All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 9/9] nvme: wire up completion batching for the IRQ path
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 10:54:16 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211013165416.985696-10-axboe@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211013165416.985696-1-axboe@kernel.dk>

Trivial to do now, just need our own io_batch on the stack and pass that
in to the usual command completion handling.

I pondered making this dependent on how many entries we had to process,
but even for a single entry there's no discernable difference in
performance or latency. Running a sync workload over io_uring:

t/io_uring -b512 -d1 -s1 -c1 -p0 -F1 -B1 -n2 /dev/nvme1n1 /dev/nvme2n1

yields the below performance before the patch:

IOPS=254820, BW=124MiB/s, IOS/call=1/1, inflight=(1 1)
IOPS=251174, BW=122MiB/s, IOS/call=1/1, inflight=(1 1)
IOPS=250806, BW=122MiB/s, IOS/call=1/1, inflight=(1 1)

and the following after:

IOPS=255972, BW=124MiB/s, IOS/call=1/1, inflight=(1 1)
IOPS=251920, BW=123MiB/s, IOS/call=1/1, inflight=(1 1)
IOPS=251794, BW=122MiB/s, IOS/call=1/1, inflight=(1 1)

which definitely isn't slower, about the same if you factor in a bit of
variance. For peak performance workloads, benchmarking shows a 2%
improvement.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
 drivers/nvme/host/pci.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
index ae253f6f5c80..061f0b1cb0ec 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
@@ -1061,6 +1061,7 @@ static inline void nvme_update_cq_head(struct nvme_queue *nvmeq)
 
 static inline int nvme_process_cq(struct nvme_queue *nvmeq)
 {
+	DEFINE_IO_BATCH(iob);
 	int found = 0;
 
 	while (nvme_cqe_pending(nvmeq)) {
@@ -1070,12 +1071,15 @@ static inline int nvme_process_cq(struct nvme_queue *nvmeq)
 		 * the cqe requires a full read memory barrier
 		 */
 		dma_rmb();
-		nvme_handle_cqe(nvmeq, NULL, nvmeq->cq_head);
+		nvme_handle_cqe(nvmeq, &iob, nvmeq->cq_head);
 		nvme_update_cq_head(nvmeq);
 	}
 
-	if (found)
+	if (found) {
+		if (iob.req_list)
+			nvme_pci_complete_batch(&iob);
 		nvme_ring_cq_doorbell(nvmeq);
+	}
 	return found;
 }
 
-- 
2.33.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-13 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-13 16:54 [PATCHSET v2 0/9] Batched completions Jens Axboe
2021-10-13 16:54 ` [PATCH 1/9] block: define io_batch structure Jens Axboe
2021-10-14  5:45   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-14 15:50     ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-14 16:06       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-14 18:14         ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-13 16:54 ` [PATCH 2/9] block: add a struct io_batch argument to fops->iopoll() Jens Axboe
2021-10-13 16:54 ` [PATCH 3/9] sbitmap: add helper to clear a batch of tags Jens Axboe
2021-10-13 16:54 ` [PATCH 4/9] sbitmap: test bit before calling test_and_set_bit() Jens Axboe
2021-10-14  7:20   ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-10-14 13:01     ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-14 18:41   ` Bart Van Assche
2021-10-13 16:54 ` [PATCH 5/9] block: add support for blk_mq_end_request_batch() Jens Axboe
2021-10-14  7:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-14 15:27     ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-13 16:54 ` [PATCH 6/9] nvme: add support for batched completion of polled IO Jens Axboe
2021-10-14  7:43   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-14 15:30     ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-14 15:34       ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-14 16:07       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-14 16:11         ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-13 16:54 ` [PATCH 7/9] block: assign batch completion handler in blk_poll() Jens Axboe
2021-10-14  7:48   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-14 15:43     ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-13 16:54 ` [PATCH 8/9] io_uring: utilize the io_batch infrastructure for more efficient polled IO Jens Axboe
2021-10-14  8:03   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-14 15:45     ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-14 16:08       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-14 18:14         ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-16  4:29           ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-16 14:33             ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-13 16:54 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2021-10-14  7:53   ` [PATCH 9/9] nvme: wire up completion batching for the IRQ path Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-14 15:49     ` Jens Axboe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-10-12 18:17 [PATCHSET 0/9] Batched completions Jens Axboe
2021-10-12 18:17 ` [PATCH 9/9] nvme: wire up completion batching for the IRQ path Jens Axboe
2021-10-13  7:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-13 15:04     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211013165416.985696-10-axboe@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.