From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, dvyukov@google.com, seanjc@google.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, mbenes@suse.cz, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/22] x86,word-at-a-time: Remove .fixup usage
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 06:14:28 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211110121428.GD614@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211109210736.GV174703@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Hi!
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:07:36PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 11:22:44AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > I think the use of this feature (label-attributes) here isn't
> > necessary though; because of the use of outputs, the "fallthrough"
> > basic block needs to be placed immediately after the basic block
> > terminated by the asm goto, at least in LLVM. Was different ordering
> > of basic blocks observed with GCC without this label attribute?
>
> GCC does the same, but I wanted to have the exception stuff be in
> .text.cold, but alas it doesn't do that. I left the attribute because of
> it's descriptive value.
>
> > Unless the cold attribute is helping move
> > ("shrink-wrap"?)
Shrink-wrapping is something else entirely.
>> the basic block to a whole other section
> > (.text.cold.)?
>
> I was hoping it would do that, but it doesn't on gcc-11.
A cold basic block can never dominate a non-cold basic block. GCC will
fix things up when it notices this property is violated, so marking
random blocks as "cold" will not be very effective.
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-10 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-05 17:10 [PATCH 00/22] x86: Remove anonymous out-of-line fixups Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 01/22] bitfield.h: Fix "type of reg too small for mask" test Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 02/22] x86,mmx_32: Remove .fixup usage Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 03/22] x86,copy_user_64: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 04/22] x86,copy_mc_64: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 05/22] x86,entry_64: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 06/22] x86,entry_32: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 07/22] x86,extable: Extend extable functionality Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 08/22] x86,msr: Remove .fixup usage Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 09/22] x86,futex: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 10/22] x86,uaccess: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 11/22] x86,xen: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 12/22] x86,fpu: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 13/22] x86,segment: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 14/22] x86,vmx: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 15/22] x86,checksum_32: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 16/22] x86,sgx: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 17/22] x86,kvm: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 18/22] x86,usercopy_32: Simplify __copy_user_intel_nocache() Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 19/22] x86,usercopy: Remove .fixup usage Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 20/22] x86,word-at-a-time: " Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 18:01 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-11-05 18:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-08 16:47 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-11-08 18:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-08 18:53 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-11-09 8:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-09 19:22 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-11-09 20:59 ` Bill Wendling
2021-11-09 21:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-09 21:25 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-11-09 22:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-09 22:15 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-11-09 21:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-10 10:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-10 10:46 ` David Laight
2021-11-10 11:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-10 12:20 ` David Laight
2021-11-12 1:50 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-11-12 9:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-13 5:35 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-11-15 12:36 ` Miroslav Benes
2021-11-15 13:01 ` Joe Lawrence
2021-11-15 23:40 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-11-16 7:25 ` Miroslav Benes
2021-11-15 12:59 ` Miroslav Benes
2021-11-16 21:27 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-11-18 7:15 ` Miroslav Benes
2021-11-22 17:46 ` Petr Mladek
2021-11-24 17:42 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-11-25 8:18 ` Petr Mladek
2021-11-10 12:14 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 21/22] x86: Remove .fixup section Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 22/22] objtool: Remove .fixup handling Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211110121428.GD614@gate.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.