All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Murphy Zhou <xzhou@redhat.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, Donald Douwsma <ddouwsma@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tests/xfs: check available blocks after log recovery on ro mount
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 17:15:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210826001550.GJ12612@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALWRkkjTuYSOqv=0NCJhFtVYzO6xyyUd6RwNmv8Nc4vmwi2P7A@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 08:00:33AM +0800, Murphy Zhou wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 7:43 AM Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 12:53:41AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 08:14:28AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 01:04:36PM +0800, Murphy Zhou wrote:
> > > > > And followed by a rw mount.
> > > > >
> > > > > Suggested-by:  Donald Douwsma <ddouwsma@redhat.com>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Murphy Zhou <xzhou@redhat.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks Darrick very much for reviewing!
> > > > >
> > > > > v2:
> > > > >    Add explaination of the issue
> > > > >    add xfs_force_bdev data $SCRATCH_MNT
> > > > >    use DF_PROG
> > > > >    Re numbered this test
> > > > > v3:
> > > > >    Add _require_scratch_shutdown
> > > > >    Use _get_available_space
> > > > >    Explain why does not use _scratch_mount
> > > > >
> > > > >  tests/xfs/999     | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >  tests/xfs/999.out |  2 ++
> > > > >  2 files changed, 67 insertions(+)
> > > > >  create mode 100755 tests/xfs/999
> > > > >  create mode 100644 tests/xfs/999.out
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/999 b/tests/xfs/999
> > > > > new file mode 100755
> > > > > index 00000000..0ce9989b
> > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > +++ b/tests/xfs/999
> > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
> > > > > +#! /bin/bash
> > > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > > > +# Copyright (c) 2021 RedHat All Rights Reserved.
> > > > > +#
> > > > > +# FS QA Test 999
> > > > > +#
> > > > > +# Testcase for kernel commit:
> > > > > +#   50d25484bebe xfs: sync lazy sb accounting on quiesce of read-only mounts
> > > > > +#
> > > > > +# After shutdown and readonly mount, a following read-write mount would
> > > > > +# get wrong number of available blocks. This is caused by unmounting the log
> > > > > +# on a readonly filesystem doesn't log the sb counters.
> > > > > +#
> > > > > +. ./common/preamble
> > > > > +_begin_fstest shutdown auto quick
> > > > > +
> > > > > +# real QA test starts here
> > > > > +
> > > > > +_supported_fs xfs
> > > > > +_require_scratch
> > > > > +_require_scratch_shutdown
> > > > > +
> > > > > +_scratch_mkfs > $seqres.full 2>&1
> > > > > +# Don't use _scratch_mount because we need to mount without SELinux context
> > > > > +# to reproduce this issue. If we mount with SELinux context, this testcase
> > > > > +# is not reproducing the original issue.
> > > > > +mount $SCRATCH_DEV $SCRATCH_MNT
> > > >
> > > > This mount will fail if the test runner configured an external log or a
> > > > realtime device, because you didn't specify those devices to the mount
> > > > call.  Either this needs _require_nonexternal or $(_scratch_options
> > > > mount) needs to be injected into the command line.
> > >
> > > I think I know why Xiong said _scratch_mount can't reproduce this bug.
> > >
> > > Before this patch v3, he tried to find the xfs corruption by using $DF_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT
> > > before&after xfs_repair.
> > >
> > > If we use _scratch_mount, new files we create won't contains SELinux label
> > > in xfs inode attrfork. The corruption comes from sb_ifree (free inodes):
> > >   Phase 2 - using internal log
> > >         - zero log...
> > >         - scan filesystem freespace and inode maps...
> > >   sb_ifree 61, counted 60
> >
> > <shrug> Faulty logging of the superblock can result in any of the
> > summary fields being wrong, so I don't see why this is a problem?
> > As long as at least one of the sb fields has to be corrected, we've
> > successfully found a broken kernel, right?
> >
> > > But if we don't use _scratch_mount, the corruption comes from sb_fdblocks(free blocks):
> > >   Phase 2 - using internal log
> > >         - zero log...
> > >         - scan filesystem freespace and inode maps...
> > >   sb_fdblocks 130086290, counted 131007896
> > >
> > > So if he use _scratch_mount, he can't get different available blocks by
> > > $DF_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT, before&after xfs_repair. Due to the corrupted thing
> > > is sb_ifree.
> > >
> > > But I still can't understand one thing, even if do *not* use _scratch_mount, the attr(selinux label)
> > > is local(short) format[1], didn't take more blocks. What takes more blocks, cause later
> > > sb_fdblocks corruption?
> >
> > /me has no idea either, other than to suggest
> >
> > SELINUX_MOUNT_OPTIONS= _scratch_mount
> >
> > if you don't want the selinux labels to be applied?
> 
> In v5 patch, it's not a problem any more. With _scratch_mount we still
> can reproduce the issue.

Heh, ok, I'll go look at that.  Didn't realize there was a v5 already.

--D

> Thanks!
> 
> >
> > --D
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Zorro
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > ...
> > > core.aformat = 1 (local)
> > > ...
> > > u3 = (empty)
> > > a.sfattr.hdr.totsize = 51
> > > a.sfattr.hdr.count = 1
> > > a.sfattr.list[0].namelen = 7
> > > a.sfattr.list[0].valuelen = 37
> > > a.sfattr.list[0].root = 0
> > > a.sfattr.list[0].secure = 1
> > > a.sfattr.list[0].name = "selinux"
> > > a.sfattr.list[0].value = "unconfined_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0\000"
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > --D
> > > >
> > > > > +_xfs_force_bdev data $SCRATCH_MNT
> > > > > +
> > > > > +# Write test file
> > > > > +ls > $SCRATCH_MNT/testfile
> > > > > +$DF_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> > > > > +
> > > > > +# Shutdown
> > > > > +$XFS_IO_PROG -x -c "shutdown -f" $SCRATCH_MNT
> > > > > +
> > > > > +# Mount ReadOnly
> > > > > +_scratch_unmount
> > > > > +_scratch_mount -oro
> > > > > +$DF_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> > > > > +# Umount and mount rw
> > > > > +_scratch_unmount
> > > > > +_scratch_mount
> > > > > +
> > > > > +# Get fdblocks before repair
> > > > > +fdb1=$(_get_available_space $SCRATCH_MNT)
> > > > > +_scratch_unmount
> > > > > +
> > > > > +# Repair
> > > > > +_repair_scratch_fs >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> > > > > +
> > > > > +# Re-mount
> > > > > +_scratch_mount
> > > > > +
> > > > > +# Get fdblocks after repair
> > > > > +fdb2=$(_get_available_space $SCRATCH_MNT)
> > > > > +
> > > > > +echo fdb1 $fdb1 fdb2 $fdb2 >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> > > > > +
> > > > > +[ $fdb1 -ne $fdb2 ] && echo Wrong fdblocks: $fdb1 and $fdb2
> > > > > +
> > > > > +# success, all done
> > > > > +echo "Silence is golden"
> > > > > +status=0
> > > > > +exit
> > > > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/999.out b/tests/xfs/999.out
> > > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > > index 00000000..3b276ca8
> > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > +++ b/tests/xfs/999.out
> > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> > > > > +QA output created by 999
> > > > > +Silence is golden
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.20.1
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-26  0:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-06  1:49 [PATCH] tests/xfs: check avail blocks after log recovery on ro mount Murphy Zhou
2021-08-06 18:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-23  7:05   ` [PATCH v2] tests/xfs: check available " Murphy Zhou
2021-08-23 17:43     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-24  5:04       ` [PATCH v3] " Murphy Zhou
2021-08-24  5:42         ` Eryu Guan
2021-08-24  6:23         ` Zorro Lang
2021-08-24  9:06           ` [PATCH v4] tests/generic: check log recovery with readonly mount Murphy Zhou
2021-08-24 12:57             ` Zorro Lang
2021-08-24 23:22           ` [PATCH v3] tests/xfs: check available blocks after log recovery on ro mount Donald Douwsma
2021-08-25  1:06             ` Donald Douwsma
2021-08-25  3:26               ` [PATCH v5] tests/generic: check log recovery with readonly mount Murphy Zhou
2021-08-26  0:17                 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-26  7:01                 ` Zorro Lang
2021-08-24 15:14         ` [PATCH v3] tests/xfs: check available blocks after log recovery on ro mount Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-24 16:53           ` Zorro Lang
2021-08-25 23:43             ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-08-26  0:00               ` Murphy Zhou
2021-08-26  0:15                 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2021-08-26  6:59               ` Zorro Lang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210826001550.GJ12612@magnolia \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=ddouwsma@redhat.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xzhou@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.