From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> To: rjw@rjwysocki.net, oleg@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, mgorman@suse.de, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, tj@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v3 0/6] Freezer rewrite Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2021 12:07:54 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20211009100754.690769957@infradead.org> (raw) Hi all, This is the by now familiar rewrite of the freezer, but with yet another attempt at getting the special blocked states (STOPPED/TRACED) right. Currently it is already possible to tell if a task should be STOPPED from looking at p->jobctl, the same idea is extended to TRACED and p->ptrace. But treating p->jobctl/p->ptrace as canonical state, the blocked state can be (hopefully correctly this time) reconstructed from it at all times. Specifically, if a TRACED task was woken by the tracer, while the tracee was FROZEN, the p->ptrace state will have been updated, and the thaw operation will result in the wakeup. Oleg, if you can please try and shoot holes in it again? :-)
next reply other threads:[~2021-10-09 10:20 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-10-09 10:07 Peter Zijlstra [this message] 2021-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] freezer: Have {,un}lock_system_sleep() save/restore flags Peter Zijlstra 2021-10-14 8:58 ` Will Deacon 2021-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] freezer,umh: Clean up freezer/initrd interaction Peter Zijlstra 2021-10-14 9:13 ` Will Deacon 2021-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] ptrace: Order and comment PT_flags Peter Zijlstra 2021-10-14 9:31 ` Will Deacon 2021-10-14 14:27 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] ptrace: Track __TASK_TRACED state in p->ptrace Peter Zijlstra 2021-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] sched,ptrace: Avoid relying on __TASK_TRACED | __TASK_STOPPED Peter Zijlstra 2021-10-09 10:08 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] freezer,sched: Rewrite core freezer logic Peter Zijlstra 2021-10-18 13:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20211009100754.690769957@infradead.org \ --to=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mgorman@suse.de \ --cc=mingo@kernel.org \ --cc=oleg@redhat.com \ --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \ --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \ --cc=tj@kernel.org \ --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Freezer rewrite' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.