[PATCH v5 bpf-next 5/5] bpf/benchs: Add benchmarks for comparing hashmap lookups w/ vs. w/out bloom filter

[Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com>]

This patch adds benchmark tests for comparing the performance of hashmap
lookups without the bloom filter vs. hashmap lookups with the bloom filter.

Checking the bloom filter first for whether the element exists should
overall enable a higher throughput for hashmap lookups, since if the
element does not exist in the bloom filter, we can avoid a costly lookup in
the hashmap.

On average, using 5 hash functions in the bloom filter tended to perform
the best across the widest range of different entry sizes. The benchmark
results using 5 hash functions (running on 8 threads on a machine with one
numa node, and taking the average of 3 runs) were roughly as follows:

value_size = 4 bytes -
	10k entries: 30% faster
	50k entries: 40% faster
	100k entries: 40% faster
	500k entres: 70% faster
	1 million entries: 90% faster
	5 million entries: 140% faster

value_size = 8 bytes -
	10k entries: 30% faster
	50k entries: 40% faster
	100k entries: 50% faster
	500k entres: 80% faster
	1 million entries: 100% faster
	5 million entries: 150% faster

value_size = 16 bytes -
	10k entries: 20% faster
	50k entries: 30% faster
	100k entries: 35% faster
	500k entres: 65% faster
	1 million entries: 85% faster
	5 million entries: 110% faster

value_size = 40 bytes -
	10k entries: 5% faster
	50k entries: 15% faster
	100k entries: 20% faster
	500k entres: 65% faster
	1 million entries: 75% faster
	5 million entries: 120% faster

Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c           | 23 ++++++--
 .../bpf/benchs/bench_bloom_filter_map.c       | 57 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../bpf/benchs/run_bench_bloom_filter_map.sh  | 17 ++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/benchs/run_common.sh        | 12 ++++
 4 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c
index a1d5dffe5ef6..cc4722f693e9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c
@@ -92,20 +92,22 @@ void hits_drops_report_progress(int iter, struct bench_res *res, long delta_ns)
 	printf("Iter %3d (%7.3lfus): ",
 	       iter, (delta_ns - 1000000000) / 1000.0);
 
-	printf("hits %8.3lfM/s (%7.3lfM/prod), drops %8.3lfM/s\n",
-	       hits_per_sec, hits_per_prod, drops_per_sec);
+	printf("hits %8.3lfM/s (%7.3lfM/prod), drops %8.3lfM/s, total operations %8.3lfM/s\n",
+	       hits_per_sec, hits_per_prod, drops_per_sec, hits_per_sec + drops_per_sec);
 }
 
 void hits_drops_report_final(struct bench_res res[], int res_cnt)
 {
 	int i;
-	double hits_mean = 0.0, drops_mean = 0.0;
-	double hits_stddev = 0.0, drops_stddev = 0.0;
+	double hits_mean = 0.0, drops_mean = 0.0, total_ops_mean = 0.0;
+	double hits_stddev = 0.0, drops_stddev = 0.0, total_ops_stddev = 0.0;
+	double total_ops;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < res_cnt; i++) {
 		hits_mean += res[i].hits / 1000000.0 / (0.0 + res_cnt);
 		drops_mean += res[i].drops / 1000000.0 / (0.0 + res_cnt);
 	}
+	total_ops_mean = hits_mean + drops_mean;
 
 	if (res_cnt > 1)  {
 		for (i = 0; i < res_cnt; i++) {
@@ -115,14 +117,21 @@ void hits_drops_report_final(struct bench_res res[], int res_cnt)
 			drops_stddev += (drops_mean - res[i].drops / 1000000.0) *
 					(drops_mean - res[i].drops / 1000000.0) /
 					(res_cnt - 1.0);
+			total_ops = res[i].hits + res[i].drops;
+			total_ops_stddev += (total_ops_mean - total_ops / 1000000.0) *
+					(total_ops_mean - total_ops / 1000000.0) /
+					(res_cnt - 1.0);
 		}
 		hits_stddev = sqrt(hits_stddev);
 		drops_stddev = sqrt(drops_stddev);
+		total_ops_stddev = sqrt(total_ops_stddev);
 	}
 	printf("Summary: hits %8.3lf \u00B1 %5.3lfM/s (%7.3lfM/prod), ",
 	       hits_mean, hits_stddev, hits_mean / env.producer_cnt);
-	printf("drops %8.3lf \u00B1 %5.3lfM/s\n",
+	printf("drops %8.3lf \u00B1 %5.3lfM/s, ",
 	       drops_mean, drops_stddev);
+	printf("total operations %8.3lf \u00B1 %5.3lfM/s\n",
+	       total_ops_mean, total_ops_stddev);
 }
 
 const char *argp_program_version = "benchmark";
@@ -357,6 +366,8 @@ extern const struct bench bench_pb_custom;
 extern const struct bench bench_bloom_lookup;
 extern const struct bench bench_bloom_update;
 extern const struct bench bench_bloom_false_positive;
+extern const struct bench bench_hashmap_without_bloom;
+extern const struct bench bench_hashmap_with_bloom;
 
 static const struct bench *benchs[] = {
 	&bench_count_global,
@@ -381,6 +392,8 @@ static const struct bench *benchs[] = {
 	&bench_bloom_lookup,
 	&bench_bloom_update,
 	&bench_bloom_false_positive,
+	&bench_hashmap_without_bloom,
+	&bench_hashmap_with_bloom,
 };
 
 static void setup_benchmark()
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_bloom_filter_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_bloom_filter_map.c
index 469d99002d6a..a8328893c5b3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_bloom_filter_map.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_bloom_filter_map.c
@@ -346,6 +346,41 @@ static void false_positive_setup(void)
 	}
 }
 
+static void hashmap_with_bloom_setup(void)
+{
+	struct bpf_link *link;
+
+	ctx.use_hashmap = true;
+	ctx.hashmap_use_bloom = true;
+
+	ctx.skel = setup_skeleton();
+
+	populate_maps();
+
+	link = bpf_program__attach(ctx.skel->progs.bloom_hashmap_lookup);
+	if (!link) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "failed to attach program!\n");
+		exit(1);
+	}
+}
+
+static void hashmap_no_bloom_setup(void)
+{
+	struct bpf_link *link;
+
+	ctx.use_hashmap = true;
+
+	ctx.skel = setup_skeleton();
+
+	populate_maps();
+
+	link = bpf_program__attach(ctx.skel->progs.bloom_hashmap_lookup);
+	if (!link) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "failed to attach program!\n");
+		exit(1);
+	}
+}
+
 static void measure(struct bench_res *res)
 {
 	unsigned long total_hits = 0, total_drops = 0, total_false_hits = 0;
@@ -418,3 +453,25 @@ const struct bench bench_bloom_false_positive = {
 	.report_progress = false_hits_report_progress,
 	.report_final = false_hits_report_final,
 };
+
+const struct bench bench_hashmap_without_bloom = {
+	.name = "hashmap-without-bloom",
+	.validate = validate,
+	.setup = hashmap_no_bloom_setup,
+	.producer_thread = producer,
+	.consumer_thread = consumer,
+	.measure = measure,
+	.report_progress = hits_drops_report_progress,
+	.report_final = hits_drops_report_final,
+};
+
+const struct bench bench_hashmap_with_bloom = {
+	.name = "hashmap-with-bloom",
+	.validate = validate,
+	.setup = hashmap_with_bloom_setup,
+	.producer_thread = producer,
+	.consumer_thread = consumer,
+	.measure = measure,
+	.report_progress = hits_drops_report_progress,
+	.report_final = hits_drops_report_final,
+};
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_bloom_filter_map.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_bloom_filter_map.sh
index b2db39bd3236..cc79ea8741a2 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_bloom_filter_map.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_bloom_filter_map.sh
@@ -26,3 +26,20 @@ subtitle "value_size: $v bytes, # threads: $t, # hashes: $h"
 done
 done
 done
+
+header "Hashmap without bloom filter vs. hashmap with bloom filter (throughput, 8 threads)"
+for v in 2, 4, 8, 16, 40; do
+for h in {1..10}; do
+subtitle "value_size: $v, # hashes: $h"
+	for e in 10000 50000 75000 100000 250000 500000 750000 1000000 2500000 5000000; do
+		printf "%'d entries -\n" $e
+		printf "\t"
+		summarize_total "Hashmap without bloom filter: " \
+			"$($RUN_BENCH --nr_hash_funcs $h --nr_entries $e --value_size $v -p 8 hashmap-without-bloom)"
+		printf "\t"
+		summarize_total "Hashmap with bloom filter: " \
+			"$($RUN_BENCH --nr_hash_funcs $h --nr_entries $e --value_size $v -p 8 hashmap-with-bloom)"
+	done
+	printf "\n"
+done
+done
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_common.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_common.sh
index 670f23b037c4..9a16be78b180 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_common.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_common.sh
@@ -33,6 +33,11 @@ function percentage()
 	echo "$*" | sed -E "s/.*Percentage\s=\s+([0-9]+\.[0-9]+).*/\1/"
 }
 
+function total()
+{
+	echo "$*" | sed -E "s/.*total operations\s+([0-9]+\.[0-9]+ ± [0-9]+\.[0-9]+M\/s).*/\1/"
+}
+
 function summarize()
 {
 	bench="$1"
@@ -46,3 +51,10 @@ function summarize_percentage()
 	summary=$(echo $2 | tail -n1)
 	printf "%-20s %s%%\n" "$bench" "$(percentage $summary)"
 }
+
+function summarize_total()
+{
+	bench="$1"
+	summary=$(echo $2 | tail -n1)
+	printf "%-20s %s\n" "$bench" "$(total $summary)"
+}
-- 
2.30.2