From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA2CCC433F5 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 01:01:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA80861B3F for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 01:01:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242113AbhKRBE1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 20:04:27 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59706 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242118AbhKRBEA (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 20:04:00 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x532.google.com (mail-pg1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::532]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 644A7C061766; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 17:01:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x532.google.com with SMTP id p17so3792056pgj.2; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 17:01:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=CldWxF+xHdMGvS6Ww1B8FNZQUYPzrzWUDuo2TU0I4PM=; b=IXgkU6U+xtO8Ku5gLtxEqkE+vVeF2WpddqjXMgSDNbjqghnhEYbjAq0UKoge6akEA3 tIyUDzAoUHxIAC5WF4aVf2dWN9i6drJVqdfWMwjb0R2wH7gLmWN3Eni/PSW1zaRP7h3Y 9d3tL7uqSuQ8MHTy4hbKSw3mlz3SkZvcAkof6wkMyrbLdfU0tJ0rmBh5fdRPY1x80AvW A/wpKOr/u4mV4kf1yqeiF6ItMSbYAvzteKET1BwFU6pPXCufKCrGhJvkQ9KjOJ3fl1At F9eqjhTpZJS9e+n1lEGQaWrSjSBeqL1ADwvSdnHfQmsWfyMcOmgqbIg7iqvLJwgk4l7m Qd/A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=CldWxF+xHdMGvS6Ww1B8FNZQUYPzrzWUDuo2TU0I4PM=; b=MTnNzfgKQZq4dSoEaw1wMpIbVMmb5Q61lHBgIhgPPlYxetnOK9qhiOogyPrYxKQQah snufY3BvUtPUQglBbupqJVDAjABhZXdwZvYCRE3cJgSmM/nrV3AbIR3fnq2ciPLT5V23 Vt0hTOW0uyoLZaNqRuzU57P1yyA5gyMGx7OYCfoiWF5yhf2FT3UbKwKSTKqMsgKTDIPE UbiIB1SlpVUlnm6Ta5i1ZZVuNAdQo5dWsLgpyxjF4Yqib4/iHqPrZZcYK3o1t4dorO0G zYzpvR8GZ055GmB/TiFXlRIv1tVnI8f1T5B0wk5fqPsR0PypiXoMFIgAxEhclecUtTIu e2cA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530aXoYyjWfriCQNI68vEvJyinV+Kz1Yo1m36tVakQfnt5DavyiB 0inX4a5ZRKZ3eyyGaocAOPg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwvQI25wT11ooPWmvblcwDtsd2TZz/VblITP8t0Z8TTBiF4LO6D6NNriPTY1X6BIjEfcMRIsA== X-Received: by 2002:a62:18d2:0:b0:4a2:b2d0:c39f with SMTP id 201-20020a6218d2000000b004a2b2d0c39fmr30558131pfy.69.1637197260931; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 17:01:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from ast-mbp ([2620:10d:c090:400::5:6d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d3sm860320pfv.57.2021.11.17.17.00.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 17:01:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 17:00:59 -0800 From: Alexei Starovoitov To: Lorenz Bauer Cc: Shuah Khan , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , kernel-team , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , Network Development , bpf , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] selftests: bpf: check map in map pruning Message-ID: <20211118010059.c2mixoshcrcz4ywq@ast-mbp> References: <20211111161452.86864-1-lmb@cloudflare.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 08:47:45AM +0000, Lorenz Bauer wrote: > On Sat, 13 Nov 2021 at 01:27, Alexei Starovoitov > wrote: > > > > Not sure how you've tested it, but it doesn't work in unpriv: > > $ test_verifier 789 > > #789/u map in map state pruning FAIL > > processed 26 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states > > 2 peak_states 2 mark_read 1 > > #789/p map in map state pruning OK > > Strange, I have a script that I use for bisecting which uses a minimal > .config + virtue to run a vm, plus I was debugging in gdb at the same > time. I might have missed this, apologies. > > I guess vmtest.sh is the canonical way to run tests now? vmtest.sh runs test_progs only. That's the minimum bar that developers have to pass before sending patches. BPF CI runs test_progs, test_progs-no_alu32, test_verifier and test_maps. If in doubt run them all.