From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 06/11] rcu/nocb: Check a stable offloaded state to manipulate qlen_last_fqs_check
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:10:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210929221012.228270-7-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210929221012.228270-1-frederic@kernel.org>
It's unclear why rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check is updated only on offloaded
rdp. Also rcu_core() and NOCB kthreads can run concurrently, should
we do the update on both cases? Probably not because one can erase the
initialized value of the other.
For now shutdown the RT warning due to volatile offloading state check
and wait for a debate after this half-baked patch.
Reported-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 73971b8024d8..b1fc6e498d90 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2508,7 +2508,7 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data *rdp)
trace_rcu_batch_start(rcu_state.name,
rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&rdp->cblist), bl);
rcu_segcblist_extract_done_cbs(&rdp->cblist, &rcl);
- if (offloaded)
+ if (rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp))
rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check = rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&rdp->cblist);
trace_rcu_segcb_stats(&rdp->cblist, TPS("SegCbDequeued"));
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-29 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-29 22:10 [PATCH 00/11] rcu: Make rcu_core() safe in PREEMPT_RT with NOCB + a few other fixes Frederic Weisbecker
2021-09-29 22:10 ` [PATCH 01/11] rcu/nocb: Make local rcu_nocb_lock_irqsave() safe against concurrent deoffloading Frederic Weisbecker
2021-09-29 22:10 ` [PATCH 02/11] rcu/nocb: Prepare state machine for a new step Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-01 17:48 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-10-04 11:35 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-09-29 22:10 ` [PATCH 03/11] rcu/nocb: Invoke rcu_core() at the start of deoffloading Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-01 17:50 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-10-04 12:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-09-29 22:10 ` [PATCH 04/11] rcu/nocb: Make rcu_core() callbacks acceleration preempt-safe Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-01 17:50 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-09-29 22:10 ` [PATCH 05/11] rcu/nocb: Make rcu_core() callbacks acceleration (de-)offloading safe Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-01 17:50 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-10-04 13:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-09-29 22:10 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2021-09-29 22:10 ` [PATCH 07/11] rcu/nocb: Use appropriate rcu_nocb_lock_irqsave() Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-01 17:50 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-10-04 13:33 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-09-29 22:10 ` [PATCH 08/11] rcu/nocb: Limit number of softirq callbacks only on softirq Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-01 17:51 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-10-04 13:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-05 20:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-09-29 22:10 ` [PATCH 09/11] rcu: Fix callbacks processing time limit retaining cond_resched() Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-01 17:51 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-09-29 22:10 ` [PATCH 10/11] rcu: Apply callbacks processing time limit only on softirq Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-01 17:51 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-10-04 13:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-06 15:12 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-10-07 0:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-09-29 22:10 ` [PATCH 11/11] rcu/nocb: Don't invoke local rcu core on callback overload from nocb kthread Frederic Weisbecker
2021-09-30 15:37 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-10-11 12:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-10-01 17:47 ` [PATCH 00/11] rcu: Make rcu_core() safe in PREEMPT_RT with NOCB + a few other fixes Valentin Schneider
2021-10-08 14:03 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-10-08 15:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-10-06 15:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-10-07 8:49 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-10-07 19:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210929221012.228270-7-frederic@kernel.org \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.