All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitrii Banshchikov <me@ubique.spb.ru>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	syzbot <syzbot+43fd005b5a1b4d10781e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	sboyd@kernel.org,
	syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rosted@goodmis.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] possible deadlock in ktime_get_coarse_ts64
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 21:03:28 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211105170328.fjnzr6bnbca7mdfq@amnesia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQLcuMAr3XMTD1Lys5S5ybME4h=NL3=adEwib2UT6b-E9w@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 08:53:06AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 6:10 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > -> #0 (tk_core.seq.seqcount){----}-{0:0}:
> > >        check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3051 [inline]
> > >        check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3174 [inline]
> > >        validate_chain+0x1dfb/0x8240 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3789
> > >        __lock_acquire+0x1382/0x2b00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015
> > >        lock_acquire+0x19f/0x4d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5625
> > >        seqcount_lockdep_reader_access+0xfe/0x230 include/linux/seqlock.h:103
> > >        ktime_get_coarse_ts64+0x25/0x110 kernel/time/timekeeping.c:2255
> > >        ktime_get_coarse include/linux/timekeeping.h:120 [inline]
> > >        ktime_get_coarse_ns include/linux/timekeeping.h:126 [inline]
> >
> > --> this call is invalid
> >
> > >        ____bpf_ktime_get_coarse_ns kernel/bpf/helpers.c:173 [inline]
> > >        bpf_ktime_get_coarse_ns+0x7e/0x130 kernel/bpf/helpers.c:171
> > >        bpf_prog_a99735ebafdda2f1+0x10/0xb50
> > >        bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:721 [inline]
> > >        __bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:626 [inline]
> > >        bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:633 [inline]
> > >        BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY include/linux/bpf.h:1294 [inline]
> > >        trace_call_bpf+0x2cf/0x5d0 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:127
> > >        perf_trace_run_bpf_submit+0x7b/0x1d0 kernel/events/core.c:9708
> > >        perf_trace_lock+0x37c/0x440 include/trace/events/lock.h:39
> > >        trace_lock_release+0x128/0x150 include/trace/events/lock.h:58
> >
> > Timestamps from within a tracepoint can only be taken with:
> >
> >          1) jiffies
> >          2) sched_clock()
> >          3) ktime_get_*_fast_ns()
> >
> > Those are NMI safe and can be invoked from anywhere.
> >
> > All other time getters which have to use the timekeeping seqcount
> > protection are prone to live locks and _cannot_ be used from
> > tracepoints ever.
> 
> Obviously.
> That helper was added for networking use cases and accidentally
> enabled for tracing.

Sorry for that.
I'm preparing a patch that will forbid using bpf_ktime_get_coarse_ns()
helper in BPF_LINK_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT.



-- 

Dmitrii Banshchikov

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-05 17:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-04 16:18 [syzbot] possible deadlock in ktime_get_coarse_ts64 syzbot
2021-11-05 13:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-05 13:21   ` Steven Rostedt
2021-11-05 15:53   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-11-05 17:03     ` Dmitrii Banshchikov [this message]
2021-11-05 17:24       ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-06 20:07         ` Dmitrii Banshchikov
2021-11-07 10:32           ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-07 13:51             ` Dmitrii Banshchikov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211105170328.fjnzr6bnbca7mdfq@amnesia \
    --to=me@ubique.spb.ru \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rosted@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+43fd005b5a1b4d10781e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.