From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 906B5C432BE for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 12:55:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F9E60524 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 12:55:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233272AbhH3M4C (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:56:02 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54790 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232454AbhH3M4B (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2021 08:56:01 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-xf33.google.com (mail-qv1-xf33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f33]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77357C061575 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 05:55:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qv1-xf33.google.com with SMTP id l4so8138273qvl.12 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 05:55:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ubique-spb-ru.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ttVYJm0Znr1K2DxkaN4d1dJSR/5BjfnpqwfsdarTcD0=; b=PYbIDPGALPnr0kfAXg9anSnoJo9L9FhtF5RFh3ymr0vTO5jOH6wmhUMEO3kTCAqMcq QD5zYX/Z8DlUrvnBu2W4I7f4qqY42QkACBDUO7zL++tGFz2rGgZQKPksKuj6D576MZ/5 j6cVzgEOQeztsOe9vkaF1TIMzF9Q1TvsTrwdNHpL2KidJ5xK+WqcqD02vb7sYFK1hf2l EJXOfNeccgkd3fANJjX7zy/8JWOEwMDJmB/WY99mMgoBLLFW9/XWs6FCvuNgfvM7fQQh 2Mf2POf+qLn4A7kiLq60xAONdbu+CrSRLHFg7hZ7V86Y3R6fciS+bt6L4PIVIV7+iWiW njVg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ttVYJm0Znr1K2DxkaN4d1dJSR/5BjfnpqwfsdarTcD0=; b=bk65bSYhAC8wTf/eRLKNkKUfpam8dsTcXKNljxj0bXxzZdwGDflpjiJA/a8BtCt3jX NLtVaz2u4Y0znFWnla8Bafg2BSdsIDu7Wa5uzW3SeUnLWX9t0/Os5fPhiX4uIca1022Z N2Eq4/azjc6fi/5a7aSVpVzlSWCW0WDHgyrQQs1P6x+icI52ph0dUmZK6/YLgXX1ZcxB NN1MmcqX82WCoAanAVPQZQPCmhxzs1PgmpmtFj2kDW8+ohxBe/N1aRK187UYI5krzuYU wyZl6VRvUOXjopjo7X4SdfwfsloggyXKi9lVybdxByI0EtXLYduFeLIhAWksdXArk49c /h4w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531szz8CMMCc+oSylvE5JTvwVmUVpr4aMLRYig9dovmuid622wga wb5YFa+thQSs0t38mdhIf1I+7AD9XBTvLQ/s X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxgzwbE+xmU9zO6xzPk3YKnV07LLPiBvSAGkgUbDSWpMlcO1XLGu16IkJ8h0pD4orpRAWvTrQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:84c:: with SMTP id dg12mr23168511qvb.29.1630328106662; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 05:55:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([154.21.15.43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w20sm8324418qtj.72.2021.08.30.05.55.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 30 Aug 2021 05:55:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 16:54:59 +0400 From: Dmitrii Banshchikov To: Raymond Burkholder Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/13] bpfilter Message-ID: <20210830125459.qk62gb5ak6xij4ug@amnesia> References: <20210829183608.2297877-1-me@ubique.spb.ru> <42c5e32a-edb9-08a3-f37f-9def9583f5fc@oneunified.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42c5e32a-edb9-08a3-f37f-9def9583f5fc@oneunified.net> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 01:13:53PM -0600, Raymond Burkholder wrote: > On 8/29/21 12:35 PM, Dmitrii Banshchikov wrote: > > The patchset is based on the patches from David S. Miller [1] and > > Daniel Borkmann [2]. > > > > The main goal of the patchset is to prepare bpfilter for > > iptables' configuration blob parsing and code generation. > > The referenced patches are from 2018. Since then, and since this is > bpf-next, places like [1] indicate that we are moving on from iptables > towards nftables. > > Any thoughts? I'm not sure what kind of thoughts you expect. If your question is why to use an outdated interface the answer is - this is just a starting point and nothing prevents us from having our own interface in future . > > [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Iptables > -- Dmitrii Banshchikov