From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13BBC433F5 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:02:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7EC960FF2 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:02:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230340AbhJULFK (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2021 07:05:10 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:58388 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230324AbhJULFG (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2021 07:05:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1634814170; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qOiSWqgECZJi4yTpDwh5GiM4MdjOSwLswQT3eU7nHgU=; b=SIzTq0IE5vtqxeIuTUTighSOJe/lhOVg2ijZZ6oaqedx08dvGbvawnqhZl2ei8nL8/PHCs LdfiTKZprguholbPN90WuIYpc0zJw0/2JrY1hHISqvKKpw9sSCbdmx3UoJL21s9EERJQR7 ZzsZHwHeWso8LnxGiYc9kQPixCvi7YM= Received: from mail-ed1-f69.google.com (mail-ed1-f69.google.com [209.85.208.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-409-KkWPbSmAOq6n0FbK5nwBPQ-1; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 07:02:49 -0400 X-MC-Unique: KkWPbSmAOq6n0FbK5nwBPQ-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f69.google.com with SMTP id x5-20020a50f185000000b003db0f796903so23929120edl.18 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 04:02:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qOiSWqgECZJi4yTpDwh5GiM4MdjOSwLswQT3eU7nHgU=; b=jVysultZzrszTZVFHz3trcFm6SUS3O/ghkUb3kk7wNgX1hZo+LbIJ2QzqNYRbAxlQn yZoW+WTiGEUsAqjKt3d2Lq6zvSbNPbTRgUVrl+ZPA6uQbOiYb5VWLfh19Tbtg0etyM/m RBjZG0Wv3ei6suRhz4kjKVHkwR4ur+Bb7yWqJ7n9oBi1gkfVDEZ+9O16WcvfwPt6y37D RtJOJOk01xXHuXYapMxoiIGFHKZZuN7fDtBfceuX4mSjgZEG5v2cGpfw5R6O//zhZ2eQ v1Q74MrZuGwDO3zgpqX5ept8F3RAZ0+AezaR16Helpkf4P2PcaZWIuaYL0njFewBT+Kg C4vg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530nfe9iYSevxlpDHBekFFQ/eLjUMaiqlTI4gGfYJBDabAvV/m5/ X8G49GZdgUd1L1RttNgrw9+8l9QKQjTS7SHVBzMCbuJbMF42SuzqKBSbkg+YCkuy6kehzStux/i XD04PCUrTqzBg4uHR7+ozICy/LwP2 X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7d8b:: with SMTP id oz11mr6598850ejc.84.1634814168029; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 04:02:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwlE/37QTO1ZOAuGy2cFKitbTNV8MRY1JXUWr4lxBB0QSH/S1DEvn8A710iRt0gxxeQXJ7snw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7d8b:: with SMTP id oz11mr6598822ejc.84.1634814167788; Thu, 21 Oct 2021 04:02:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([185.112.167.53]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o25sm2645237edq.40.2021.10.21.04.02.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 21 Oct 2021 04:02:47 -0700 (PDT) From: =?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= To: Phil Sutter Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Pablo Neira Ayuso Subject: Re: [PATCH nft 1/3] tests: shell: README: copy edit In-Reply-To: <20211021102644.GM1668@orbyte.nwl.cc> References: <20211020124512.490288-1-snemec@redhat.com> <20211020150402.GJ1668@orbyte.nwl.cc> <20211021103025+0200.945334-snemec@redhat.com> <20211021102644.GM1668@orbyte.nwl.cc> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.33.2 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/29.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:03:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20211021130323+0200.342006-snemec@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 12:26:44 +0200 Phil Sutter wrote: > Sorry for not checking the guideline but quoting advice I once received > from the top of my head instead. Maybe I was incorrect and in obvious > cases the description is optional. The relevant text in [2] at least > doesn't explicitly state it is, while being pretty verbose about it > regarding cover letters. Does this mean that you retract your requirement? If not, could you please make sure that you and the other maintainers are on the same page about this, and document the requirement? Regarding this patch series (if it is to be resent, in part or as a whole): we've discussed the first patch so far; the other two patches have no description, either. Do they need one? If so, could you provide some suggestions? I can't think of anything sensible that isn't already said in the subject, Fixes:, or the modified README text itself. Thanks, =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n