From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qk1-f182.google.com (mail-qk1-f182.google.com [209.85.222.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB32A3FFB for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 12:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk1-f182.google.com with SMTP id x12so2366439qkf.9 for ; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 05:53:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Je2G4ojRNzWlj1XN8zUMgdVFvSF7NB/M0qZD7yYk1FY=; b=QEzWpMwWAQiLSFYU1VK5w2+L1q5iceZ5TvkHsS/nwUkXTEBMjW/ThueMblmcZqcZi9 necA7APwgjxJzDGjbxm5LNO2x+rIMF0c3uPEN+dZJF+Gyto1MznJA51Wf266fLFxJ/FP VNVBNdcTWAkqiGGYc1ueKYDq71TpHcu+r6u9w= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Je2G4ojRNzWlj1XN8zUMgdVFvSF7NB/M0qZD7yYk1FY=; b=5PNTYHemEC5PBWgE2b5hIga+krD+w0tIrbJ2aeBweOmYijmnFPL9N2v2Hc824wKHG4 wEnjo2TXDW71wm5aPXfDgHsstDEGX61bev7Jx2f8uWRLBD2l73NrBBOgcai2YubzBBKQ jLEMItuBMzCDSNXddrvOCl3ANpelmFPyxzQ9rfrQ5FWMCkUI7RNItKD6LOhOnzU8+bSl UCpefK0ZyKXcPv6lh/WjZhCEuJ5JwLrHjYgsXdzfdLIPAO88VFw/sNcV04npTGerzSnS 0in7Ge2veHeNsb55o/fZ43npVlWwOIuCHNtvAPgumWCHXD963D7yXUS37369ZP03v+FH N5Fg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531wzVJTn/EVYFWYTnitnoIaBWb7J0frWTNBUqhomEZW/XBzQRGV zLC++cD5ev14V/6h5CIVp89qv0cRWHS9UQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxspxVe7MVSIjPFofAkeZbPkq9n8ybriqT5AuSIbsY5ElHdcZwFuAadEp4D0TDUxOTMyHOarw== X-Received: by 2002:a37:444d:: with SMTP id r74mr14353526qka.405.1633438409745; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 05:53:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from meerkat.local (bras-base-mtrlpq5031w-grc-32-216-209-220-181.dsl.bell.ca. [216.209.220.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h27sm1801519qtu.11.2021.10.05.05.53.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 05 Oct 2021 05:53:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 08:53:28 -0400 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: Lee Jones Cc: Rob Herring , users@linux.kernel.org, tools@linux.kernel.org Subject: Re: Acked-by missed when applying Message-ID: <20211005125328.najo7q5f7pwxdrfy@meerkat.local> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: tools@linux.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 01:48:04PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > Can you think of a reason why `b4` missed Greg's Ack here? > > > > Because you applied the first v2 patch, not the second v2 threaded to > > the 1st one that Greg acked. > > Not sure I understand. > > This is the thread of the patch I merged: > > https://i.imgur.com/k4hD9kO.png > > Greg's Ack is located in the 5th message down. If you look at the thread overview, you'll notice that there are two messages with identical subjects, sent 3 weeks apart: 2021-09-02 12:47 [PATCH v2] mfd: hi6421-spmi-pmic: cleanup drvdata and 2021-09-28 6:58 [PATCH v2] mfd: hi6421-spmi-pmic: cleanup drvdata As far as b4 is treating things internally, the second v2 (from Sep 28) starts a new thread, so any trailers sent to the Sep-02 version will not apply to the Sep-29 version and vice versa. -K