From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F38C433F5 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 15:22:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5964B6115B for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 15:22:00 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 5964B6115B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:49744 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mgThf-0000WJ-D9 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 11:21:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57332) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mgTgO-000888-5y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 11:20:40 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:49057) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mgTgH-0004We-JG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 11:20:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1635520831; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=FiNF/bP2lleNiMrwOiv3WBy3mxZIPMTfFLIHcGb7YnY=; b=KPKDonCsIbSdNsy2vsLmnAl/EHnP/+oC0E1yp9eHcN1MZ4+TQCmseMUClLdjA6SJF7iPz7 PJTdnrI6LsywGaGghjMHJs7aLT07PVve3JVThYLXQkhWNcCqES7P67lS5VFmrlG2WfRJEK ZeXcGE9QJlzOsHODeCCgMowdO3XPThk= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-286-rtoCU9psP5iGrL5XZd96fA-1; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 11:20:28 -0400 X-MC-Unique: rtoCU9psP5iGrL5XZd96fA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FD6D100D686; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 15:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-112-232.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.112.232]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51027604CC; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 15:20:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 10:20:24 -0500 From: Eric Blake To: Markus Armbruster Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] qapi: Generalize struct member policy checking Message-ID: <20211029152024.7x2tiizzswurimdf@redhat.com> References: <20211028102520.747396-1-armbru@redhat.com> <20211028102520.747396-6-armbru@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20211028102520.747396-6-armbru@redhat.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20211022 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=eblake@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=eblake@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, pkrempa@redhat.com, berrange@redhat.com, ehabkost@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, quintela@redhat.com, libvir-list@redhat.com, philmd@redhat.com, kchamart@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, dgilbert@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com, jsnow@redhat.com, libguestfs@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 12:25:16PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: > The generated visitor functions call visit_deprecated_accept() and > visit_deprecated() when visiting a struct member with special feature > flag 'deprecated'. This makes the feature flag visible to the actual > visitors. I want to make feature flag 'unstable' visible there as > well, so I can add policy for it. > > To let me make it visible, replace these functions by > visit_policy_reject() and visit_policy_skip(), which take the member's > special features as an argument. Note that the new functions have the > opposite sense, i.e. the return value flips. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster > --- > +++ b/qapi/qapi-forward-visitor.c > @@ -246,25 +246,27 @@ static void forward_field_optional(Visitor *v, const char *name, bool *present) > visit_optional(ffv->target, name, present); > } > > -static bool forward_field_deprecated_accept(Visitor *v, const char *name, > - Error **errp) > +static bool forward_field_policy_reject(Visitor *v, const char *name, > + unsigned special_features, > + Error **errp) > { > ForwardFieldVisitor *ffv = to_ffv(v); > > if (!forward_field_translate_name(ffv, &name, errp)) { > return false; Should this return value be flipped? > } > - return visit_deprecated_accept(ffv->target, name, errp); > + return visit_policy_reject(ffv->target, name, special_features, errp); > } > > -static bool forward_field_deprecated(Visitor *v, const char *name) > +static bool forward_field_policy_skip(Visitor *v, const char *name, > + unsigned special_features) > { > ForwardFieldVisitor *ffv = to_ffv(v); > > if (!forward_field_translate_name(ffv, &name, NULL)) { > return false; and here too? > } > - return visit_deprecated(ffv->target, name); > + return visit_policy_skip(ffv->target, name, special_features); > } > Otherwise, the rest of the logic changes for flipped sense look right. -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org