All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests: arm64: Verify that all possible vector lengths are handled
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 13:08:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210917120855.13858-5-broonie@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210917120855.13858-1-broonie@kernel.org>

As part of the enumeration interface for setting vector lengths it is valid
to set vector lengths not supported in the system, these will be rounded to
a supported vector length and returned from the prctl(). Add a test which
exercises this for every valid vector length and makes sure that the return
value is as expected and that this is reflected in the actual system state.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c
index 9d6ac843e651..de11cd2f5d79 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c
@@ -540,6 +540,76 @@ static void prctl_set_onexec(struct vec_data *data)
 	file_write_integer(data->default_vl_file, data->default_vl);
 }
 
+/* For each VQ verify that setting via prctl() does the right thing */
+static void prctl_set_all_vqs(struct vec_data *data)
+{
+	int ret, vq, vl, new_vl;
+	int errors = 0;
+
+	for (vq = SVE_VQ_MIN; vq <= SVE_VQ_MAX; vq++) {
+		vl = sve_vl_from_vq(vq);
+
+		/* Attempt to set the VL */
+		ret = prctl(data->prctl_set, vl);
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			errors++;
+			ksft_print_msg("%s prctl set failed for %d: %d (%s)\n",
+				       data->name, vl,
+				       errno, strerror(errno));
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		new_vl = ret & PR_SVE_VL_LEN_MASK;
+
+		/* Check that we actually have the reported new VL */
+		if (data->rdvl() != new_vl) {
+			ksft_print_msg("Set %s VL %d but RDVL reports %d\n",
+				       data->name, new_vl, data->rdvl());
+			errors++;
+		}
+
+		/* Was that the VL we asked for? */
+		if (new_vl == vl)
+			continue;
+
+		/* Should round up to the minimum VL if below it */
+		if (vl < data->min_vl) {
+			if (new_vl != data->min_vl) {
+				ksft_print_msg("%s VL %d returned %d not minimum %d\n",
+					       data->name, vl, new_vl,
+					       data->min_vl);
+				errors++;
+			}
+
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		/* Should round down to maximum VL if above it */
+		if (vl > data->max_vl) {
+			if (new_vl != data->max_vl) {
+				ksft_print_msg("%s VL %d returned %d not maximum %d\n",
+					       data->name, vl, new_vl,
+					       data->max_vl);
+				errors++;
+			}
+
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		/* Otherwise we should've rounded down */
+		if (!(new_vl < vl)) {
+			ksft_print_msg("%s VL %d returned %d, did not round down\n",
+				       data->name, vl, new_vl);
+			errors++;
+
+			continue;
+		}
+	}
+
+	ksft_test_result(errors == 0, "%s prctl() set all VLs, %d errors\n",
+			 data->name, errors);
+}
+
 typedef void (*test_type)(struct vec_data *);
 
 static const test_type tests[] = {
@@ -557,6 +627,7 @@ static const test_type tests[] = {
 	prctl_set_no_child,
 	prctl_set_for_child,
 	prctl_set_onexec,
+	prctl_set_all_vqs,
 };
 
 int main(void)
-- 
2.20.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests: arm64: Verify that all possible vector lengths are handled
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 13:08:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210917120855.13858-5-broonie@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210917120855.13858-1-broonie@kernel.org>

As part of the enumeration interface for setting vector lengths it is valid
to set vector lengths not supported in the system, these will be rounded to
a supported vector length and returned from the prctl(). Add a test which
exercises this for every valid vector length and makes sure that the return
value is as expected and that this is reflected in the actual system state.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c
index 9d6ac843e651..de11cd2f5d79 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c
@@ -540,6 +540,76 @@ static void prctl_set_onexec(struct vec_data *data)
 	file_write_integer(data->default_vl_file, data->default_vl);
 }
 
+/* For each VQ verify that setting via prctl() does the right thing */
+static void prctl_set_all_vqs(struct vec_data *data)
+{
+	int ret, vq, vl, new_vl;
+	int errors = 0;
+
+	for (vq = SVE_VQ_MIN; vq <= SVE_VQ_MAX; vq++) {
+		vl = sve_vl_from_vq(vq);
+
+		/* Attempt to set the VL */
+		ret = prctl(data->prctl_set, vl);
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			errors++;
+			ksft_print_msg("%s prctl set failed for %d: %d (%s)\n",
+				       data->name, vl,
+				       errno, strerror(errno));
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		new_vl = ret & PR_SVE_VL_LEN_MASK;
+
+		/* Check that we actually have the reported new VL */
+		if (data->rdvl() != new_vl) {
+			ksft_print_msg("Set %s VL %d but RDVL reports %d\n",
+				       data->name, new_vl, data->rdvl());
+			errors++;
+		}
+
+		/* Was that the VL we asked for? */
+		if (new_vl == vl)
+			continue;
+
+		/* Should round up to the minimum VL if below it */
+		if (vl < data->min_vl) {
+			if (new_vl != data->min_vl) {
+				ksft_print_msg("%s VL %d returned %d not minimum %d\n",
+					       data->name, vl, new_vl,
+					       data->min_vl);
+				errors++;
+			}
+
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		/* Should round down to maximum VL if above it */
+		if (vl > data->max_vl) {
+			if (new_vl != data->max_vl) {
+				ksft_print_msg("%s VL %d returned %d not maximum %d\n",
+					       data->name, vl, new_vl,
+					       data->max_vl);
+				errors++;
+			}
+
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		/* Otherwise we should've rounded down */
+		if (!(new_vl < vl)) {
+			ksft_print_msg("%s VL %d returned %d, did not round down\n",
+				       data->name, vl, new_vl);
+			errors++;
+
+			continue;
+		}
+	}
+
+	ksft_test_result(errors == 0, "%s prctl() set all VLs, %d errors\n",
+			 data->name, errors);
+}
+
 typedef void (*test_type)(struct vec_data *);
 
 static const test_type tests[] = {
@@ -557,6 +627,7 @@ static const test_type tests[] = {
 	prctl_set_no_child,
 	prctl_set_for_child,
 	prctl_set_onexec,
+	prctl_set_all_vqs,
 };
 
 int main(void)
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-17 12:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-17 12:08 [PATCH v2 0/4] selftests: arm64: vec-syscfg updates Mark Brown
2021-09-17 12:08 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-17 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] selftests: arm64: Fix printf() format mismatch in vec-syscfg Mark Brown
2021-09-17 12:08   ` Mark Brown
2021-09-17 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] selftests: arm64: Remove bogus error check on writing to files Mark Brown
2021-09-17 12:08   ` Mark Brown
2021-09-17 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] selftests: arm64: Fix and enable test for setting current VL in vec-syscfg Mark Brown
2021-09-17 12:08   ` Mark Brown
2021-09-17 12:08 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2021-09-17 12:08   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests: arm64: Verify that all possible vector lengths are handled Mark Brown
2021-09-17 12:26   ` misono.tomohiro
2021-09-17 12:26     ` misono.tomohiro
2021-09-29 14:31 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] selftests: arm64: vec-syscfg updates Will Deacon
2021-09-29 14:31   ` Will Deacon
2021-09-29 14:43   ` Mark Brown
2021-09-29 14:43     ` Mark Brown
2021-09-29 15:35     ` Will Deacon
2021-09-29 15:35       ` Will Deacon
2021-09-29 15:38       ` Mark Brown
2021-09-29 15:38         ` Mark Brown
2021-09-29 16:26       ` Shuah Khan
2021-09-29 16:26         ` Shuah Khan
2021-09-29 16:37         ` Mark Brown
2021-09-29 16:37           ` Mark Brown
2021-09-29 18:23           ` Shuah Khan
2021-09-29 18:23             ` Shuah Khan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210917120855.13858-5-broonie@kernel.org \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests: arm64: Verify that all possible vector lengths are handled' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.