From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF0BC433EF for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 09:08:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4440A610A0 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 09:08:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240413AbhJGJKI (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2021 05:10:08 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:35572 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231797AbhJGJKF (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2021 05:10:05 -0400 Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 11:08:10 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1633597691; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=cQSxA5BrKSmT8ugQ5tZPDqCHZNXyYi1pLPw9fmt61R8=; b=L7HcplSHp9acFF30+yftG8Hbkj6gMmaKZ/oqbz2lspZzB8v+yVQZs8jwzlzQhr5m0CCmZ8 ELOTUP5tBg8d5nBNZs7TNs5Kkyboxvwz5QlR5Z6z6Lia3wKD+Om+C2XnsHp/V6GdtdQ+qG 4H/PfgHHbe4ltRygQHMd84IBrHnsDToanQ6K36DGRNJVNo6zuu82tw5wPJ+JcsVc7A7SfF ArrJH7boZwOUjnZ2NXfQ3kCduMtcV7bmriCyek7l04k987iAr/xmgASfQNZUN8t3WFz6OS K3ieSP5rHqBKVijRlX3TcPWcApPtx+4rEFVrXFMl/jcCPnvMgxn7h64pJbIYrw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1633597691; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=cQSxA5BrKSmT8ugQ5tZPDqCHZNXyYi1pLPw9fmt61R8=; b=hNvWqktYGFMs6n/8xolagZJiIEfd6GjeE34ctll7hzXk/ikaFUMOfuGkxxFSFWdeqv1Ink rDZhfxrhI71rFmAQ== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] irq_work: Handle some irq_work in a per-CPU thread on PREEMPT_RT Message-ID: <20211007090810.7jbxj7giedmqlzyl@linutronix.de> References: <20211006111852.1514359-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20211006111852.1514359-4-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20211007085023.GP174703@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20211007085023.GP174703@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021-10-07 10:50:23 [+0200], Peter Zijlstra wrote: > How's this instead? Yeah. The last minute move-up of the llist_add() was=E2=80=A6 > (work rename due to there already being a percpu variable of that same > name on a number or archs, per 0day) Let me grab that, add that ifdef smp and repost 3/4. Sebastian