From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk1-x72e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::72e]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mYCmg-00FQ1U-9n for linux-um@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 19:40:59 +0000 Received: by mail-qk1-x72e.google.com with SMTP id l7so3803730qkk.0 for ; Wed, 06 Oct 2021 12:40:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from crass-HP-ZBook-15-G2 ([37.218.244.251]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f83sm12141055qke.79.2021.10.06.12.40.54 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 06 Oct 2021 12:40:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 14:40:48 -0500 From: Glenn Washburn Subject: Is exec still very slow compared to other aspects of UML? Message-ID: <20211006144048.6a42a958@crass-HP-ZBook-15-G2> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: development@efficientek.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-um" Errors-To: linux-um-bounces+geert=linux-m68k.org@lists.infradead.org To: linux-um@lists.infradead.org Hi all, After reading this blog post[1], which I think is at least several years old, I'm left wondering how much of an issue is the exec speed. Or alternatively, could I see a significant speed up by reducing the number of exec calls. Any one have opinions on this? Glenn [1] https://www.kot-begemot.co.uk/node/15 _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um