From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qk1-f182.google.com (mail-qk1-f182.google.com [209.85.222.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4C5E2C80 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 17:38:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk1-f182.google.com with SMTP id p4so6773850qki.3 for ; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 10:38:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=0b5K6CHksAQREdd4KXJtzbRpoWGa8fxbeBueOTEc7wE=; b=eSYR0wPHzOkCeFzqO1djjGzA3EgPRBjKHnUep6wjJYlda1ZONuuZjIlBaY8sO5UuKE ZSky8WFkSdMvEehohwQTOrnXhL4r2XOYAHZo3IdL/wkAiJu17wEFeq5lYfIz5CiXrDVX g5R2ZJQliTbqVk4Piyvuhhcjhj4BwIqbggGxY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=0b5K6CHksAQREdd4KXJtzbRpoWGa8fxbeBueOTEc7wE=; b=DE5NiZPTegmHB8pdDe4UrUn1dEnxTL2S/jO7tosmgC/OaDJScVLXL81vAcTMl5ndxr t6ZyS2mU29e/iMrTbP+0enaKjsTacBtKQ4J9lxgU+Y07r4WWv0S8brUtCDxm0mLm5Pzf Rdirt0ReUU/t9Biw/at2H0fOYieQ8/jVqx76iEixpyGEQ+tMN4zUnb3t1ZbsVfw4AX50 jIU/89VQwngYU8ujXQoJiH2pXMW5wTrhOmK3Q1W8hJy0CngDkXwa7orDQNHDa9CK7Lpv QjKWMhpGHRKjPOW9Mt45r0vZZDfyg0adnxf3zWvp86l5HhKEtAxAhpiHcNH0OXCIkcqk XH/A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Z/U+BLQgda0/gGRDMsm0gpXPzlRARqJXf6CbvqItrU7psDsQI yZibDDu7U8+G3B1pZZoScuz9ABjGoTRIEg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyIhj0vdfOX5HaqF9ZtkV2/dRpsDiTQZxiUBRGQrHo2A226ZcuSWVklncIQOU6bsNtoOwCNnQ== X-Received: by 2002:a37:c12:: with SMTP id 18mr4424969qkm.12.1633628335754; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 10:38:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from meerkat.local (bras-base-mtrlpq5031w-grc-32-216-209-220-181.dsl.bell.ca. [216.209.220.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d17sm29498qte.0.2021.10.07.10.38.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 07 Oct 2021 10:38:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2021 13:38:54 -0400 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: tools@linux.kernel.org Subject: b4 and git am -s errors (was Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: docs: switch away from list-table) Message-ID: <20211007173854.v6wy6cpekbv3lf2i@meerkat.local> References: <20210902220854.198850-1-corbet@lwn.net> <20210902220854.198850-2-corbet@lwn.net> <20210916095455.GE10610@quack2.suse.cz> <877df9tt5d.fsf@meer.lwn.net> <87wnmozy9i.fsf@meer.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: tools@linux.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wnmozy9i.fsf@meer.lwn.net> On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 08:48:41AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Ah...I learned something today. If you try to apply your own patches > with "git am -s" (via b4 to lazily grab Jan's Reviewed-by tags), it > fails, complaining about duplicate signoff lines. I'd failed to notice > that before. I've *really* applied them this time (and tweaked my > scripts :). Butting myself into the conversation in a totally non-creepy all-seeing way. Was that when using "git am" directly, or via "b4 shazam"? -K