From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54DE6C433EF for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 15:24:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36CF061164 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 15:24:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229730AbhIQP0K (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Sep 2021 11:26:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48334 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1344351AbhIQPY1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Sep 2021 11:24:27 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x62b.google.com (mail-pl1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 469E2C0613D3 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 08:22:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id w6so6414185pll.3 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 08:22:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=OS94uZTmA0qnszl1fwVMo+RQL+/vTVqvtH0x+p48wY0=; b=bRsPWtlhXzo4Tc/8or9LqnXhztTrk9NmxMapoTxWY0Ypjm1gL3iusGWCPx1hXm6hXA OnJWj3AfeV/AyOHx5exXC8jx9r5SrprlQOmDZ4fXNd1uKmS3VPuHRNL+hiI+Z8GF4XPi WK/2g61WY2v+O6shCYTiop8X+p9M/F/J96rA8m3g8Ut+moKVIOQoEjGLOImm2cOJAt7M f5crjbQisPGL3RZe3I/3BFsuR2bOn0bHvJN95jx9lTXBpcsUvy5TCJbdsn1eUZwqGKRR MXAOf8+zN8rXXGS6FxxD2Hn+G8vBOwu4E/XhZs8fEPSUn5SEgVF7Nbf60iAD89hmPRX4 Go7g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=OS94uZTmA0qnszl1fwVMo+RQL+/vTVqvtH0x+p48wY0=; b=cmWFW3skenVJ+KgUZ2T89jlKdRobizuMy64Bw0O91cyampELlJKqQv2e5kGUfmza9W DsVFcgtQ18e3EvEEYo6qEJsYegtWYqlnM+mVP1PIYQUO2Fiu3zrZUJx9Ocrkr9Z4yG1+ 06focRckEgL33VhLqrH6utIfiA3Q1m5tNxOIS5vkboERA0PXel/KzRgEO8xA9D88rCPN EXkhvHHWFDq2hJ0btIoDgYa/VnmQQ+Mz2G8+ZMiJqJuEIvqEZYM/wEIfsV1P5Qsv3ScV JPx1xiStWg/dk/IWBfnCaoTruwnXEkkN03jtP68roPgJd+nx4V+VmCWKTOOJ92tBrjDQ ZTOA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531FM5GupSoEyoPshqNCrLkBdc0l+nUdmIUT0fNbaUA98tt70RVA k2W6/lTDKFbhcKaEjIxZkPEFTA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwTfxqmzpmynstN+ueD82dE7pITyL8lRsfd5Z/m6O2J/WXNuzsrz1m0cTCWJw2yZBW048Tt5g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a3ca:b0:13c:a7be:1767 with SMTP id q10-20020a170902a3ca00b0013ca7be1767mr6481323plb.88.1631892159539; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 08:22:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p14s (S0106889e681aac74.cg.shawcable.net. [68.147.0.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 23sm6472340pfp.206.2021.09.17.08.22.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 17 Sep 2021 08:22:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 09:22:36 -0600 From: Mathieu Poirier To: Shengjiu Wang Cc: Shengjiu Wang , Ohad Ben Cohen , Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Sascha Hauer , Fabio Estevam , Daniel Baluta , NXP Linux Team , "open list:REMOTE PROCESSOR (REMOTEPROC) SUBSYSTEM" , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: Add remoteproc driver for DSP on i.MX Message-ID: <20210917152236.GA1878943@p14s> References: <1631092255-25150-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com> <1631092255-25150-4-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com> <20210915161624.GA1770838@p14s> <20210916165957.GA1825273@p14s> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 05:44:44PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 1:20 PM Shengjiu Wang wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 1:00 AM Mathieu Poirier > > wrote: > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > +/** > > > > > > + * imx_dsp_rproc_elf_load_segments() - load firmware segments to memory > > > > > > + * @rproc: remote processor which will be booted using these fw segments > > > > > > + * @fw: the ELF firmware image > > > > > > + * > > > > > > + * This function specially checks if memsz is zero or not, otherwise it > > > > > > + * is mostly same as rproc_elf_load_segments(). > > > > > > + */ > > > > > > +static int imx_dsp_rproc_elf_load_segments(struct rproc *rproc, > > > > > > + const struct firmware *fw) > > > > > > +{ > > > > > > + struct device *dev = &rproc->dev; > > > > > > + u8 class = fw_elf_get_class(fw); > > > > > > + u32 elf_phdr_get_size = elf_size_of_phdr(class); > > > > > > + const u8 *elf_data = fw->data; > > > > > > + const void *ehdr, *phdr; > > > > > > + int i, ret = 0; > > > > > > + u16 phnum; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + ehdr = elf_data; > > > > > > + phnum = elf_hdr_get_e_phnum(class, ehdr); > > > > > > + phdr = elf_data + elf_hdr_get_e_phoff(class, ehdr); > > > > > > + > > > > > > + /* go through the available ELF segments */ > > > > > > + for (i = 0; i < phnum; i++, phdr += elf_phdr_get_size) { > > > > > > + u64 da = elf_phdr_get_p_paddr(class, phdr); > > > > > > + u64 memsz = elf_phdr_get_p_memsz(class, phdr); > > > > > > + u64 filesz = elf_phdr_get_p_filesz(class, phdr); > > > > > > + u64 offset = elf_phdr_get_p_offset(class, phdr); > > > > > > + u32 type = elf_phdr_get_p_type(class, phdr); > > > > > > + void *ptr; > > > > > > + bool is_iomem; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + if (type != PT_LOAD || !memsz) > > > > > > > > > > You did a really good job with adding comments but this part is undocumented... > > > > > If I read this correctly you need to check for !memsz because some part of > > > > > the program segment may have a header but its memsz is zero, in which case it can > > > > > be safely skipped. So why is that segment in the image to start with, and why > > > > > is it marked PT_LOAD if it is not needed? This is very puzzling... > > > > > > > > Actually I have added comments in the header of this function. > > > > > > Indeed there is a mention of memsz in the function's header but it doesn't > > > mention _why_ this is needed, and that is what I'm looking for. > > > > > > > > > > > memsz= 0 with PT_LOAD issue, I have asked the toolchain's vendor, > > > > they said that this case is allowed by elf spec... > > > > > > > > And in the "pru_rproc.c" and "mtk_scp.c", seems they met same problem > > > > they also check the filesz in their internal xxx_elf_load_segments() function. > > > > > > In both cases they are skipping PT_LOAD sections where "filesz" is '0', which > > > makes sense because we don't know how many bytes to copy. But here you are > > > skipping over a PT_LOAD section with a potentially valid filesz, and that is the > > > part I don't understand. > > > > Ok, I can use filesz instead. For my case, filesz = memsz = 0, > > it is the same result I want. If that is the case then rproc_elf_load_segments() should work, i.e it won't copy anything. If rproc_elf_load_segments() doesn't work for you then there are corner cases you haven't told me about. > > > > The reason why I use "memsz '' is because there is "if (filesz > memsz) " > > check after this, if memsz is zero, then "filesz" should be zero too, other > > values are not allowed. > > But I still think checking "!memsz" is better than filesz, because > memsz > filesz is allowed (filesz = 0), the code below can be executed. > filesz > memsz is not allowed. > > What do you think? I don't see a need to add a custom implementation for things that _may_ happen. If using the default rproc_elf_load_segments() works than go with that. We can deal with problems if/when there is a need for it. > > Best regards > Wang shengjiu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + continue; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + dev_dbg(dev, "phdr: type %d da 0x%llx memsz 0x%llx filesz 0x%llx\n", > > > > > > + type, da, memsz, filesz); > > > > > > + > > > > > > + if (filesz > memsz) { > > > > > > + dev_err(dev, "bad phdr filesz 0x%llx memsz 0x%llx\n", > > > > > > + filesz, memsz); > > > > > > + ret = -EINVAL; > > > > > > + break; > > > > > > + } > > > > > > + > > > > > > + if (offset + filesz > fw->size) { > > > > > > + dev_err(dev, "truncated fw: need 0x%llx avail 0x%zx\n", > > > > > > + offset + filesz, fw->size); > > > > > > + ret = -EINVAL; > > > > > > + break; > > > > > > + } > > > > > > + > > > > > > + if (!rproc_u64_fit_in_size_t(memsz)) { > > > > > > + dev_err(dev, "size (%llx) does not fit in size_t type\n", > > > > > > + memsz); > > > > > > + ret = -EOVERFLOW; > > > > > > + break; > > > > > > + } > > > > > > + > > > > > > + /* grab the kernel address for this device address */ > > > > > > + ptr = rproc_da_to_va(rproc, da, memsz, &is_iomem); > > > > > > > > > > rproc_da_to_va(rproc, da, memsz, NULL); > > > > > > > > yes, will update it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > More comments to follow later today or tomorrow. > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > Best regards > > > > Wang Shengjiu From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90133C433EF for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 15:24:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56D1060E08 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 15:24:11 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 56D1060E08 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=UBtEe2v+AEmDmiwlsdawEFTve0E0WHNpPlh7VIvymnk=; b=1qD27nOxdwtg9D OADnv2eZn/Ucj36vpX7Vr4rFdfUwPXq3EgJAUQg289dv98ub6viRqjIOBPaSpIuUO6dAVU78xSj25 nH30k5aOTNyXxy9icRHwGTW00kns+u2M+T7B0nBq5kVHOse9C5Z/IArq/sFzo1PTv7gmVDz5BNK8x 7/vRM2+WH1HBxTvfd1BQ8Y++x7Lw6QuhrMmv1UuzKHpIPyEUZS6z+eqVKRRjEz5uvmrcmVJdWrhBj ZgwZXc5Tx4SQNOuey+LRwmOmTwrvts6Cvvn0Q2xq8si+t3sKWivPLJZeXYdzGmnIaqlRPMLdgjwd7 Qr+jhxtKZkQpSOKO0kkg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mRFhO-00EXUO-2v; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 15:22:46 +0000 Received: from mail-pj1-x102a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::102a]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mRFhJ-00EXU3-S8 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 15:22:43 +0000 Received: by mail-pj1-x102a.google.com with SMTP id k23-20020a17090a591700b001976d2db364so7635536pji.2 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 08:22:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=OS94uZTmA0qnszl1fwVMo+RQL+/vTVqvtH0x+p48wY0=; b=bRsPWtlhXzo4Tc/8or9LqnXhztTrk9NmxMapoTxWY0Ypjm1gL3iusGWCPx1hXm6hXA OnJWj3AfeV/AyOHx5exXC8jx9r5SrprlQOmDZ4fXNd1uKmS3VPuHRNL+hiI+Z8GF4XPi WK/2g61WY2v+O6shCYTiop8X+p9M/F/J96rA8m3g8Ut+moKVIOQoEjGLOImm2cOJAt7M f5crjbQisPGL3RZe3I/3BFsuR2bOn0bHvJN95jx9lTXBpcsUvy5TCJbdsn1eUZwqGKRR MXAOf8+zN8rXXGS6FxxD2Hn+G8vBOwu4E/XhZs8fEPSUn5SEgVF7Nbf60iAD89hmPRX4 Go7g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=OS94uZTmA0qnszl1fwVMo+RQL+/vTVqvtH0x+p48wY0=; b=kPFIXUnUcZ+u1WoqiApPM6adYsqBEDeaJmSCOyc5f+41uRo30OmDlVO16cDen9lQkV 4SrXo9t4GBh3R3Yw0Lcg7IQmssjRCLIzhYp2DUAqltG4HHut63dJHwC82Fbdccmr8cLS zxcEKZPCKAqJdxYMi9bZOQqLfgeWgIk8DzuPbbwGPUCMacu0MerrCwWvgDiy+FSmc8SS uh1epbbN2QxT3Wb26WbVe3K9XBBybYJr0eDUBXyGD6igXrF9RLQC0i0QvcaMhRq0FEy1 tHAQJdOLufC7E6C2AGGzh4HzJjiUX8d5Q58bY3iQSBh0gwxQmGKImLjijiPXQ6jrp7jK kbrg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530H3XKY67upbInt7higL4puvYEZmBWp1WTqr7PynQEp2AdS3Spo TKOtCW1kG1gpo5ZQHxME7JGl3Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwTfxqmzpmynstN+ueD82dE7pITyL8lRsfd5Z/m6O2J/WXNuzsrz1m0cTCWJw2yZBW048Tt5g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a3ca:b0:13c:a7be:1767 with SMTP id q10-20020a170902a3ca00b0013ca7be1767mr6481323plb.88.1631892159539; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 08:22:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p14s (S0106889e681aac74.cg.shawcable.net. [68.147.0.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 23sm6472340pfp.206.2021.09.17.08.22.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 17 Sep 2021 08:22:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 09:22:36 -0600 From: Mathieu Poirier To: Shengjiu Wang Cc: Shengjiu Wang , Ohad Ben Cohen , Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Sascha Hauer , Fabio Estevam , Daniel Baluta , NXP Linux Team , "open list:REMOTE PROCESSOR (REMOTEPROC) SUBSYSTEM" , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: Add remoteproc driver for DSP on i.MX Message-ID: <20210917152236.GA1878943@p14s> References: <1631092255-25150-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com> <1631092255-25150-4-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com> <20210915161624.GA1770838@p14s> <20210916165957.GA1825273@p14s> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210917_082242_004820_87564F32 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 45.95 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 05:44:44PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 1:20 PM Shengjiu Wang wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 1:00 AM Mathieu Poirier > > wrote: > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > +/** > > > > > > + * imx_dsp_rproc_elf_load_segments() - load firmware segments to memory > > > > > > + * @rproc: remote processor which will be booted using these fw segments > > > > > > + * @fw: the ELF firmware image > > > > > > + * > > > > > > + * This function specially checks if memsz is zero or not, otherwise it > > > > > > + * is mostly same as rproc_elf_load_segments(). > > > > > > + */ > > > > > > +static int imx_dsp_rproc_elf_load_segments(struct rproc *rproc, > > > > > > + const struct firmware *fw) > > > > > > +{ > > > > > > + struct device *dev = &rproc->dev; > > > > > > + u8 class = fw_elf_get_class(fw); > > > > > > + u32 elf_phdr_get_size = elf_size_of_phdr(class); > > > > > > + const u8 *elf_data = fw->data; > > > > > > + const void *ehdr, *phdr; > > > > > > + int i, ret = 0; > > > > > > + u16 phnum; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + ehdr = elf_data; > > > > > > + phnum = elf_hdr_get_e_phnum(class, ehdr); > > > > > > + phdr = elf_data + elf_hdr_get_e_phoff(class, ehdr); > > > > > > + > > > > > > + /* go through the available ELF segments */ > > > > > > + for (i = 0; i < phnum; i++, phdr += elf_phdr_get_size) { > > > > > > + u64 da = elf_phdr_get_p_paddr(class, phdr); > > > > > > + u64 memsz = elf_phdr_get_p_memsz(class, phdr); > > > > > > + u64 filesz = elf_phdr_get_p_filesz(class, phdr); > > > > > > + u64 offset = elf_phdr_get_p_offset(class, phdr); > > > > > > + u32 type = elf_phdr_get_p_type(class, phdr); > > > > > > + void *ptr; > > > > > > + bool is_iomem; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + if (type != PT_LOAD || !memsz) > > > > > > > > > > You did a really good job with adding comments but this part is undocumented... > > > > > If I read this correctly you need to check for !memsz because some part of > > > > > the program segment may have a header but its memsz is zero, in which case it can > > > > > be safely skipped. So why is that segment in the image to start with, and why > > > > > is it marked PT_LOAD if it is not needed? This is very puzzling... > > > > > > > > Actually I have added comments in the header of this function. > > > > > > Indeed there is a mention of memsz in the function's header but it doesn't > > > mention _why_ this is needed, and that is what I'm looking for. > > > > > > > > > > > memsz= 0 with PT_LOAD issue, I have asked the toolchain's vendor, > > > > they said that this case is allowed by elf spec... > > > > > > > > And in the "pru_rproc.c" and "mtk_scp.c", seems they met same problem > > > > they also check the filesz in their internal xxx_elf_load_segments() function. > > > > > > In both cases they are skipping PT_LOAD sections where "filesz" is '0', which > > > makes sense because we don't know how many bytes to copy. But here you are > > > skipping over a PT_LOAD section with a potentially valid filesz, and that is the > > > part I don't understand. > > > > Ok, I can use filesz instead. For my case, filesz = memsz = 0, > > it is the same result I want. If that is the case then rproc_elf_load_segments() should work, i.e it won't copy anything. If rproc_elf_load_segments() doesn't work for you then there are corner cases you haven't told me about. > > > > The reason why I use "memsz '' is because there is "if (filesz > memsz) " > > check after this, if memsz is zero, then "filesz" should be zero too, other > > values are not allowed. > > But I still think checking "!memsz" is better than filesz, because > memsz > filesz is allowed (filesz = 0), the code below can be executed. > filesz > memsz is not allowed. > > What do you think? I don't see a need to add a custom implementation for things that _may_ happen. If using the default rproc_elf_load_segments() works than go with that. We can deal with problems if/when there is a need for it. > > Best regards > Wang shengjiu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + continue; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + dev_dbg(dev, "phdr: type %d da 0x%llx memsz 0x%llx filesz 0x%llx\n", > > > > > > + type, da, memsz, filesz); > > > > > > + > > > > > > + if (filesz > memsz) { > > > > > > + dev_err(dev, "bad phdr filesz 0x%llx memsz 0x%llx\n", > > > > > > + filesz, memsz); > > > > > > + ret = -EINVAL; > > > > > > + break; > > > > > > + } > > > > > > + > > > > > > + if (offset + filesz > fw->size) { > > > > > > + dev_err(dev, "truncated fw: need 0x%llx avail 0x%zx\n", > > > > > > + offset + filesz, fw->size); > > > > > > + ret = -EINVAL; > > > > > > + break; > > > > > > + } > > > > > > + > > > > > > + if (!rproc_u64_fit_in_size_t(memsz)) { > > > > > > + dev_err(dev, "size (%llx) does not fit in size_t type\n", > > > > > > + memsz); > > > > > > + ret = -EOVERFLOW; > > > > > > + break; > > > > > > + } > > > > > > + > > > > > > + /* grab the kernel address for this device address */ > > > > > > + ptr = rproc_da_to_va(rproc, da, memsz, &is_iomem); > > > > > > > > > > rproc_da_to_va(rproc, da, memsz, NULL); > > > > > > > > yes, will update it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > More comments to follow later today or tomorrow. > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > Best regards > > > > Wang Shengjiu _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel