From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8D15C43214 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 15:04:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C132E60F46 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 15:04:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235515AbhH2PEw (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Aug 2021 11:04:52 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:34156 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229824AbhH2PEv (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Aug 2021 11:04:51 -0400 Received: from jic23-huawei (cpc108967-cmbg20-2-0-cust86.5-4.cable.virginm.net [81.101.6.87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED45C60F36; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 15:03:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 16:07:08 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Billy Tsai Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [RESEND v4 02/15] iio: adc: aspeed: completes the bitfield declare. Message-ID: <20210829160708.2b1a26c0@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: <20210824091243.9393-3-billy_tsai@aspeedtech.com> References: <20210824091243.9393-1-billy_tsai@aspeedtech.com> <20210824091243.9393-3-billy_tsai@aspeedtech.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 17:12:30 +0800 Billy Tsai wrote: > This patch completes the declare of adc register bitfields and uses the > same prefix ASPEED_ADC_* for these bitfields. > > Signed-off-by: Billy Tsai > --- > drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c > index 19efaa41bc34..7010d56ac3b9 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ > * Aspeed AST2400/2500 ADC > * > * Copyright (C) 2017 Google, Inc. > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Aspeed Technology Inc. > */ > > #include > @@ -16,6 +17,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > > #include > #include > @@ -28,15 +30,31 @@ > #define ASPEED_REG_INTERRUPT_CONTROL 0x04 > #define ASPEED_REG_VGA_DETECT_CONTROL 0x08 > #define ASPEED_REG_CLOCK_CONTROL 0x0C > -#define ASPEED_REG_MAX 0xC0 > - > -#define ASPEED_OPERATION_MODE_POWER_DOWN (0x0 << 1) > -#define ASPEED_OPERATION_MODE_STANDBY (0x1 << 1) > -#define ASPEED_OPERATION_MODE_NORMAL (0x7 << 1) > - > -#define ASPEED_ENGINE_ENABLE BIT(0) > - > -#define ASPEED_ADC_CTRL_INIT_RDY BIT(8) > +#define ASPEED_REG_COMPENSATION_TRIM 0xC4 > +#define ASPEED_REG_MAX 0xCC This REG_MAX value is used as a sanity check for debugfs based access. As this raises the limit for all devices supported by the driver, not just the new ast2600, are we fine to read these non existent registers on the other parts? If so, perhaps a comment to say that here somewhere? > + > +#define ASPEED_ADC_ENGINE_ENABLE BIT(0) Are all the following in the same register? Bit usual to have overlapping fields, so if they are, perhaps a few comments to explain what is going on would be good. > +#define ASPEED_ADC_OP_MODE GENMASK(3, 1) > +#define ASPEED_ADC_OP_MODE_PWR_DOWN 0 > +#define ASPEED_ADC_OP_MODE_STANDBY 1 > +#define ASPEED_ADC_OP_MODE_NORMAL 7 > +#define ASPEED_ADC_CTRL_COMPENSATION BIT(4) > +#define ASPEED_ADC_AUTO_COMPENSATION BIT(5) > +#define ASPEED_ADC_REF_VOLTAGE GENMASK(7, 6) > +#define ASPEED_ADC_REF_VOLTAGE_2500mV 0 > +#define ASPEED_ADC_REF_VOLTAGE_1200mV 1 > +#define ASPEED_ADC_REF_VOLTAGE_EXT_HIGH 2 > +#define ASPEED_ADC_REF_VOLTAGE_EXT_LOW 3 > +#define ASPEED_ADC_BAT_SENSING_DIV BIT(6) > +#define ASPEED_ADC_BAT_SENSING_DIV_2_3 0 > +#define ASPEED_ADC_BAT_SENSING_DIV_1_3 1 > +#define ASPEED_ADC_CTRL_INIT_RDY BIT(8) > +#define ASPEED_ADC_CH7_MODE BIT(12) > +#define ASPEED_ADC_CH7_NORMAL 0 > +#define ASPEED_ADC_CH7_BAT 1 > +#define ASPEED_ADC_BAT_SENSING_ENABLE BIT(13) > +#define ASPEED_ADC_CTRL_CHANNEL GENMASK(31, 16) > +#define ASPEED_ADC_CTRL_CHANNEL_ENABLE(ch) FIELD_PREP(ASPEED_ADC_CTRL_CHANNEL, BIT(ch)) > > #define ASPEED_ADC_INIT_POLLING_TIME 500 > #define ASPEED_ADC_INIT_TIMEOUT 500000 > @@ -226,7 +244,9 @@ static int aspeed_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > if (model_data->wait_init_sequence) { > /* Enable engine in normal mode. */ > - writel(ASPEED_OPERATION_MODE_NORMAL | ASPEED_ENGINE_ENABLE, > + writel(FIELD_PREP(ASPEED_ADC_OP_MODE, > + ASPEED_ADC_OP_MODE_NORMAL) | > + ASPEED_ADC_ENGINE_ENABLE, > data->base + ASPEED_REG_ENGINE_CONTROL); > > /* Wait for initial sequence complete. */ > @@ -245,10 +265,12 @@ static int aspeed_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (ret) > goto clk_enable_error; > > - adc_engine_control_reg_val = GENMASK(31, 16) | > - ASPEED_OPERATION_MODE_NORMAL | ASPEED_ENGINE_ENABLE; > + adc_engine_control_reg_val = > + ASPEED_ADC_CTRL_CHANNEL | > + FIELD_PREP(ASPEED_ADC_OP_MODE, ASPEED_ADC_OP_MODE_NORMAL) | > + ASPEED_ADC_ENGINE_ENABLE; > writel(adc_engine_control_reg_val, > - data->base + ASPEED_REG_ENGINE_CONTROL); > + data->base + ASPEED_REG_ENGINE_CONTROL); > > model_data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev); > indio_dev->name = model_data->model_name; > @@ -264,8 +286,8 @@ static int aspeed_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return 0; > > iio_register_error: > - writel(ASPEED_OPERATION_MODE_POWER_DOWN, > - data->base + ASPEED_REG_ENGINE_CONTROL); > + writel(FIELD_PREP(ASPEED_ADC_OP_MODE, ASPEED_ADC_OP_MODE_PWR_DOWN), > + data->base + ASPEED_REG_ENGINE_CONTROL); > clk_disable_unprepare(data->clk_scaler->clk); > clk_enable_error: > poll_timeout_error: > @@ -283,8 +305,8 @@ static int aspeed_adc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > struct aspeed_adc_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev); > > iio_device_unregister(indio_dev); > - writel(ASPEED_OPERATION_MODE_POWER_DOWN, > - data->base + ASPEED_REG_ENGINE_CONTROL); > + writel(FIELD_PREP(ASPEED_ADC_OP_MODE, ASPEED_ADC_OP_MODE_PWR_DOWN), > + data->base + ASPEED_REG_ENGINE_CONTROL); Ideally these white space changes would be in a precursor patch. At the very least mention them in the patch description. They are good thing to tidy up, but they do add noise to this patch. > clk_disable_unprepare(data->clk_scaler->clk); > reset_control_assert(data->rst); > clk_hw_unregister_divider(data->clk_scaler); From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4F1C432BE for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 15:06:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1B766054F for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 15:06:08 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org E1B766054F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=YDLJic92VvhdRVAG4SngC3/078OWMdMWkHbGyIKmsW0=; b=A8gnOuD2vCT7yN vdsgd0c0EbgnweUkBRkViKAd5wRhVo1VGa9HOYMyF68DcIpSrys1mC9L2XlLlnX7h743MpPMmAdwr /sGrUfAFRwuKrT1EcN4qzB330ofZww8aIhd0+BQvAsiaxBOFDkWBLFu5Pap6O74/z9jtEgPX4pFFW +L73ittNaZg1EiH5uTr246Oh4ET96XF2qHNuzdKjQt41CP31e2/2qTbcldHTrVu4egPLB/Pcs5C0C kDCz/Unsl9Phat8FBOhTk5yux+Ly2P0A8epfI1qHPxxAEupXq0a5JWo53vPfYZ4tofSkab63IQ2x6 efeAiKFnihkVFqascWcw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mKMLq-00Feok-LL; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 15:04:02 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mKMLn-00FekN-85 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 15:04:00 +0000 Received: from jic23-huawei (cpc108967-cmbg20-2-0-cust86.5-4.cable.virginm.net [81.101.6.87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED45C60F36; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 15:03:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 16:07:08 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Billy Tsai Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [RESEND v4 02/15] iio: adc: aspeed: completes the bitfield declare. Message-ID: <20210829160708.2b1a26c0@jic23-huawei> In-Reply-To: <20210824091243.9393-3-billy_tsai@aspeedtech.com> References: <20210824091243.9393-1-billy_tsai@aspeedtech.com> <20210824091243.9393-3-billy_tsai@aspeedtech.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210829_080359_384626_FCA0CA44 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 28.49 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 17:12:30 +0800 Billy Tsai wrote: > This patch completes the declare of adc register bitfields and uses the > same prefix ASPEED_ADC_* for these bitfields. > > Signed-off-by: Billy Tsai > --- > drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c > index 19efaa41bc34..7010d56ac3b9 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/aspeed_adc.c > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ > * Aspeed AST2400/2500 ADC > * > * Copyright (C) 2017 Google, Inc. > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Aspeed Technology Inc. > */ > > #include > @@ -16,6 +17,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > > #include > #include > @@ -28,15 +30,31 @@ > #define ASPEED_REG_INTERRUPT_CONTROL 0x04 > #define ASPEED_REG_VGA_DETECT_CONTROL 0x08 > #define ASPEED_REG_CLOCK_CONTROL 0x0C > -#define ASPEED_REG_MAX 0xC0 > - > -#define ASPEED_OPERATION_MODE_POWER_DOWN (0x0 << 1) > -#define ASPEED_OPERATION_MODE_STANDBY (0x1 << 1) > -#define ASPEED_OPERATION_MODE_NORMAL (0x7 << 1) > - > -#define ASPEED_ENGINE_ENABLE BIT(0) > - > -#define ASPEED_ADC_CTRL_INIT_RDY BIT(8) > +#define ASPEED_REG_COMPENSATION_TRIM 0xC4 > +#define ASPEED_REG_MAX 0xCC This REG_MAX value is used as a sanity check for debugfs based access. As this raises the limit for all devices supported by the driver, not just the new ast2600, are we fine to read these non existent registers on the other parts? If so, perhaps a comment to say that here somewhere? > + > +#define ASPEED_ADC_ENGINE_ENABLE BIT(0) Are all the following in the same register? Bit usual to have overlapping fields, so if they are, perhaps a few comments to explain what is going on would be good. > +#define ASPEED_ADC_OP_MODE GENMASK(3, 1) > +#define ASPEED_ADC_OP_MODE_PWR_DOWN 0 > +#define ASPEED_ADC_OP_MODE_STANDBY 1 > +#define ASPEED_ADC_OP_MODE_NORMAL 7 > +#define ASPEED_ADC_CTRL_COMPENSATION BIT(4) > +#define ASPEED_ADC_AUTO_COMPENSATION BIT(5) > +#define ASPEED_ADC_REF_VOLTAGE GENMASK(7, 6) > +#define ASPEED_ADC_REF_VOLTAGE_2500mV 0 > +#define ASPEED_ADC_REF_VOLTAGE_1200mV 1 > +#define ASPEED_ADC_REF_VOLTAGE_EXT_HIGH 2 > +#define ASPEED_ADC_REF_VOLTAGE_EXT_LOW 3 > +#define ASPEED_ADC_BAT_SENSING_DIV BIT(6) > +#define ASPEED_ADC_BAT_SENSING_DIV_2_3 0 > +#define ASPEED_ADC_BAT_SENSING_DIV_1_3 1 > +#define ASPEED_ADC_CTRL_INIT_RDY BIT(8) > +#define ASPEED_ADC_CH7_MODE BIT(12) > +#define ASPEED_ADC_CH7_NORMAL 0 > +#define ASPEED_ADC_CH7_BAT 1 > +#define ASPEED_ADC_BAT_SENSING_ENABLE BIT(13) > +#define ASPEED_ADC_CTRL_CHANNEL GENMASK(31, 16) > +#define ASPEED_ADC_CTRL_CHANNEL_ENABLE(ch) FIELD_PREP(ASPEED_ADC_CTRL_CHANNEL, BIT(ch)) > > #define ASPEED_ADC_INIT_POLLING_TIME 500 > #define ASPEED_ADC_INIT_TIMEOUT 500000 > @@ -226,7 +244,9 @@ static int aspeed_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > if (model_data->wait_init_sequence) { > /* Enable engine in normal mode. */ > - writel(ASPEED_OPERATION_MODE_NORMAL | ASPEED_ENGINE_ENABLE, > + writel(FIELD_PREP(ASPEED_ADC_OP_MODE, > + ASPEED_ADC_OP_MODE_NORMAL) | > + ASPEED_ADC_ENGINE_ENABLE, > data->base + ASPEED_REG_ENGINE_CONTROL); > > /* Wait for initial sequence complete. */ > @@ -245,10 +265,12 @@ static int aspeed_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (ret) > goto clk_enable_error; > > - adc_engine_control_reg_val = GENMASK(31, 16) | > - ASPEED_OPERATION_MODE_NORMAL | ASPEED_ENGINE_ENABLE; > + adc_engine_control_reg_val = > + ASPEED_ADC_CTRL_CHANNEL | > + FIELD_PREP(ASPEED_ADC_OP_MODE, ASPEED_ADC_OP_MODE_NORMAL) | > + ASPEED_ADC_ENGINE_ENABLE; > writel(adc_engine_control_reg_val, > - data->base + ASPEED_REG_ENGINE_CONTROL); > + data->base + ASPEED_REG_ENGINE_CONTROL); > > model_data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev); > indio_dev->name = model_data->model_name; > @@ -264,8 +286,8 @@ static int aspeed_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return 0; > > iio_register_error: > - writel(ASPEED_OPERATION_MODE_POWER_DOWN, > - data->base + ASPEED_REG_ENGINE_CONTROL); > + writel(FIELD_PREP(ASPEED_ADC_OP_MODE, ASPEED_ADC_OP_MODE_PWR_DOWN), > + data->base + ASPEED_REG_ENGINE_CONTROL); > clk_disable_unprepare(data->clk_scaler->clk); > clk_enable_error: > poll_timeout_error: > @@ -283,8 +305,8 @@ static int aspeed_adc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > struct aspeed_adc_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev); > > iio_device_unregister(indio_dev); > - writel(ASPEED_OPERATION_MODE_POWER_DOWN, > - data->base + ASPEED_REG_ENGINE_CONTROL); > + writel(FIELD_PREP(ASPEED_ADC_OP_MODE, ASPEED_ADC_OP_MODE_PWR_DOWN), > + data->base + ASPEED_REG_ENGINE_CONTROL); Ideally these white space changes would be in a precursor patch. At the very least mention them in the patch description. They are good thing to tidy up, but they do add noise to this patch. > clk_disable_unprepare(data->clk_scaler->clk); > reset_control_assert(data->rst); > clk_hw_unregister_divider(data->clk_scaler); _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel