From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F01C433F5 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 05:59:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8036056B for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 05:59:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229616AbhKBGBh (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Nov 2021 02:01:37 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:54483 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229486AbhKBGBg (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Nov 2021 02:01:36 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 270BB68AA6; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 06:58:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 06:58:57 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Guo Ren Cc: Palmer Dabbelt , Wei Fu , Anup Patel , Atish Patra , Christoph =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=FCllner?= , Philipp Tomsich , Christoph Hellwig , liush , Wei Wu =?utf-8?B?KOWQtOS8nyk=?= , Drew Fustini , linux-riscv , Linux Kernel Mailing List , taiten.peng@canonical.com, Aniket Ponkshe , Heinrich Schuchardt , Gordan Markus , Guo Ren , Arnd Bergmann , Chen-Yu Tsai , Maxime Ripard , Daniel Lustig , Greg Favor , Andrea Mondelli , Jonathan Behrens , "Xinhaoqu (Freddie)" , Bill Huffman , Nick Kossifidis , Allen Baum , Josh Scheid , Richard Trauben Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V3 0/2] riscv: add RISC-V Svpbmt Standard Extension supports Message-ID: <20211102055857.GB26925@lst.de> References: <20211025040607.92786-1-wefu@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 10:07:58AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote: > > To separate MMU & no-MMU clearly, I suggest fuwei add > #if defined(CONFIG_64BIT) && defined(CONFIG_MMU) Actually - for documentation purposes a new CONFIG_RISCV_SVPBMT that depends on 64BIT && MMU would probably much better as it clearly documents the intent here. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0C2C433EF for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 05:59:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3B1D6056B for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 05:59:23 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org A3B1D6056B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=ewbUuZ25/nyu1xoBL9RYsoDIATS0HrJFVSf0IbT7fBo=; b=Hv1bwqB0Z9bz35 /o1Wlth+SvpB+g9Jn5G2IQdOVqCZ3fwqqnXYjhKXUW6t6isQ2br5QqBb6H5OlyXg2Fk68n6DwzpS4 r1FkVD5oOEqinBdWgIsdL+Pkf3S9dg2lYgakSqwjFzgHISZ5TzbdJwQzmpuj4pTnZDB/Uxz775LPV ACMinUKZHYLgYMPcD2JE9EqpUEig4RRoO3/965dTyfnmq9fxeZytJW/doJjnU8CS87LZmOw30Pygm oQK3a4gMCxPgbnr6LEHewybugB3km89XiB3yI9rpcd3LYrK7EDJ/y0pkENR6XFfvFbkZ6SiwYLNYF 9CrXw6HyO0cGzxvcpjKA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mhmpC-000bYH-KJ; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 05:59:10 +0000 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mhmpA-000bX3-0g for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 05:59:09 +0000 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 270BB68AA6; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 06:58:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 06:58:57 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Guo Ren Cc: Palmer Dabbelt , Wei Fu , Anup Patel , Atish Patra , Christoph =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=FCllner?= , Philipp Tomsich , Christoph Hellwig , liush , Wei Wu =?utf-8?B?KOWQtOS8nyk=?= , Drew Fustini , linux-riscv , Linux Kernel Mailing List , taiten.peng@canonical.com, Aniket Ponkshe , Heinrich Schuchardt , Gordan Markus , Guo Ren , Arnd Bergmann , Chen-Yu Tsai , Maxime Ripard , Daniel Lustig , Greg Favor , Andrea Mondelli , Jonathan Behrens , "Xinhaoqu (Freddie)" , Bill Huffman , Nick Kossifidis , Allen Baum , Josh Scheid , Richard Trauben Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V3 0/2] riscv: add RISC-V Svpbmt Standard Extension supports Message-ID: <20211102055857.GB26925@lst.de> References: <20211025040607.92786-1-wefu@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211101_225908_257353_8D79C8B0 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.68 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 10:07:58AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote: > > To separate MMU & no-MMU clearly, I suggest fuwei add > #if defined(CONFIG_64BIT) && defined(CONFIG_MMU) Actually - for documentation purposes a new CONFIG_RISCV_SVPBMT that depends on 64BIT && MMU would probably much better as it clearly documents the intent here. _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv