All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
To: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	"Vitaly Kuznetsov" <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Sergio Lopez <slp@redhat.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Dov Murik <dovmurik@linux.ibm.com>,
	Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@ibm.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
	<tony.luck@intel.com>, <marcorr@google.com>,
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 26/45] x86/head: re-enable stack protection for 32/64-bit builds
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 16:07:12 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211110220731.2396491-27-brijesh.singh@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211110220731.2396491-1-brijesh.singh@amd.com>

From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>

As of commit 103a4908ad4d ("x86/head/64: Disable stack protection for
head$(BITS).o") kernel/head64.c is compiled with -fno-stack-protector
to allow a call to set_bringup_idt_handler(), which would otherwise
have stack protection enabled with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG. While
sufficient for that case, there may still be issues with calls to any
external functions that were compiled with stack protection enabled that
in-turn make stack-protected calls, or if the exception handlers set up
by set_bringup_idt_handler() make calls to stack-protected functions.
As part of 103a4908ad4d, stack protection was also disabled for
kernel/head32.c as a precaution.

Subsequent patches for SEV-SNP CPUID validation support will introduce
both such cases. Attempting to disable stack protection for everything
in scope to address that is prohibitive since much of the code, like
SEV-ES #VC handler, is shared code that remains in use after boot and
could benefit from having stack protection enabled. Attempting to inline
calls is brittle and can quickly balloon out to library/helper code
where that's not really an option.

Instead, re-enable stack protection for head32.c/head64.c and make the
appropriate changes to ensure the segment used for the stack canary is
initialized in advance of any stack-protected C calls.

for head64.c:

- The BSP will enter from startup_64 and call into C code
  (startup_64_setup_env) shortly after setting up the stack, which may
  result in calls to stack-protected code. Set up %gs early to allow
  for this safely.
- APs will enter from secondary_startup_64*, and %gs will be set up
  soon after. There is one call to C code prior to this
  (__startup_secondary_64), but it is only to fetch sme_me_mask, and
  unlikely to be stack-protected, so leave things as they are, but add
  a note about this in case things change in the future.

for head32.c:

- BSPs/APs will set %fs to __BOOT_DS prior to any C calls. In recent
  kernels, the compiler is configured to access the stack canary at
  %fs:__stack_chk_guard, which overlaps with the initial per-cpu
  __stack_chk_guard variable in the initial/'master' .data..percpu
  area. This is sufficient to allow access to the canary for use
  during initial startup, so no changes are needed there.

Suggested-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> #for 64-bit %gs set up
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/Makefile  |  1 -
 arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
index 2ff3e600f426..4df8c8f7d2ac 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
@@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ endif
 # non-deterministic coverage.
 KCOV_INSTRUMENT		:= n
 
-CFLAGS_head$(BITS).o	+= -fno-stack-protector
 CFLAGS_cc_platform.o	+= -fno-stack-protector
 
 CFLAGS_irq.o := -I $(srctree)/$(src)/../include/asm/trace
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
index d8b3ebd2bb85..7074ebf2b47b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
@@ -65,6 +65,22 @@ SYM_CODE_START_NOALIGN(startup_64)
 	leaq	(__end_init_task - FRAME_SIZE)(%rip), %rsp
 
 	leaq	_text(%rip), %rdi
+
+	/*
+	 * initial_gs points to initial fixed_per_cpu struct with storage for
+	 * the stack protector canary. Global pointer fixups are needed at this
+	 * stage, so apply them as is done in fixup_pointer(), and initialize %gs
+	 * such that the canary can be accessed at %gs:40 for subsequent C calls.
+	 */
+	movl	$MSR_GS_BASE, %ecx
+	movq	initial_gs(%rip), %rax
+	movq	$_text, %rdx
+	subq	%rdx, %rax
+	addq	%rdi, %rax
+	movq	%rax, %rdx
+	shrq	$32,  %rdx
+	wrmsr
+
 	pushq	%rsi
 	call	startup_64_setup_env
 	popq	%rsi
@@ -133,6 +149,14 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(secondary_startup_64_no_verify, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
 	 * added to the initial pgdir entry that will be programmed into CR3.
 	 */
 	pushq	%rsi
+	/*
+	 * NOTE: %gs at this point is a stale data segment left over from the
+	 * real-mode trampoline, so the default stack protector canary location
+	 * at %gs:40 does not yet coincide with the expected fixed_per_cpu struct
+	 * that contains storage for the stack canary. So take care not to add
+	 * anything to the C functions in this path that would result in stack
+	 * protected C code being generated.
+	 */
 	call	__startup_secondary_64
 	popq	%rsi
 
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-10 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-10 22:06 [PATCH v7 00/45] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) Guest Support Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:06 ` [PATCH v7 01/45] x86/compressed/64: detect/setup SEV/SME features earlier in boot Brijesh Singh
2021-11-12 16:52   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-11-12 20:30     ` Michael Roth
2021-11-23 21:55       ` Venu Busireddy
2021-11-10 22:06 ` [PATCH v7 02/45] x86/sev: " Brijesh Singh
2021-11-15 19:12   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-11-15 20:17     ` Michael Roth
2021-11-17 13:11       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-06 23:47   ` Venu Busireddy
2021-11-10 22:06 ` [PATCH v7 03/45] x86/mm: Extend cc_attr to include AMD SEV-SNP Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:06 ` [PATCH v7 04/45] x86/sev: Shorten GHCB terminate macro names Brijesh Singh
2021-11-16 15:33   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:06 ` [PATCH v7 05/45] x86/sev: Get rid of excessive use of defines Brijesh Singh
2021-11-16 15:33   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Borislav Petkov
2021-11-10 22:06 ` [PATCH v7 06/45] x86/head64: Carve out the guest encryption postprocessing into a helper Brijesh Singh
2021-11-16 15:33   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Borislav Petkov
2021-11-10 22:06 ` [PATCH v7 07/45] x86/sev: Remove do_early_exception() forward declarations Brijesh Singh
2021-11-16 15:33   ` [tip: x86/sev] " tip-bot2 for Borislav Petkov
2021-11-10 22:06 ` [PATCH v7 08/45] x86/sev: Define the Linux specific guest termination reasons Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:06 ` [PATCH v7 09/45] x86/sev: Save the negotiated GHCB version Brijesh Singh
2021-12-07 12:51   ` Tianyu Lan
2021-12-07 13:17     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-07 16:58       ` Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:06 ` [PATCH v7 10/45] x86/sev: Add support for hypervisor feature VMGEXIT Brijesh Singh
2021-12-02 17:52   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-06 15:15     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:06 ` [PATCH v7 11/45] x86/sev: Check SEV-SNP features support Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:06 ` [PATCH v7 12/45] x86/sev: Add a helper for the PVALIDATE instruction Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:06 ` [PATCH v7 13/45] x86/sev: Check the vmpl level Brijesh Singh
2021-12-06 18:25   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 14/45] x86/compressed: Add helper for validating pages in the decompression stage Brijesh Singh
2021-12-07 11:48   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-12-07 19:21     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 15/45] x86/compressed: Register GHCB memory when SEV-SNP is active Brijesh Singh
2021-11-15 14:05   ` Jörg Rödel
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 16/45] x86/sev: " Brijesh Singh
2021-12-08 17:41   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 17/45] x86/sev: Add helper for validating pages in early enc attribute changes Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 18/45] x86/kernel: Make the bss.decrypted section shared in RMP table Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 19/45] x86/kernel: Validate rom memory before accessing when SEV-SNP is active Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 20/45] x86/mm: Add support to validate memory when changing C-bit Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 21/45] KVM: SVM: Define sev_features and vmpl field in the VMSA Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 22/45] KVM: SVM: Create a separate mapping for the SEV-ES save area Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 23/45] KVM: SVM: Create a separate mapping for the GHCB " Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 24/45] KVM: SVM: Update the SEV-ES save area mapping Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 25/45] x86/sev: Use SEV-SNP AP creation to start secondary CPUs Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` Brijesh Singh [this message]
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 27/45] x86/sev: move MSR-based VMGEXITs for CPUID to helper Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 28/45] KVM: x86: move lookup of indexed CPUID leafs " Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 29/45] x86/compressed/acpi: move EFI system table lookup " Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 30/45] x86/compressed/acpi: move EFI config " Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 31/45] x86/compressed/acpi: move EFI vendor " Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 32/45] x86/boot: Add Confidential Computing type to setup_data Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 33/45] KVM: SEV: Add documentation for SEV-SNP CPUID Enforcement Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 34/45] x86/compressed/64: add support for SEV-SNP CPUID table in #VC handlers Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 35/45] x86/boot: add a pointer to Confidential Computing blob in bootparams Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 36/45] x86/compressed: add SEV-SNP feature detection/setup Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 37/45] x86/compressed: use firmware-validated CPUID for SEV-SNP guests Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 38/45] x86/compressed/64: add identity mapping for Confidential Computing blob Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 39/45] x86/sev: add SEV-SNP feature detection/setup Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 40/45] x86/sev: use firmware-validated CPUID for SEV-SNP guests Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 41/45] x86/sev: Provide support for SNP guest request NAEs Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 42/45] x86/sev: Register SNP guest request platform device Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 43/45] virt: Add SEV-SNP guest driver Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:27   ` Randy Dunlap
2021-11-11 19:27     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-11-11 22:57       ` Randy Dunlap
2021-11-17 23:34   ` Peter Gonda
2021-11-18 17:08     ` Peter Gonda
2021-11-18 17:32     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-11-19 16:16       ` Peter Gonda
2021-11-20  0:28         ` Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 44/45] virt: sevguest: Add support to derive key Brijesh Singh
2021-11-18 16:43   ` Peter Gonda
2021-11-18 17:43     ` Brijesh Singh
2021-11-10 22:07 ` [PATCH v7 45/45] virt: sevguest: Add support to get extended report Brijesh Singh
2021-11-15 15:56 ` [PATCH v7 00/45] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) Guest Support Venu Busireddy
2021-11-15 16:02   ` Brijesh Singh
2021-11-15 16:37     ` Venu Busireddy
2021-11-15 16:45       ` Brijesh Singh
2021-11-15 16:55         ` Venu Busireddy
2021-11-16 15:45           ` Venu Busireddy
2021-11-16 16:03             ` Brijesh Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211110220731.2396491-27-brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --to=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=dovmurik@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=marcorr@google.com \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pgonda@google.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=slp@redhat.com \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=tobin@ibm.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.