From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-19.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2008BC432BE for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 19:41:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E4B60FDA for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 19:41:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243356AbhHZTmH (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 15:42:07 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:22335 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243485AbhHZTmG (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 15:42:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1630006878; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=IZxI6wOoaWT81ALa8QkvdxqAQKY5lKnGUs6cJrU25Fs=; b=RRgn1bKlERf8XUV/0EPJaSSTK9ZiwOWppz0HKpv5Vg6SEw4hd7aEJM3kA5B661quNMCPiW jPV/4wJg6bMs08qknVPmPQ4/9erUF75egxAJA3/6nv1J8XnlWoJX3sdXZ88aWmmGSuCDPb StP2/y95AhwQmdoqwLdLh4r9Kweaucw= Received: from mail-wr1-f72.google.com (mail-wr1-f72.google.com [209.85.221.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-563-ZTiVIGMuNnOq-jEMHPesCg-1; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 15:41:17 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ZTiVIGMuNnOq-jEMHPesCg-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f72.google.com with SMTP id b7-20020a5d4d87000000b001575d1053d2so1180704wru.23 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 12:41:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IZxI6wOoaWT81ALa8QkvdxqAQKY5lKnGUs6cJrU25Fs=; b=FlOEonjOs+3ProEJJXJanv9DRajuCoJgmi+4G1l3phr1A1GaByjvOt+1vEnaFxHrgV eGs8sXPilMCLKX26gRwSxzLCFwzcOw2jtrR1Ob0MLZHlUjvrd927NpVVAZEdR9kufgKM Li3U+8E5q3qEymIokZ5rjMDxeTDfHnHetiVHtpN2eXos6h2/hGFoIlXcmEQhDIOQ3Yve gVme53EXPqSSiE4/SwvVdWFm3LRcVTYT9CYcxR8o8ryIa6OGWjWq/qheaQcr072yy2vx eL8QcvXzSGdldq64RX4+s69BNmZydaB+zqfyKEJ8vW3uoHQEDGL7t8ymkt+HpqyuewbC C4KQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53387xncoqCgjYd+Y4G/ge97pGR9sL1dgE9EARWbCbEv9VYak2Dg F6D2fdC6AKnnkP4Ed/U4B3pn9tbK+c519tQBXbeeKRao13vO9l+uxxjlWjXssUMQ4mg6AjoJeur UWbtkLiaeDIMk X-Received: by 2002:adf:9f0d:: with SMTP id l13mr848694wrf.328.1630006875831; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 12:41:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwo67KkXMdAPOOGMrz24uHf7y9/tWyscdaPfYgn96pwyBfYz/iJlHc46O9G4R2MLdO7VZ/buQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:9f0d:: with SMTP id l13mr848672wrf.328.1630006875603; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 12:41:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from krava.redhat.com ([83.240.63.86]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n14sm4018343wrx.10.2021.08.26.12.41.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 12:41:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Jiri Olsa X-Google-Original-From: Jiri Olsa To: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Daniel Xu , Viktor Malik Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 18/27] bpf, x64: Store properly return value for trampoline with multi func programs Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 21:39:13 +0200 Message-Id: <20210826193922.66204-19-jolsa@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20210826193922.66204-1-jolsa@kernel.org> References: <20210826193922.66204-1-jolsa@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org When we have multi func program attached, the trampoline switched to the function model of the multi func program. This breaks already attached standard programs, for example when we attach following program: SEC("fexit/bpf_fentry_test2") int BPF_PROG(test1, int a, __u64 b, int ret) the trampoline pushes on stack args 'a' and 'b' and return value 'ret'. When following multi func program is attached to bpf_fentry_test2: SEC("fexit.multi/bpf_fentry_test*") int BPF_PROG(test2, __u64 a, __u64 b, __u64 c, __u64 d, __u64 e, __u64 f, int ret) the trampoline takes this program model and pushes all 6 args and return value on stack. But we still have the original 'test1' program attached, that expects 'ret' value where there's 'c' argument now: test1(a, b, c) To fix that we simply overwrite 'c' argument with 'ret' value, so test1 is called as expected and test2 gets called as: test2(a, b, ret, d, e, f, ret) which is ok, because 'c' is not defined for bpf_fentry_test2 anyway. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa --- arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- include/linux/bpf.h | 1 + kernel/bpf/trampoline.c | 1 + 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 9f31197780ae..3f7911a92d62 100644 --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -1744,7 +1744,7 @@ static void restore_regs(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **prog, int nr_args, } static int invoke_bpf_prog(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog, - struct bpf_prog *p, int stack_size, bool mod_ret) + struct bpf_prog *p, int stack_size, bool mod_ret, int args_off) { u8 *prog = *pprog; u8 *jmp_insn; @@ -1780,9 +1780,14 @@ static int invoke_bpf_prog(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog, /* BPF_TRAMP_MODIFY_RETURN trampolines can modify the return * of the previous call which is then passed on the stack to * the next BPF program. + * Store the return value also to original args' end in case + * we have multi func programs in trampoline. */ - if (mod_ret) + if (mod_ret) { emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_0, -8); + if (args_off) + emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_0, -args_off); + } /* replace 2 nops with JE insn, since jmp target is known */ jmp_insn[0] = X86_JE; @@ -1834,7 +1839,7 @@ static int invoke_bpf(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog, u8 *prog = *pprog; for (i = 0; i < tp->nr_progs; i++) { - if (invoke_bpf_prog(m, &prog, tp->progs[i], stack_size, false)) + if (invoke_bpf_prog(m, &prog, tp->progs[i], stack_size, false, 0)) return -EINVAL; } *pprog = prog; @@ -1843,7 +1848,7 @@ static int invoke_bpf(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog, static int invoke_bpf_mod_ret(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog, struct bpf_tramp_progs *tp, int stack_size, - u8 **branches) + u8 **branches, int args_off) { u8 *prog = *pprog; int i; @@ -1853,8 +1858,15 @@ static int invoke_bpf_mod_ret(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog, */ emit_mov_imm32(&prog, false, BPF_REG_0, 0); emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_0, -8); + + /* Store the return value also to original args' end in case + * we have multi func programs in trampoline. + */ + if (args_off) + emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_0, -args_off); + for (i = 0; i < tp->nr_progs; i++) { - if (invoke_bpf_prog(m, &prog, tp->progs[i], stack_size, true)) + if (invoke_bpf_prog(m, &prog, tp->progs[i], stack_size, true, args_off)) return -EINVAL; /* mod_ret prog stored return value into [rbp - 8]. Emit: @@ -1942,7 +1954,7 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i struct bpf_tramp_progs *tprogs, void *orig_call) { - int ret, i, nr_args = m->nr_args; + int ret, i, args_off = 0, nr_args = m->nr_args; int stack_size = nr_args * 8; struct bpf_tramp_progs *fentry = &tprogs[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY]; struct bpf_tramp_progs *fexit = &tprogs[BPF_TRAMP_FEXIT]; @@ -1958,6 +1970,13 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_SKIP_FRAME)) return -EINVAL; + /* if m->nr_args_orig != 0, then we have multi prog model and + * we need to also store return value at the end of standard + * trampoline's arguments + */ + if (m->nr_args_orig && m->nr_args > m->nr_args_orig) + args_off = (m->nr_args - m->nr_args_orig) * 8 + 8; + if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) stack_size += 8; /* room for return value of orig_call */ @@ -2015,7 +2034,7 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i return -ENOMEM; if (invoke_bpf_mod_ret(m, &prog, fmod_ret, stack_size, - branches)) { + branches, args_off)) { ret = -EINVAL; goto cleanup; } @@ -2036,6 +2055,13 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i } /* remember return value in a stack for bpf prog to access */ emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_0, -8); + + /* store return value also to original args' end in case we have + * multi func programs in trampoline + */ + if (args_off) + emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_0, -args_off); + im->ip_after_call = prog; memcpy(prog, x86_nops[5], X86_PATCH_SIZE); prog += X86_PATCH_SIZE; diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h index 3ce4656e2057..373f45ae7dce 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h @@ -563,6 +563,7 @@ struct btf_func_model { u8 ret_size; u8 nr_args; u8 arg_size[MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS]; + u8 nr_args_orig; }; /* Restore arguments before returning from trampoline to let original function diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c index 6ff5c2512f91..308d58e698be 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c @@ -398,6 +398,7 @@ static bool needs_multi_model(struct bpf_trampoline *tr, struct btf_func_model * if (tr->func.model.nr_args >= multi->func.model.nr_args) return false; memcpy(new, &multi->func.model, sizeof(*new)); + new->nr_args_orig = tr->func.model.nr_args; return true; } -- 2.31.1