All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] block: drain file system I/O on del_gendisk
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 14:04:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210927120441.GA25223@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YUwhPy1J8lzHQF77@T590>

On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 02:39:59PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > After blk_mq_unfreeze_queue() returns, blk_try_enter_queue() will return
> > > true, so new FS I/O from opened bdev still won't be blocked, right?
> > 
> > It won't be blocked by blk_mq_unfreeze_queue, but because the capacity
> > is set to 0 it still won't make it to the driver.
> 
> One bio could be made & checked before set_capacity(0), then is
> submitted after blk_mq_unfreeze_queue() returns.
> 
> blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait() doesn't always imply RCU grace period, for
> example, the .q_usage_counter may have been in atomic mode before
> calling blk_queue_start_drain() & blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait().

True, but this isn't really a new issue as we never had proper quiesce
behavior.  I have a bunch of ideas of how to make this actually solid,
but none of them looks like 5.15 material.


  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-27 12:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-22 17:22 tear down file system I/O in del_gendisk v2 Christoph Hellwig
2021-09-22 17:22 ` [PATCH 1/4] block: factor out a blk_try_enter_queue helper Christoph Hellwig
2021-09-22 17:22 ` [PATCH 2/4] block: split bio_queue_enter from blk_queue_enter Christoph Hellwig
2021-09-22 17:22 ` [PATCH 3/4] block: drain file system I/O on del_gendisk Christoph Hellwig
2021-09-23  1:34   ` Ming Lei
2021-09-23  5:27     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-09-23  6:39       ` Ming Lei
2021-09-27 12:04         ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-09-27 14:32           ` Ming Lei
2021-09-23  6:21   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-09-22 17:22 ` [PATCH 4/4] block: keep q_usage_counter in atomic mode after del_gendisk Christoph Hellwig
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-09-20 11:24 tear down file system I/O in del_gendisk Christoph Hellwig
2021-09-20 11:24 ` [PATCH 3/4] block: drain file system I/O on del_gendisk Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210927120441.GA25223@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.