All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@baidu.com>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Remove the unused pci wrappers
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2021 10:41:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210926024106.GA88@LAPTOP-UKSR4ENP.internal.baidu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3bf6cee5-a55b-5a6e-26d5-35002b36a2d2@wanadoo.fr>

On 25 9月 21 17:14:05, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 25/09/2021 à 15:52, Cai Huoqing a écrit :
> > The wrappers in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h should go away,
> > so remove the unused pci wrappers.
> > Prefer using dma_xxx() instead of the pci wrappers pci_xxx().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@baidu.com>
> > ---
> >   include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h | 27 ---------------------------
> >   1 file changed, 27 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h b/include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h
> > index 249d4d7fbf18..33b316f38e1d 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h
> > @@ -20,13 +20,6 @@ pci_alloc_consistent(struct pci_dev *hwdev, size_t size,
> >   	return dma_alloc_coherent(&hwdev->dev, size, dma_handle, GFP_ATOMIC);
> >   }
> > -static inline void *
> > -pci_zalloc_consistent(struct pci_dev *hwdev, size_t size,
> > -		      dma_addr_t *dma_handle)
> > -{
> > -	return dma_alloc_coherent(&hwdev->dev, size, dma_handle, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > -}
> > -
> >   static inline void
> >   pci_free_consistent(struct pci_dev *hwdev, size_t size,
> >   		    void *vaddr, dma_addr_t dma_handle)
> > @@ -89,26 +82,6 @@ pci_dma_sync_single_for_device(struct pci_dev *hwdev, dma_addr_t dma_handle,
> >   	dma_sync_single_for_device(&hwdev->dev, dma_handle, size, (enum dma_data_direction)direction);
> >   }
> > -static inline void
> > -pci_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct pci_dev *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
> > -		int nelems, int direction)
> > -{
> > -	dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(&hwdev->dev, sg, nelems, (enum dma_data_direction)direction);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static inline void
> > -pci_dma_sync_sg_for_device(struct pci_dev *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
> > -		int nelems, int direction)
> > -{
> > -	dma_sync_sg_for_device(&hwdev->dev, sg, nelems, (enum dma_data_direction)direction);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static inline int
> > -pci_dma_mapping_error(struct pci_dev *pdev, dma_addr_t dma_addr)
> > -{
> > -	return dma_mapping_error(&pdev->dev, dma_addr);
> > -}
> > -
> >   #ifdef CONFIG_PCI
> >   static inline int pci_set_dma_mask(struct pci_dev *dev, u64 mask)
> >   {
> > 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm not sure that this step is needed.
> The whole pci-dma-compat.h is close to be obsolete. So axing just a part of
> it now is not that really useful.
Thanks for your feedback.

If someone reuse these wrappers, that will not be checked by checkpatch.pl.
And I also will not add check condition to checkpatch.pl, because the wrappers
in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h will go away soon.

Removing these API helps driver owner to avoid reusing these obsolete wrappers
without reviwing it manually, only works before pci-dma-compat.h is droped.

Thanks
Cai

> 
> After many patches, there is now just a few users of this deprecated API.
> All steps to finalize the job have already been posted [1] and a plan has
> been proposed by Arnd Bergmann to have the remaining ones merged in the tree
> [2]
it maybe cost serval weeks before all subtrees merge to linux-next.
> 
> Some of the message/fusion patches have been re-sent yesterday and today to
> the scsi maintainer in order to have them merged.
> 
> BTW, Cai Huoqing, thanks a lot for taking care and proposing the needed
> clean-ups in comments and log messages.
> Looking at it was the next item of my to-do list, but I'm really pleased to
> get some help here to finalize the job once and for all.
> 
> CJ
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/kernel-janitors/4cb6f731-7f4d-21d0-c88d-37664ea35002@wanadoo.fr/
> 
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/kernel-janitors/CAK8P3a2CBvw_GP372R+p8f4_pa82sMuQ5iHk4Nb2dJCzm_Fivw@mail.gmail.com/
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2021-09-26  2:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-25 13:52 [PATCH] PCI: Remove the unused pci wrappers Cai Huoqing
2021-09-25 15:14 ` Christophe JAILLET
2021-09-26  2:41   ` Cai Huoqing [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210926024106.GA88@LAPTOP-UKSR4ENP.internal.baidu.com \
    --to=caihuoqing@baidu.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.