   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 06/14] vfio: remove the iommudata hack for noiommu groups Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-24 23:45   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 07/14] vfio: simplify iommu group allocation for mediated devices Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-25  0:19   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-25  5:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-25 12:21       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-25 12:24         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-25 12:34           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-25 12:37             ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-25 12:45               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-25 12:50                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-25 12:50                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 08/14] vfio: remove unused method from vfio_iommu_driver_ops Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-25  0:21   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 09/14] vfio: move the vfio_iommu_driver_ops interface out of <linux/vfio.h> Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-25  0:25   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 10/14] vfio: remove the unused mdev iommu hook Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-25  0:25   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 11/14] vfio: clean up the check for mediated device in vfio_iommu_type1 Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-25  0:28   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-25  5:34     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-25 12:35       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 12/14] vfio/spapr_tce: reject mediated devices Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-25  0:29   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 13/14] vfio/iommu_type1: remove the "external" domain Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-25  0:36   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-25  5:35     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-24 14:46 ` [PATCH 14/14] vfio/iommu_type1: remove IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-25  0:38   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-09-13  7:15 cleanup vfio iommu_group creation v5 Christoph Hellwig
2021-09-13  7:16 ` [PATCH 14/14] vfio/iommu_type1: remove IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-26 13:34 cleanup vfio iommu_group creation v4 Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-26 13:34 ` [PATCH 14/14] vfio/iommu_type1: remove IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-25 16:19 cleanup vfio iommu_group creation v3 Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-25 16:19 ` [PATCH 14/14] vfio/iommu_type1: remove IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-26  4:32   ` Tian, Kevin
2021-08-11 15:14 cleanup vfio iommu_group creation Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-11 15:15 ` [PATCH 14/14] vfio/iommu_type1: remove IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER Christoph Hellwig

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.