From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E544C433FE for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 12:24:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E79E610D2 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 12:24:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231587AbhJNM0T (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Oct 2021 08:26:19 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39390 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229912AbhJNM0R (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Oct 2021 08:26:17 -0400 Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [IPv6:2a01:238:438b:c500:173d:9f52:ddab:ee01]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1E49C061570; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 05:24:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from crub (pd95f1d7c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.95.29.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: agust@denx.de) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD87A8362B; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 14:24:09 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=denx.de; s=phobos-20191101; t=1634214250; bh=QmU2rqEKQ3dXNDZ9x0ZGC5r318El4iF000T+HRihIwI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lwXB7fCcUaPIpC2i0tAyoiToGS1EzjVqtf2ujo0P15lDRdJX8N1wWLvaMiQ4YnrPR INGS33DU99OFU+t4h55LOstPHmIkyKQ4WHdTcWQVkYcvmPvjacuZIJ4oWoNcEmbQ1P M21hO5M925xsZLiP/KJIndGs6F/doozWP0/x39INafJVxlz/o+GlXEgG8G5mlpzVYM Fg5FBLRTrS3te/N/8r6vz27eDimbiKS9wMN5gPuDi3hCjp93pO2YJ9dg0VrGm5WDLg nV4GUKw0WZ8HXPvTQdUNjTniP4GWx4X8cXR5/wihocG9fZlluI0xZBKGb5ItgWuuz+ AkDvumkP4JR2w== Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 14:24:09 +0200 From: Anatolij Gustschin To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Rob Herring , Stephen Rothwell , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List , PowerPC Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings in Linus' tree Message-ID: <20211014142409.2b329ff1@crub> In-Reply-To: References: <20211008164728.30e3d3a3@canb.auug.org.au> <20211011082704.3cff4568@canb.auug.org.au> <20211014001232.3becbe99@crub> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.2 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 10:44:46 +0200 Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de wrote: >On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 12:12 AM Anatolij Gustschin wrote: >> On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:39:56 +0200 >> Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de wrote: >> ... >> >Grant Likely was the original maintainer for MPC52xx until 2011, >> >Anatolij Gustschin is still listed as maintainer since then but hasn't >> >been active in it for a while either. Anatolij can probably best judge >> >which of these boards are still in going to be used with future kernels, >> >but I suspect once you start removing bits from 52xx, the newer >> >but less common 512x platform can go away as well. >> >> many of these boards are still used, i.e. o2d*, digsy_mtc, tqm5200. > >Just for clarification, I assume when you say "still used" that implies >getting updated to new kernels rather than just running the old BSPs, >right? yes, at least some of them. I used v5.4 kernel on digsy_mtc and tqm5200 last year, and v5.10 kernel is also known to work. >What are the typical distro release cycles for those machines >you list: do you move from one LTS kernel to the next each year, >or are they getting more sporadic over time? these machines are in embedded systems and do not get regular distro updates, therefore more sporadic over time. >Do you expect the machines with the lowest memory such as the >32MB digsy to stop getting kernel updates before the others? No. There are also digsy variants with 256MiB DRAM. Thanks, Anatolij From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361A9C433EF for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 12:25:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74B22610CB for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 12:25:00 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 74B22610CB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=denx.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HVTB231Yyz3c53 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 23:24:58 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=denx.de header.i=@denx.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=phobos-20191101 header.b=lwXB7fCc; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=denx.de (client-ip=85.214.62.61; helo=phobos.denx.de; envelope-from=agust@denx.de; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=denx.de header.i=@denx.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=phobos-20191101 header.b=lwXB7fCc; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HVT9F3hTZz2xfJ for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 23:24:15 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from crub (pd95f1d7c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.95.29.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: agust@denx.de) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD87A8362B; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 14:24:09 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=denx.de; s=phobos-20191101; t=1634214250; bh=QmU2rqEKQ3dXNDZ9x0ZGC5r318El4iF000T+HRihIwI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lwXB7fCcUaPIpC2i0tAyoiToGS1EzjVqtf2ujo0P15lDRdJX8N1wWLvaMiQ4YnrPR INGS33DU99OFU+t4h55LOstPHmIkyKQ4WHdTcWQVkYcvmPvjacuZIJ4oWoNcEmbQ1P M21hO5M925xsZLiP/KJIndGs6F/doozWP0/x39INafJVxlz/o+GlXEgG8G5mlpzVYM Fg5FBLRTrS3te/N/8r6vz27eDimbiKS9wMN5gPuDi3hCjp93pO2YJ9dg0VrGm5WDLg nV4GUKw0WZ8HXPvTQdUNjTniP4GWx4X8cXR5/wihocG9fZlluI0xZBKGb5ItgWuuz+ AkDvumkP4JR2w== Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 14:24:09 +0200 From: Anatolij Gustschin To: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings in Linus' tree Message-ID: <20211014142409.2b329ff1@crub> In-Reply-To: References: <20211008164728.30e3d3a3@canb.auug.org.au> <20211011082704.3cff4568@canb.auug.org.au> <20211014001232.3becbe99@crub> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.2 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linux Next Mailing List , Rob Herring , PowerPC , Linux Kernel Mailing List Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 10:44:46 +0200 Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de wrote: >On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 12:12 AM Anatolij Gustschin wrote: >> On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 16:39:56 +0200 >> Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de wrote: >> ... >> >Grant Likely was the original maintainer for MPC52xx until 2011, >> >Anatolij Gustschin is still listed as maintainer since then but hasn't >> >been active in it for a while either. Anatolij can probably best judge >> >which of these boards are still in going to be used with future kernels, >> >but I suspect once you start removing bits from 52xx, the newer >> >but less common 512x platform can go away as well. >> >> many of these boards are still used, i.e. o2d*, digsy_mtc, tqm5200. > >Just for clarification, I assume when you say "still used" that implies >getting updated to new kernels rather than just running the old BSPs, >right? yes, at least some of them. I used v5.4 kernel on digsy_mtc and tqm5200 last year, and v5.10 kernel is also known to work. >What are the typical distro release cycles for those machines >you list: do you move from one LTS kernel to the next each year, >or are they getting more sporadic over time? these machines are in embedded systems and do not get regular distro updates, therefore more sporadic over time. >Do you expect the machines with the lowest memory such as the >32MB digsy to stop getting kernel updates before the others? No. There are also digsy variants with 256MiB DRAM. Thanks, Anatolij