From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B73C432BE for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 13:45:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC5D2610A0 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 13:45:00 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org BC5D2610A0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:35850 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLn1X-0004t6-W3 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 09:45:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44860) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLmZS-00082h-3S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 09:15:58 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:52858) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLmZP-0007Wi-My for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 09:15:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1630588555; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=R5F20T6p6BJI8e0+LNcQQ1EFakDtWid4m/qqflFbx0w=; b=ZGQVU0CpQ54jl7Kocizy8EojQlweC+X+YTysOjxEcktFMPFMTxmIB9BfU2cKEqvDromqi3 8sSriv0GjJ91p0cH0Rs1MtjupXEVhGY5+e/Wv4Y8HQOoWjBMCi+3o3+Nc2aX3BSBKHrRBv +xFc0ukvDkqsgMepsy7BYTKNZs7epao= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-153-EPHtPvOOOMaK7Z-XLHB0hw-1; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 09:15:54 -0400 X-MC-Unique: EPHtPvOOOMaK7Z-XLHB0hw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B20D0189C442; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 13:15:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from t480s.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.193.198]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67DDB6B541; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 13:15:49 +0000 (UTC) From: David Hildenbrand To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH v4 6/9] migration/postcopy: Handle RAMBlocks with a RamDiscardManager on the destination Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 15:14:29 +0200 Message-Id: <20210902131432.23103-7-david@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20210902131432.23103-1-david@redhat.com> References: <20210902131432.23103-1-david@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=david@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -31 X-Spam_score: -3.2 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.39, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Eduardo Habkost , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Pankaj Gupta , Juan Quintela , David Hildenbrand , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Peter Xu , Marek Kedzierski , Alex Williamson , teawater , Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?q?Philippe=20Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Andrey Gruzdev , Wei Yang Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Currently, when someone (i.e., the VM) accesses discarded parts inside a RAMBlock with a RamDiscardManager managing the corresponding mapped memory region, postcopy will request migration of the corresponding page from the source. The source, however, will never answer, because it refuses to migrate such pages with undefined content ("logically unplugged"): the pages are never dirty, and get_queued_page() will consequently skip processing these postcopy requests. Especially reading discarded ("logically unplugged") ranges is supposed to work in some setups (for example with current virtio-mem), although it barely ever happens: still, not placing a page would currently stall the VM, as it cannot make forward progress. Let's check the state via the RamDiscardManager (the state e.g., of virtio-mem is migrated during precopy) and avoid sending a request that will never get answered. Place a fresh zero page instead to keep the VM working. This is the same behavior that would happen automatically without userfaultfd being active, when accessing virtual memory regions without populated pages -- "populate on demand". For now, there are valid cases (as documented in the virtio-mem spec) where a VM might read discarded memory; in the future, we will disallow that. Then, we might want to handle that case differently, e.g., warning the user that the VM seems to be mis-behaving. Reviewed-by: Peter Xu Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand --- migration/postcopy-ram.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- migration/ram.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ migration/ram.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/migration/postcopy-ram.c b/migration/postcopy-ram.c index 2e9697bdd2..39e3e057b4 100644 --- a/migration/postcopy-ram.c +++ b/migration/postcopy-ram.c @@ -671,6 +671,29 @@ int postcopy_wake_shared(struct PostCopyFD *pcfd, return ret; } +static int postcopy_request_page(MigrationIncomingState *mis, RAMBlock *rb, + ram_addr_t start, uint64_t haddr) +{ + void *aligned = (void *)QEMU_ALIGN_DOWN(haddr, qemu_ram_pagesize(rb)); + + /* + * Discarded pages (via RamDiscardManager) are never migrated. On unlikely + * access, place a zeropage, which will also set the relevant bits in the + * recv_bitmap accordingly, so we won't try placing a zeropage twice. + * + * Checking a single bit is sufficient to handle pagesize > TPS as either + * all relevant bits are set or not. + */ + assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(start, qemu_ram_pagesize(rb))); + if (ramblock_page_is_discarded(rb, start)) { + bool received = ramblock_recv_bitmap_test_byte_offset(rb, start); + + return received ? 0 : postcopy_place_page_zero(mis, aligned, rb); + } + + return migrate_send_rp_req_pages(mis, rb, start, haddr); +} + /* * Callback from shared fault handlers to ask for a page, * the page must be specified by a RAMBlock and an offset in that rb @@ -690,7 +713,7 @@ int postcopy_request_shared_page(struct PostCopyFD *pcfd, RAMBlock *rb, qemu_ram_get_idstr(rb), rb_offset); return postcopy_wake_shared(pcfd, client_addr, rb); } - migrate_send_rp_req_pages(mis, rb, aligned_rbo, client_addr); + postcopy_request_page(mis, rb, aligned_rbo, client_addr); return 0; } @@ -984,8 +1007,8 @@ retry: * Send the request to the source - we want to request one * of our host page sizes (which is >= TPS) */ - ret = migrate_send_rp_req_pages(mis, rb, rb_offset, - msg.arg.pagefault.address); + ret = postcopy_request_page(mis, rb, rb_offset, + msg.arg.pagefault.address); if (ret) { /* May be network failure, try to wait for recovery */ if (ret == -EIO && postcopy_pause_fault_thread(mis)) { @@ -993,7 +1016,7 @@ retry: goto retry; } else { /* This is a unavoidable fault */ - error_report("%s: migrate_send_rp_req_pages() get %d", + error_report("%s: postcopy_request_page() get %d", __func__, ret); break; } diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c index 3be969f749..e8abe10ddb 100644 --- a/migration/ram.c +++ b/migration/ram.c @@ -912,6 +912,27 @@ static uint64_t ramblock_dirty_bitmap_clear_discarded_pages(RAMBlock *rb) return cleared_bits; } +/* + * Check if a host-page aligned page falls into a discarded range as managed by + * a RamDiscardManager responsible for the mapped memory region of the RAMBlock. + * + * Note: The result is only stable while migrating (precopy/postcopy). + */ +bool ramblock_page_is_discarded(RAMBlock *rb, ram_addr_t start) +{ + if (rb->mr && memory_region_has_ram_discard_manager(rb->mr)) { + RamDiscardManager *rdm = memory_region_get_ram_discard_manager(rb->mr); + MemoryRegionSection section = { + .mr = rb->mr, + .offset_within_region = start, + .size = int128_get64(qemu_ram_pagesize(rb)), + }; + + return !ram_discard_manager_is_populated(rdm, §ion); + } + return false; +} + /* Called with RCU critical section */ static void ramblock_sync_dirty_bitmap(RAMState *rs, RAMBlock *rb) { diff --git a/migration/ram.h b/migration/ram.h index 4833e9fd5b..dda1988f3d 100644 --- a/migration/ram.h +++ b/migration/ram.h @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ void ramblock_recv_bitmap_set_range(RAMBlock *rb, void *host_addr, size_t nr); int64_t ramblock_recv_bitmap_send(QEMUFile *file, const char *block_name); int ram_dirty_bitmap_reload(MigrationState *s, RAMBlock *rb); +bool ramblock_page_is_discarded(RAMBlock *rb, ram_addr_t start); /* ram cache */ int colo_init_ram_cache(void); -- 2.31.1