Re: [PATCH 2/5 v3] sh: add git tree to MAINTAINERS

[Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>]

On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 10:33:54AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Rich,
> 
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 10:54 PM Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 05:19:11PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > Add the git tree location for linux-sh.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> 
> > > --- linux-next-20211001.orig/MAINTAINERS
> > > +++ linux-next-20211001/MAINTAINERS
> > > @@ -18047,6 +18047,7 @@ M:    Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourcefor
> > >  M:   Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
> > >  L:   linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
> > >  S:   Maintained
> > > +T:   git git://git.libc.org/linux-sh
> > >  Q:   http://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-sh/list/
> > >  F:   Documentation/sh/
> > >  F:   arch/sh/
> >
> > I'm omitting this for now since (as noted on the cgit description)
> > this server is not provisioned adequately for cloning from scratch,
> > and should only be used for fetch into an already-populated mainline
> > repo clone. If that's a problem I can see about getting it moved
> > somewhere more appropriate.
> 
> Perhaps you can move it to kernel.org?

I would love to. This was my hope years ago, but I got bogged down in
the GPG key signing requirements and folks not following through with
signing my key. Has any of that been streamlined since?

> > The rest of this series should appear in next shortly.
> 
> Thanks a lot!

Looks like it's been pulled by next now with no reports of anything
going wrong. I know it's late in the release cycle but should I
probably go ahead and send a PR?

Rich