From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next 0/4] devlink: add dry run support for flash update
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 18:29:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211008182938.0dea0600@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR11MB50899080E3A33882F9630C98D6B39@CO1PR11MB5089.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 00:32:49 +0000 Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> Ah.. I see how its done. It's passed as the argument so you don't
> see a direct comparison which makes it look like there isn't one...
> Feels like there could probably be a better abstraction that was more
> readable here...
>
> Anyways. I'll confirm what happens on the kernel that doesn't have
> the attribute defined at all.
>
> I wonder if the thing I saw differently was because the attribute
> *was* known but wasn't in policy. I.e. because it was defined it was
> validated....
>
> Yep, I confirm that on a kernel without the DRY_RUN flag that it
> would allow the run because we aren't being strict.
>
> I am guessing that we can't convert devlink over to strict validation?
I think the current best practice is not to opt-in commands which
started out as non-strict into strict validation. That said opting
it in for MAXTYPE validation seems reasonable to me.
Alternatively, as I said, you can just check the max attr for the
family in user space. CTRL_CMD_GETFAMILY returns it as part of family
info (CTRL_ATTR_MAXATTR). We can make user space do the rejecting.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-09 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-08 10:41 Jacob Keller
2021-10-08 10:41 ` [net-next 1/4] ice: move and rename ice_check_for_pending_update Jacob Keller
2021-10-08 10:41 ` [net-next 2/4] ice: move ice_devlink_flash_update and merge with ice_flash_pldm_image Jacob Keller
2021-10-08 10:41 ` [net-next 3/4] devlink: add dry run attribute to flash update Jacob Keller
2021-10-08 10:41 ` [net-next 4/4] ice: support dry run of a flash update to validate firmware file Jacob Keller
2021-10-08 12:37 ` [net-next 0/4] devlink: add dry run support for flash update Jiri Pirko
2021-10-08 18:21 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-10-08 21:43 ` Keller, Jacob E
2021-10-08 22:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-10-08 23:58 ` Keller, Jacob E
2021-10-09 0:17 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-10-09 0:32 ` Keller, Jacob E
2021-10-09 1:29 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-04-25 23:05 ` Jacob Keller
2021-10-11 8:21 ` Keller, Jacob E
2021-10-11 23:21 ` Keller, Jacob E
2021-10-08 21:42 ` Keller, Jacob E
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211008182938.0dea0600@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [net-next 0/4] devlink: add dry run support for flash update' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.