From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, oleg@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, mgorman@suse.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] ptrace: Order and comment PT_flags
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 10:31:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211014093121.GA8239@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211009101444.971532166@infradead.org>
On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 12:07:57PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Add a comment to the PT_flags to indicate their actual value, this
> makes it easier to see what bits are used and where there might be a
> possible hole to use.
>
> Notable PT_SEIZED was placed wrong, also PT_EVENT_FLAG() space seems
> ill defined, as written is seems to be meant to cover the entire
> PTRACE_O_ range offset by 3 bits, which would then be 3+[0..21],
> however PT_SEIZED is in the middle of that.
Why do you think PT_EVENT_FLAG() should cover all the PTRACE_O_* options?
Just going by the name and current callers, I'd only expect it to cover
the PTRACE_EVENT_* flags, no?
But in any case, having the comments is helpful, so:
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-14 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-09 10:07 [PATCH v3 0/6] Freezer rewrite Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] freezer: Have {,un}lock_system_sleep() save/restore flags Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-14 8:58 ` Will Deacon
2021-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] freezer,umh: Clean up freezer/initrd interaction Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-14 9:13 ` Will Deacon
2021-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] ptrace: Order and comment PT_flags Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-14 9:31 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2021-10-14 14:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] ptrace: Track __TASK_TRACED state in p->ptrace Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-09 10:07 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] sched,ptrace: Avoid relying on __TASK_TRACED | __TASK_STOPPED Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-09 10:08 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] freezer,sched: Rewrite core freezer logic Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-18 13:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211014093121.GA8239@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] ptrace: Order and comment PT_flags' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.